Assessing the Influence of Landscape Factors in School Gardens on Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions, Use, and Restorative Experiences

This study examined how school garden landscape factors shape special education teachers’ perceptions, use patterns, and restorative experiences in two public special education schools in Zhejiang Province, China. Although school gardens are increasingly recognised as supportive environments for mental restoration, evidence on teachers, especially those working in special education settings, remains limited. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 114 teachers to assess perceived stress, garden use patterns, evaluations of ten landscape factors, and perceptions of four dimensions of overall garden quality. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression were applied. Results showed that 95.61% of teachers reported experiencing work related stress at least sometimes, and 92.98% agreed that natural environments help relieve stress and promote psychological recovery. However, actual garden use remained limited, as only 19.30% visited almost daily and 52.63% typically stayed for 16 to 30 minutes. Teachers mainly used the garden for low intensity and restorative activities such as passing through, sitting quietly, and grounding. Overall garden quality was evaluated relatively low, particularly for psychological restoration and sensory quality, while several individual landscape factors received high ratings. Correlation analysis revealed that vegetation coverage, educational spaces, natural shading, aromatic flowers, and locally adapted plants were positively associated with multiple quality dimensions. In the final regression model, perceived aromatic flowers (β = 0.25, p < 0.05) emerged as the strongest positive predictor of overall garden quality, while visit duration (β = –0.27, p < 0.05) showed a significant negative effect. These findings highlight a mismatch between teachers’ restorative needs and current garden performance, and emphasise the importance of sensory rich planting and context responsive design in improving restorative school landscapes for special education teachers.

Keywords

Special education schools, school garden, teachers’ perceptions, landscape quality

