Assessment of Relationship Between Adoption of Cryptocurrency and Financial Stability among Low- and Middle-Income Earners in Gwagwalada Area Council, FCT, Nigeria

Authors

Akinwolere Bukola Comfort

University of Abuja (Nigeria)

Kolawole. Oluwatoyin Temitope

University of Abuja (Nigeria)

SABIU, Sani Bariki

University of Abuja (Nigeria)

Akinwolere Charles Olumide

University of Abuja (Nigeria)

Adamu, Taiwo Haruna

University of Abuja (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200072

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 994-1005

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-04

Accepted: 2026-02-09

Published: 2026-02-24

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies have emerged as decentralized digital financial instruments with the potential to enhance financial inclusion, particularly in developing economies. In Nigeria, evolving regulatory frameworks and growing digitalization have accelerated interest in cryptocurrency adoption, yet localized empirical evidence remains scarce. This study examines the assessment of relationship between adoption of cryptocurrency and financial stability among low- and middle-income earners in Gwagwalada Area Council, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The study specifically assesses the level of adoption, perceived financial benefits, associated challenges and risks, and the influence of cryptocurrency usage on savings patterns. Adopting a descriptive survey research design, quantitative data were collected from 250 respondents comprising traders, artisans, students, civil servants, and small-scale entrepreneurs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chisquare tests to test the stated hypotheses. The findings reveal a significant level of cryptocurrency adoption, with 58.8% of respondents reporting active use. Cryptocurrency adoption was perceived to enhance financial independence, reduce transaction costs, and facilitate faster payments. However, challenges such as price volatility, regulatory uncertainty, technical literacy gaps, fraud risks, and liquidity constraints were prominent. The study further finds that cryptocurrency adoption has influenced savings behavior, with many respondents using digital assets as alternative savings vehicles despite conversion difficulties. The study concludes that while cryptocurrency adoption promotes financial inclusion and autonomy among low- and middle-income earners, it simultaneously exposes users to substantial economic risks. The findings underscore the need for balanced regulatory frameworks, financial literacy initiatives, and infrastructural support to ensure that cryptocurrency adoption contributes sustainably to economic stability in semi-urban communities.

Keywords

Cryptocurrencies, financial stability digital, low- and medium-income earner

Downloads

References

1. Adamu, T. H, (2020), Macroeconomic Implication of the Increase in Prices on Economic Welfare: The Nigeria Experience. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM). Volume 2, Issue 11, pp: 29-36, ISSN: 2395-5252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akinwolere, B. C., Magaji, S., & Sani Bariki Sabiu, B. (2025). Analysis of socio-economic determinants of child labour in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(11), 5177–5188. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinwolere B.C, Abdul A., Sani A., AbdulRasaq J., Afolabi M. K., Abubakar S.B, Salawu S., Ibrahim U.A., I & Ibrahim Iliyasu. (2025). Impact Of Digital Transformation and Inflation on Economic Resilience in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Nigeria. Internation Journal of Economics Education Research (IJEER), 8(1), 61-76. https://journals.iafee.org/index.php/ijeer/article/view/301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach. Technology in Society, 62, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Antonopoulos, A. M. (2017). Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking digital cryptocurrencies (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Awogbemi, C. A., Ilori, A. K., Dayo, K. V., Akinwolere, C. B., & Oyeyemi, G. M. (2025). Detecting fraud transactions in financial institutions using multivariate statistical techniques. Advance Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(4), 57–65. Retrieved from https://aspjournals.net/ajset/index.php/ajset/article/view/128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, 54, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2021, February 5). Letter to banks on cryptocurrency transactions. https://www.cbn.gov.ng/Out/2021/CCD/Letter%20on%20Crypto.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2022). Nigeria payments system vision 2025. https://www.cbn.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2024). Adoption of the eNaira: Issues and the way forward. https://www.cbn.gov.ng/Out/2024/RSD/Adoption%20of%20the%20eNaira%20Issues%20and% 20the%20way%20forward.pdf\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chukwuere, J. E. (2021). The e-Naira: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 72–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Drescher, D. (2017). *Blockchain basics: A non-technical introduction in 25 steps*. Apress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ejiogu, A., Okechukwu, E., & Ejiogu, C. (2020). Nigerian fintech and the financial inclusion gender gap. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 28(3), 415–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R., & Putniņš, T. J. (2019). Sex, drugs, and bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1798–1853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hayes, A. S. (2018). Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to cost of production model. Journal of Alternative Investments, 20(3), 41–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. International Monetary Fund. (2023, July 18). Crypto needs comprehensive policies to protect economies and investors. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/07/18/crypto-needs-comprehensive-policies-toprotect-economies-and-investors [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Krombholz, K., Judmayer, A., Gusenbauer, M., & Weippl, E. (2017). The other side of the coin: User experiences with Bitcoin security and privacy. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mendoza-Tello, J. C., Mora, H., Pujol-López, F. A., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Social commerce as a driver to enhance trust and intention to use cryptocurrencies for electronic payments. IEEE Access, 6, 50737– 50751. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., Khan, I., & Wang, J. (2018). Predicting the adoption of a mobile government security response system from the user’s perspective: An application of the technology acceptance model. Technology in Society, 55, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles