Assessing Uganda’s National Climate Change Policy: Water, Governance, and Climate Finance for Nomadic Pastoralists in Karamoja

Authors

Maxwell Ralph Ochen

Egerton University (Kenya)

Joel K. Ng’eno

Egerton University (Kenya)

William Orora

Egerton University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500825

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 12192-12202

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-12

Accepted: 2026-05-18

Published: 2026-06-15

Abstract

Climate change continues to threaten pastoral livelihoods in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly in Uganda’s Karamoja sub-region, where nomadic pastoralism remains the foundation of local economies. Despite the implementation of Uganda’s National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) in 2015, pastoralist communities still experience limited access to water and grazing land, weak stakeholder engagement, and minimal benefit from climate financing. This study assessed the effects of the NCCP on the livelihoods of nomadic pastoralists in Rengen Sub-county, Kotido District, focusing on three key policy components: water source management, stakeholder engagement, and climate financing. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, integrating data from 234 households selected through stratified random sampling and 20 key informants purposively chosen from local leaders, government officials, and development partners. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation in SPSS, while qualitative data were examined thematically. Findings indicated that water source management under the NCCP significantly improved access to water and grazing resources, thereby enhancing livestock health and productivity. However, inadequate maintenance of water facilities and weak alignment with pastoral mobility patterns limited overall effectiveness. Stakeholder engagement was found to be largely top-down, with insufficient inclusion of traditional institutions and pastoralist voices, particularly women. Climate financing supported localized interventions such as valley tanks and rangeland restoration but remained constrained by centralized allocation systems, weak institutional capacity, and low transparency. The study concludes that while the NCCP has made measurable progress in building pastoral resilience, its implementation remains fragmented and insufficiently responsive to the socio-cultural and ecological realities of mobile pastoralism. The research recommends strengthening participatory governance, prioritizing mobile water infrastructure, enhancing community access to climate finance, and integrating indigenous knowledge into adaptation planning. These findings provide evidence-based insights for policymakers and development partners seeking to design more inclusive, flexible, and context-specific climate interventions in Uganda’s pastoral regions.

Keywords

National Climate Change Policy, nomadic pastoralists

Downloads

References

1. Aklilu, Y., & Catley, A. (2020). Livelihoods and climate resilience in pastoral communities of East Africa. Feinstein International Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asingwire, N., Okiror, J. J., & Mugisha, S. (2022). Education and adaptation to climate change among semi-arid communities in Uganda. Environmental Research and Policy Review, 15(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. FAO. (2023). Building climate-resilient pastoral systems in Uganda. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kaboha, P., Namara, R., & Akello, J. (2024). Assessing water and climate resource management under Uganda’s National Climate Change Policy. African Journal of Climate and Development, 9(2), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kasirye, I., & Mugagga, F. (2023). Challenges of implementing climate change adaptation policies in Uganda’s drylands. Climate Policy and Development Studies, 8(2), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE). (2022). National Climate Change Policy Implementation Framework 2021–2026. Government of Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE). (2024). Uganda Climate Action Progress Report 2023. Government of Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Musinguzi, P., Oryema, B., & Adoch, J. (2022). Education, gender, and financial literacy in climate adaptation programs in northern Uganda. Development Practice and Policy Journal, 12(1), 22–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nsubuga, F. N. W., Kansiime, F., & Nakileza, B. R. (2021). Climate variability and adaptive governance in arid Uganda. Regional Environmental Change, 21(2), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nyeko, R., & Okurut, A. (2023). Localizing national climate policy: Lessons from Karamoja sub-region. Journal of African Policy and Governance, 7(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ochieng, J., Auma, L., & Tenywa, G. (2021). Climate finance for resilience building in Uganda’s semi-arid areas. African Journal of Environmental Economics, 14(3), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Opio, E., Lomo, D., & Akello, F. (2024). Integrating indigenous knowledge into climate adaptation among pastoralists in Karamoja. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 14(1), 12–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNDP. (2023). Community-driven climate adaptation in pastoral areas of Uganda. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNEP. (2022). Gender and climate finance in East Africa: Equity and participation report. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Bank. (2024). Resilient drylands: Strengthening pastoral livelihoods under climate change. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles