Artificial Intelligence (AI) and The Future of Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Adoption, Research, Ethics, and Teaching & Learning

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), is rapidly reshaping higher education by transforming academic research, teaching practices, learning processes, and institutional approaches to technology adoption. However, the rapid expansion of AI also raises concerns regarding academic integrity, privacy, data ownership, algorithmic bias, misinformation, and responsible use. This systematic literature review (SLR) synthesises recent evidence on the role of AI in higher education, with particular attention to four dimensions: AI adoption, AI-assisted academic research, AI ethics, and AI-enabled teaching and learning. Following the PRISMA framework, studies were identified through Scopus and Web of Science and assessed using predefined inclusion, exclusion, and quality appraisal criteria. From the initial 260 records, the screening and eligibility processes resulted in 20 studies being included in the final qualitative synthesis. The findings reveal that AI-assisted academic research represents the most prominent research area (35%), followed by AI-enabled teaching and learning (25%), AI adoption (20%), and AI ethics (20%). The reviewed studies demonstrate that AI supports literature reviews, academic writing, text revision, data analysis, referencing, personalised learning, feedback, student engagement, and research productivity. At the same time, effective implementation requires AI literacy, critical judgement, ethical awareness, institutional guidance, and appropriate training. The review identifies a significant need for integrated and longitudinal research examining AI adoption, ethical practice, learning outcomes, critical thinking, research quality, and student engagement across diverse disciplines and contexts. The study concludes that AI should function as a supportive technology that complements human judgement rather than replacing academic responsibility, providing implications for universities, educators, researchers, students, and policymakers.

AI in higher education

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alenezi, A. (2024). The effect of emotional intelligence on higher education: A pilot study on the interplay between artificial intelligence, emotional intelligence, and e-learning. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences, 11(2), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2024.21367 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Shamrani, A. S. A., Alhomayani, R. E. S., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2026). The role of generative artificial intelligence in advancing sustainable and environmentally responsible teaching practices among postgraduate students. Sustainability, 18(5), 2450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alvarez, G., & Cress, U. (2024). The uses of digital technologies in dissertation writing: Perspectives of Argentine graduate students in social sciences and humanities. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asagar, M. S. (2026). Navigating the future: Attitudes and ethical implications of AI tools in academic research. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(1), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.32674/cb7h5r51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Avdiu-Kryeziu, S., & Kryeziu, V. (2026). Students' use of artificial intelligence in academic research: Benefits, challenges, and academic integrity. Praxis Educativa, 21, e24164. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.21.24164.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. de Jesus, L. F. (2026). AI-assisted research writing: Graduate students' experiences, outcomes and academic integrity. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(5), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.5.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ebrahimi, Z., Esfandiari, M. R., & Rahimi, F. (2026). Postgraduate EFL students’ engagement with ChatGPT in academic research: A qualitative study in Iran. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 29(1), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v29i1.572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hu, Y., Yu, X., Hu, Y., & Li, K. (2025). Determinants of continuance intention to use GAI in academic research among graduate students: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20289–20315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13565-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jin, S., Cheng, J., Zhang, A., Lei, Z., & Liu, X. (2026). AI literacy as contextual judgement: Postgraduate researchers’ appropriateness judgements of generative AI use in a multilingual Chinese setting. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1886090. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1886090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3). EBSE Technical Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024). Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kumar, S., & Gunn, A. (2025). Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in the literature review process. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marín, Y. R., Caro, O. C., Rubio, Y. D. M., Tuesta, J. N. A., Bardales, E. S., Rituay, A. M. C., & Santos, R. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a teaching tool in university education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1578451. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1578451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Porwal, S., & Shabbir, N. (2026). Artificial intelligence and digitalization in higher education: Enhancing doctoral research productivity in Indian universities. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 111(1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v111i1.6347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahim, N., Nesar, S., Hashmi, U. P., Rasheed, A., Majeed, S., Noor, B., Zehra, A., Naqvi, M., Usmani, M. S., & Jamshed, S. (2026). Familiarity, attitude and practice of postgraduate health science students of Pakistan regarding the implication of artificial intelligence in research: An analytical survey. BMC Medical Education, 26(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08632-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ringo, D. S. (2025). The effect of generative AI use on doctoral students’ academic research progress: The moderating role of hedonic gratification. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2475268. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2475268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tovmasyan, G. (2025). Higher education in Armenia adopting AI and digital technologies: Students' experiences and perspectives. Issues in Educational Research, 35(2), 798–817. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wu, Z. J. (2026). Evaluating the impact of AI tools on academic performance and student satisfaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(2), e70225. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yu, X., Hu, Y., Hu, Y., & Li, K. (2025). Exploring factors that influence graduate students’ intention to use generative artificial intelligence in academic research: PLS-SEM and fsQCA methods. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 19447–19472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13530-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, J., Pan, W., Liang, X., & Ge, J. (2025). Development and validation of the ICAP GenAI scale to measure how graduate students integrate generative AI into academic research. European Journal of Education, 60(3), e70209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhu, G., Pan, F., & Sui, W. (2026). The effect of informal academic support on innovation capability of postgraduate students in the context of digital transformation: Multiple mediating effects of psychological capital and learning engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2670528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study