Artificial Intelligence Integration for Teaching and Learning English Writing: A Systematic Review on Strategies (2021-2025)

In today’s digital era, English education landscape has been profoundly reshaped by the growing presence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across schools and higher education institutions. AI has quickly become a valued tool among educators and learners, particularly for English writing, a skill often perceived as laborious and complex. Writing is often viewed as the most challenging between reading, speaking, and listening as it requires active language production. Although AI tools offer personalised support and instant feedback to improve English writing instruction, their use in ESL classrooms and English for elementary and high school levels remains limited. Educators often face obstacles such as limited training, experience and clear guidance on integrating AI effectively. Despite growing interest for AI use in education, there remains a shortage of in-depth reviews exploring application of these tools to support English writing instruction in these specific contexts. By reviewing 25 past papers from the year 2021 to 2025, this systematic literature review paper provides fresh insights into AI integration in teaching and learning of English writing, instead of traditional teaching models, to foster learner-centred and autonomous learning, enhances writing skills, improves engagement, motivation and self-efficacy among students while reducing teachers’ workload. Drawing insights from Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC databases, this systematic literature review paper sheds light on the range of AI tools integrated and strategies of AI tool integration according to roles, for English writing lessons. For English writing instruction, ChatGPT emerged as the most popularly used whereas the most common strategy of AI use was as automated feedback tool, followed by as assessment tool and paraphrasing tool. Building on these findings, future research should further explore AI-supported English writing instruction in Malaysia, investigate gamebased learning and gamification with AI for English writing, and develop online English writing modules with integrated AI features.

Artificial intelligence; writing

1. Abduljawad, S. A. (2024). Investigating the impact of ChatGPT as an AI tool on ESL Writing: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Ghulamuddin, N. J., Mohd Mohari, S. K., & Ariffin, K. (2021). Discovering writing difficulties of Malay ESL primary school level students. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v2i1.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Buainain, H. (2009). Students' writing errors in EFL: A case study. Journal of Faculty of Education, 19(1), 311-351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alsamadani, H. A. (2010). The relationship between Saudi EFL students’ writing competence, L1 writing proficiency, and self-regulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 53-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. AlTameemy, F. A., Alrefaee, Y. & Alalwi, F. S. (2020). Using blackboard as a tool of e-assessment in testing writing skill in Saudi Arabia. Asian ESP Journal, 16 (6 2). 183-202. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3760191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arafah, B., & Kaharuddin. (2019). The representation of complaints in English and Indonesian discourses. Opción, 35, 501-517. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4829. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Asman, J., Poobalan, G., Mustapha, M., & Talip, R. (2023). Factors affecting teacher workload in low enrollment schools: A survey of Sarawak state schools, Malaysia. International Journal Of Academic Research In Progressive Education And Development, 12(4), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/19541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Barkaoui, K. (2007). Teaching writing to second language learners: Insights from theory and research. TESL reporter, 40(1), 35-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57(2), 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cambridge University Press and Assessment. (2023). The Cambridge English Scale explained: A guide to converting practice test scores to Cambridge English Scale scores. Cambridge English. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/210434-converting-practice-test-scores-to-cambridge-englishscale-scores.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chan, S. T., Lo, N. P. K., & Wong, A. M. H. (2024). Enhancing university level English proficiency with generative AI: Empirical insights into automated feedback and learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chanpradit, T., Samran, P., Saengpinit, S., & Subkasin, P. (2024). English paraphrasing strategies and levels of proficiency of an AI-generated QuillBot and Paraphrasing Tool: Case study of scientific research abstracts. Journal of English Teaching, 10(2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v10i2.5619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, J. (2023). Reform of English writing teaching method under the background of big data and artificial intelligence. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 19(4), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.316828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cong, Y. (2025). Demystifying large language models in second language development research. Computer Speech & Language, 89(101700), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2024.101700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dong, D. (2024). Tapping into the pedagogical potential of infinigoChatIC: Evidence from iWrite scoring and comments and Lu & Ai’s linguistic complexity analyzer. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 124-137. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. ETX Daily Up. (2023, October 28). Globally, teachers ‘feel overwhelmed by advances in AI’. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/leisure/2023/10/28/globally-teachers-feeloverwhelmed-by-advances-in-ai/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fitria, T. N. (2022). Avoiding plagiarism of students’ scientific writing by using the QuillBot paraphraser. Elsya, 4(3), 252-262. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring the peer assessment process: A multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 435–449. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Google Malaysia. (2020, June 15). Kementerian Pendidikan melancarkan pelantar pembelajaran digital baru dengan kerjasama Google, Microsoft dan Apple. Blog Rasmi Google Malaysia. https://malaysia.googleblog.com/2020/06/kementerian-pendidikan-melancarkan.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Higgins, J. P., López-López, J. A., & Aloe, A. M. (2021). Meta-regression. In C. H. Schmid, T. Stijnen, & I. White (Eds.), Handbook of Meta-Analysis (pp. 129-150). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Higgs, J. M., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2024). Being human in the age of generative AI: young people’s ethical concerns about writing and living with machines. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(4), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hsiao, J., & Chang, J. S. (2023). Enhancing EFL reading and writing through AI-powered tools: Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 4934-4949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Huda, M. C., & Roistika, N. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English learning: Advantages, challenges, and future opportunities. BRIGHT: A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v8i1.7375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ibrahim, K. (2023). Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The terminator versus the machines”. Lang Test Asia 13(46), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-002602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jeyraman, J., Md Yunus, M., & Mohd Said, N. E. (2025). ChatGPT for ESL Writing: A Case Study on Year 6 ESL pupils' perceptions. International Journal Of Academic Research In Progressive Education And Development, 14(1), 1544-1557. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jubier, M. M., Al-Rawe, M. F. A., & Ghaithi, A. A. (2024). Effect of EditGPT on the learners` autonomy and learning anxiety. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(8), 369390. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kotmungkun, S., Chompurach, W., & Thaksanan, P. (2024). OpenAI ChatGPT vs Google Gemini: A study of AI chatbots’ writing quality evaluation and plagiarism checking. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 7(2), 90-108. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v7i2.11572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kristiawan, (2024). Artificial intelligence in English language learning: A systematic review of AI tools, applications, and pedagogical outcomes. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TATEFL), 5(2), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v5i2.912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2025). Transforming EFL teaching with AI: A systematic review of empirical studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 23(1-4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00470-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kurt, G., & Kurt, Y. (2024). Enhancing L2 writing skills: ChatGPT as an automated feedback tool. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.28945/5370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lee, J. E., & Maeng, U. (2023). Perceptions of high school students on AI chatbots use in English learning: Benefits, concerns, and ethical consideration. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.25256/PAAL.27.2.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Liu, Z. M., Hwang, G. J., Chen, C. Q., Chen, X. D., & Ye, X. D. (2024). Integrating large language models into EFL writing instruction: effects on performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2389923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mabuan, R. A. (2024). ChatGPT and ELT: Exploring teachers’ voices. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 128-153. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mohamad Uri, N. F., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers’ awareness and the Challenges. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 168183. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mok, O. (2023, February 18). Educators welcome AI chatbots applications in education, can improve student's learning capabilities. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/02/18/educators-welcome-ai-chatbots-applications-ineducation-can-improve-students-learning-capabilities/55090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2020). Intelligent personal assistants: Can they understand and be understood by accented L2 learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 865–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1595664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (pp. 3-22). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Octavio, M. M., Argüellob, V. G., & Pujolà, J. T. (2024). ChatGPT as an AI L2 teaching support: A case study of an EFL teacher. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Prospects and challenges in Saudi Arabian higher education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.367276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5020–5040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Saarna, C. (2024). Identifying whether a short essay was written by a university student or ChatGPT. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Shabara, R., Elebyary, K., & Boraie, D. (2024). Teachers or Chatgpt: The issue of accuracy and consistency in L2 assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.56297/vaca6841/LRDX3699/XSEZ5215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Shin, D., & Chon, Y. V. (2023). Second language learners’ post-editing strategies for machine translation errors. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–25. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Lee, J. C. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 452-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Simangunsong, B. A. M. P. (2023). Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Bisnisman: Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, 4(3), 62-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.52005/bisnisman.v4i3.119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Solanki, A., Kumar, S., & Nayyar, A. (2019). Handbook of research on emerging trends and applications of machine learning. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Stryker, C., & Kavlakoglu, E. (2024, August 9). What is artificial intelligence (AI)? IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-intelligence [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sun, Y. (2024). AI in teaching English writing: Automatic scoring and feedback system. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sung, S., & Jang, I. C. (2024). South Korean STEM graduate students’ use of ChatGPT in self-initiated L2 writing: A process-tracing study. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 24, 1415-1435. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202412.1415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. University of Illinois Chicago. (2025, March 21). What is (AI) Artificial Intelligence?. https://meng.uic.edu/news-stories/ai-artificial-intelligence-what-is-the-definition-of-ai-and-how-does-aiwork/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wang, D. (2024). Teacher-versus AI-generated (Poe application) corrective feedback and language learners’ writing anxiety, complexity, fluency, and accuracy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Woo, D. J., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. H., Guo, K., & Fung, A. K. Y. (2024). Exploring AI generated text in student writing: How does AI help?. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 183–209. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Wu, L. Q., Wu, Y., & Zhang, X. Y. (2021). L2 learner cognitive psychological factors about artificial intelligence writing corrective feedback. English Language Teaching, 14(10), 70-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n10p70 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Xuyen, N. T. (2023). Using the online paraphrasing tool QuillBot to assist students in paraphrasing the source information: English-majored students’ perceptions. In T. N. Tran (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 21-27). AIJR Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.150.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yong, W., & Schun, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492–526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Zainuddin, N. M., Bukhari, N. A., & Mohamad, M. (2024) Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) as a pedagogical tool in tertiary ESL classroom: Teachers' perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(8), 907-921. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14i8/22456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Zaki, A. W. & Darmi, R. (2021). The implementation of CEFR in ESL Learning: Why does it matter to the Malaysian Education System?. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.1.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Zindela, N. (2023). Comparing measures of syntactic and lexical complexity in artificial intelligence and L2 human-generated argumentative essays. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 19(3), 50-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study