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Akoumianaki-Ioannidou, A., Paraskevopoulou, A. T., & Tachou, V. (2016). School grounds as a resource of green space to increase child–plant contact. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allahyar, M., & Kazemi, F. (2021). Effect of landscape design elements on promoting neuropsychological health of children. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65, 127333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bellamy, J., Fensom, S., & N. van Doorn. (2022). Physical activity knowledge and confidence of education staff in a special education setting. British Journal of Special Education, 50(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernardo, F., Loupa-Ramos, I., Matos Silva, C., & Manso, M. (2021). The restorative effect of the presence of greenery on the classroom in children’s cognitive performance. Sustainability, 13(6), 3488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cai, K., Huang, W., & Lin, G. (2022). Bridging landscape preference and landscape design: A study on the preference and optimal combination of landscape elements based on conjoint analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 73, 127615–127615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cui, Q. (2022). Research on campus landscape optimization of special education schools for children with autism (Master’s thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology). https://doi.org/10.27393/d.cnki.gxazu.2022.001217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Curtis, D. S., Rigolon, A., Schmalz, D. L., & Brown, B. B. (2022). Policy and environmental predictors of park visits during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic: getting out while staying in. Environment and Behavior, 54(2), 487-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211031199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dean, M., Harwood, R., & Kasari, C. (2017). The art of camouflage: Gender differences in the social behaviors of girls and boys with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 21(6), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DeGuzman, P. B., Abooali, S., Sadatsafavi, H., Bohac, G., & Sochor, M. (2024). Back to basics: Practical strategies to reduce sensory overstimulation in the emergency department identified by adults and caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder. International emergency nursing, 72, 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dobbie, M. F., & Brown, R. R. (2014). A framework for understanding risk perception, explored from the perspective of the water practitioner. Risk analysis, 34(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Duan, Y., Bai, H., Yang, L., Li, S., & Zhu, Q. (2024). Impact of seasonal changes in urban green spaces with diverse vegetation structures on college students' physical and mental health. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67075-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Du, Y., Zou, Z., He, Y., Zhou, Y., & Luo, S. (2022). Beyond blue and green spaces: identifying and characterizing restorative environments on Sichuan technology and business university campus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13500. https : //doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ernst, J. (2013). Early childhood educators’ use of natural outdoor settings as learning environments: an exploratory study of beliefs, practices, and barriers. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Guardino, C., Hall, K. W., Largo-Wight, E., & Hubbuch, C. (2019). Teacher and student perceptions of an outdoor classroom. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-00033-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hosek, M., & Spaulding, L. (2020). Special education in China: exploring the perceptions of Chinese teachers. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 15(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jacobs, M. H., & Buijs, A. E. (2011). Understanding stakeholders' attitudes toward water management interventions: Role of place meanings. Water Resources Research, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Johannesson, E., Ohlson, J. A., & Zhai, S. W. (2024). The explanatory power of explanatory variables. Review of Accounting Studies, 29(4), 3053-3083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-023-09781-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kelz, C., Evans, G. W., & Röderer, K. (2015). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513510528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kim, M. K. (2022). The effect of greenspace on school commuting routes on pedestrian satisfaction and the future direction of creation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 50(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2022.50.1.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lappa, C., Kyparissos, N. and Paraskevopoulos, S. (2017), Environmental education at the special school: opinions of special education teachers. Natural Sciences Education, 46: 1-10 170004. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2017.02.0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liu, Y. (2024). Research on landscape design of special education schools for visually impaired students based on interactive design concepts (Master’s thesis, Jilin Academy of Arts). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liu, Y., Li, J., Zheng, Q., Zaroff, C. M., Hall, B. J., Li, X., & Hao, Y. (2016). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of autism spectrum disorder in a stratified sampling of preschool teachers in China. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0845-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mani, M., & Woolley, H. (2024). Evaluating children’s preferences of the orphanages’ outdoor spaces: Integrated multi-method ‘Jourchin’ approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93(102191), 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Marcus, C. C., & Sachs, N. A. (2014). Therapeutic Landscapes: An Evidence-Based Approach to Designing Healing Gardens and Restorative Outdoor Spaces. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nazir, J., & Pedretti, E. (2016). Educators’ perceptions of bringing students to environmental consciousness through engaging outdoor experiences. Environmental Education Research, 22(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.996208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ochsner, M. (2021). Representativeness of Surveys and its Analysis. FORS Guides, 15, Version 1.1, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24449/FG-2021-00015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Patchen, A. K., Rakow, D. A., Wells, N. M., Hillson, S., & Meredith, G. R. (2022). Barriers to children’s outdoor time: teachers’ and principals’ experiences in elementary schools. Environmental Education Research, 30(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2099530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pouya, S., Bayramoğlu, E., & Demirel, Ö. (2017). The importance of school garden for students with orthopedic disabilities. Journal of International Social Research, 10(53). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20175334151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rafi, Z. N., Kazemi, F., & Tehranifar, A. (2019). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563–126563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Salih, S. A., Ismail, S., Norsidah Ujang, Mustafa, F. A., & Ismail, N. A. (2023). Pocket settings for enhancing social learning experience on campus ground: A verbal-visual preference survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(9), 102134–102134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Scartazza, A., Mancini, M. L., Proietti, S., Moscatello, S., Mattioni, C., Costantini, F., Di Baccio, D., Villani, F., & Massacci, A. (2020). Caring local biodiversity in a healing garden: Therapeutic benefits in young subjects with autism. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 47, 126511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Song, X., Wang, Z., Meng, X., & Liu, M. (2024). A Qualitative Study on University Students’ Restorative Experience of the Library Space Environment. Buildings, 14(6), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Song, X., & Wu, Q. (2022). Study on smellscape perception and landscape application of fragrant plants. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 67, 127429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tabatabaie, S., Litt, J. S., & Brian H.F. Muller. (2023). Sidewalks, trees and shade matter: A visual landscape assessment approach to understanding people’s preferences for walking. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 84, 127931–127931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tao, Y., Zhao, F., Xue, M., Jiang, B., Lau, S. S. Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Factors Influencing Seating Preferences in Semi-Outdoor Learning Spaces at Tropical Universities. Buildings, 13(4), 982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. van den Berg, A. E., Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., & Tanja-Dijkstra, K. (2017). Green walls for a restorative classroom environment: A controlled evaluation study. Environment and Behavior, 49(7), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516667976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. van Rijswijk, L., & Haans, A. (2017). Illuminating for safety: Investigating the role of lighting appraisals on the perception of safety in the urban environment. Environment and Behavior, 50(8), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517718888 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wang, R., Jiang, W., & Lu, T. (2021). Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127389–127389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wang, R., Wu, G., & Wen, Y. (2023). Design of special education school landscape environment based on the needs of students with intellectual disabilities. Art and Design (Theory), 2(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.16824/j.cnki.issn10082832.2023.01.037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wang, X. (2020). Research on outdoor space design of special education schools under the concept of rehabilitation landscape (Master’s thesis, Chang’an University). https://doi.org/10.26976/d.cnki.gchau.2020.001122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Li, J. (2023). Effect of plantscape preference on the psychological recovery of university students: Based on the mediating effect of prototype landscape consciousness. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 88, 128088–128088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Winding, T. N., Aust, B., & Andersen, L. P. S. (2022). The association between pupils aggressive behaviour and burnout among Danish school teachers-the role of stress and social support at work. BMC public health, 22(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Yang, M., Wu, R., Bao, Z., Yan, H., Nan, X., Luo, Y., & Dai, T. (2023). Effects of urban park environmental factors on landscape preference based on spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of visitors. Forests, 14(8), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Yusop, S. Z., Yassin, M. H. M., & Tahar, M. M. (2020). Sensory Garden Approach to Increase Autism Students’ Learning Focus in Primary Schools. In International Conference on Special Education in South East Asia Region 10th Series 2020, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.32698/gcs-04316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Zhao, J., Abdul Aziz, F., Song, M., Zhang, H., Ujang, N., Xiao, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2024). Evaluating Visitor Usage and Safety Perception Experiences in National Forest Parks. Land, 13(9), 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education. (2025, April 15). 2024 Zhejiang Education Development Statistical Bulletin. Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education. https://jyt.zj.gov.cn/art/2025/4/15/art_1229266680_5495915.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Assessing the Influence of Landscape Factors in School Gardens on Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions, Use, and Restorative Experiences

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles