Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Imaging: Literacy, Acceptance, Attitude, and Readiness among Radiologic Technologists

Authors

Jefferson King A. Fontilar

Liceo de Cagayan University Cagayan de Oro City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300532

Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 7280-7287

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-27

Accepted: 2026-04-01

Published: 2026-04-16

Abstract

Since the Industrial Revolution, technological advancements have transformed the way humans work, with machines increasingly replacing manual labor across various fields. One of the most significant developments is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which has been defined as the creation of intelligent machines and computer programs capable of performing tasks that normally require human intelligence. However, gaps remain in the literature. Most studies focus on students, with fewer examining practicing radiologic technologists, especially in under-resourced settings. Research is also concentrated in the Middle East, Europe, and the Americas, leaving Southeast Asia, particularly the Philippines, less explored. Using a quantitative correlational–predictive design, data were gathered from 100 radiologic technologists and analyzed through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. Results showed that all variables, namely, literacy, acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI), and attitude towards AI, were “high” and significantly correlated with readiness for use among radiologic technologists. Exposure to different technologies emerges as the strongest predictor, followed by exposure and training.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, readiness, literacy, acceptance, attitude, radiologic technologists, medical imaging, technology exposure

Downloads

References

1. Akudjedu, T. N., Torre, S., Khine, R., Katsifarakis, D., Newman, D., & Malamateniou, C. (2023). Knowledge, perceptions, and expectations of Artificial intelligence in radiography practice: A global radiography workforce survey. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 54(1), 104-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Coakley, S., Young, R., Moore, N., England, A., O'Mahony, A., O'Connor, O. J., ... & McEntee, M. F. (2022). Radiographers’ knowledge, attitudes and expectations of artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Radiography, 28(4), 943–948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in generative AI tools: A comparative study of higher education students, teachers, and researchers. Information, 16(7), 622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Doherty, G., McLaughlin, L., Hughes, C., McConnell, J., Bond, R., & McFadden, S. (2024). Radiographer education and learning in artificial intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students’ knowledge of and attitude to education on AI. Radiography, 30, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nazaretsky, T., Mejia-Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2025). The critical role of trust in adopting AI-powered educational technology for learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pedersen, M. R. V., Kusk, M. W., Lysdahlgaard, S., Mork-Knudsen, H., Malamateniou, C., & Jensen, J. (2024). A Nordic survey on artificial intelligence in the radiography profession. Radiography, 30(4), 1106–1115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sarmiento, R. F. R., Overgaard, S. M., Gai, C., Overgaard, J. D., & Ohde, J. W. (2025). Guiding responsible AI in healthcare in the Philippines. NPJ Digital Medicine, 8(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01755-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles