Assessing Waste Disposal and Recycling Behavior in Public Spaces: Habits, Barriers, Incentives, and Digital Solutions

Authors

Ike C. Tapitan

College of Computing Studies, Information and Communication Technology, Isabela State University, Cabagan, Isabela (Philippines)

Rosemary L. Buraga

College of Computing Studies, Information and Communication Technology, Isabela State University, Cabagan, Isabela (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200594

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 8370-8381

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-17

Accepted: 2026-01-22

Published: 2026-03-21

Abstract

The ongoing production of waste globally poses serious environmental concerns, particularly in developing countries such as the Philippines. Despite national legislation like the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (RA 9003) and local programs in Cabagan, Isabela, sustaining active public engagement in recycling remains difficult. This study, titled Assessing Waste Disposal and Recycling Behavior in Public Spaces: Habits, Barriers, Incentives, and Digital Solutions, examined waste behaviors, common barriers, and potential incentives among 345 participants, including vendors, drivers, students, teachers, and government employees.
A descriptive research design was employed using a structured survey questionnaire. Findings revealed that the use of public recycling bins was generally low, and plastic was the most frequently disposed waste type. Women reported better waste segregation practices than men, though the difference was not statistically significant. The two primary obstacles identified were the lack of accessible recycling bins and limited incentives. Proposed solutions included providing more visible and well-maintained bins and introducing reward-based initiatives.

Keywords

Waste management, recycling behavior, public spaces, sustainable practices

Downloads

References

1. Keramitsoglou, K. M., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2018). Public participation in designing the recycling bins to encourage recycling. *Sustainability, 10*(4), 1240. (https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041240) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Xu, L., Ling, M., & Wu, Y. (2018). Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study. *Waste Management, 77,* 522–531.(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Johansson, K. (2016). Understanding recycling behavior: A study of motivational factors behind waste recycling. *WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 202,* 402–411. (https://doi.org/10.2495/WM160361) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lu, B., & Wang, J. (2022). How can residents be motivated to participate in waste recycling? An analysis based on two survey experiments in China. *Waste Management, 143,* 206–214. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.034) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lakhan, C. (2024). Best practices for recycling in public spaces. *Circular Innovation Hub @EUC, Faculty of Environment and Urban Change, York University.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Banga, M. (2011). Household knowledge, attitudes, and practices in solid waste segregation and recycling: The case of urban Kampala. *Zambia Social Science Journal, 2*(1), 27–39. Retrieved from Cornell Law School. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Phulwani, P. R., Kumar, D., & Goyal, P. (2021). From systematic literature review to a conceptual framework for consumer disposal behavior towards personal communication devices. *Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20,* 1353–(https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1940) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chaudhary, A. H., Polonsky, M. J., & McClaren, N. (2021). Littering behaviour: A systematic review. *International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45,* 478–510. (https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12638) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, N., Phung, P., & Yến-Khanh, N. (2023). Residents’ waste management practices in a developing country: A social practice theory analysis. *Environmental Challenges, 12,* 100770. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100770) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles