Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Managerial Decision-Making Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Information-Driven Decision in a Malaysian Private Healthcare Provider

Authors

Theenaradshi Gopala Krishnan

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Haliza Mohd Said

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Navina Sharon N. Vijayandran

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Jennyfer John

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800467

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 7288-7301

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-24

Accepted: 2026-08-29

Published: 2026-09-08

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption on managerial decision-making effectiveness, with Information-Driven Decision Capability (IDC) as a mediating variable, within the context of private healthcare providers in Malaysia. As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into healthcare operations, understanding how these systems influence managerial decision-making has become increasingly important. A quantitative, cross-sectional, and explanatory research design was adopted. Data were collected from managerial-level employees using a structured questionnaire through purposive sampling. A total of 153 valid responses were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to examine the proposed relationships and mediation effects. The findings reveal that Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), and AI Reliability (REL) have significant positive relationships with Information-Driven Decision Capability (IDC). In addition, IDC has a strong positive effect on Managerial Decision-Making Effectiveness (MDME). The results further show that PU and REL have direct significant effects on MDME, while PEOU does not directly influence MDME. Mediation analysis confirms that IDC partially mediates the relationships between PU and REL with MDME, while fully mediating the relationship between PEOU and MDME. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of AI in managerial decision-making is not solely dependent on technology adoption, but also on managers’ capability to interpret and utilise AI-generated insights effectively. This study contributes to the literature by identifying IDC as a key mechanism linking AI adoption and decision-making effectiveness, particularly within private healthcare organisations.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Reliability, Information-Driven Decision Capability, Managerial Decision-Making Effectiveness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness

Downloads

References

1. Bolin, J. (2014). Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Journal of Educational Measurement. 51. 335-337. 10.1111/jedm.12050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, Y., Prentice, C., Weaven, S., & Hsiao, A. (2022). A systematic literature review of AI in the sharing economy. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 32(3), 434-451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chowdhury, I. J., & Tanvir, M. A. Y. (2026). Trustworthy Machine Learning for Cybersecurity: A Decision-Centric Survey of Explainability, Uncertainty, and Human Factors. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dodda, S, Narne, S, Adedoja, T., Mohan, M., & Mohan, T. (2024). AI-Driven Decision Support Systems in Management: Enhancing Strategic Planning and Execution. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kajiita, R. M., & Simon Murote Kang'ethe. (2025). Social Work And Artificial Intelligence: Implications For South African Social Work Practice And Education. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15803208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Karim, H.H, Abd Hamid, N.B., and Che Rus, M.F. (2024). Exploring The Impact And Challenges Of Using Artificial Intelligence In An Open, Distance And Digital Education University: A Conceptual Paper. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 6(2), 15–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Li, A. J., Krishna, S., & Lakkaraju, H. (2025, May). More rlhf, more trust? on the impact of preference alignment on trustworthiness. In International Conference on Learning Representations (Vol. 2025, pp. 46561-46581). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nisar QA, Haider S, Ameer I, Hussain MS, Gill SS, Usama A (2023), "Sustainable supply chain management performance in post COVID-19 era in an emerging economy: a big data perspective". International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 18 No. 12 pp. 5900–5920, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2021-1807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shafa, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven business intelligence models for enhancing decision-making in us enterprises. ASRC Procedia: Global Perspectives in Science and Scholarship, 1(01), 771-800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 161–176). North-Holland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69 : 493 – 513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. W. H. O. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. World Health Organization, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles