Augmented Reality as a Catalyst for Student Motivation in Mathematics Learning: A Conceptual Framework
Authors
Nurol Fatihah binti Kamaruddin
Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, 43650, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, 43650, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200485
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 6643-6649
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-25
Accepted: 2026-03-02
Published: 2026-03-17
Abstract
Low levels of student motivation continue to negatively affect engagement and achievement in Mathematics. Augmented Reality (AR) has emerged as a promising educational technology capable of enhancing students’ interest and motivation through interactive, visual, and immersive learning experiences. This concept paper explores the role of AR as a catalyst for improving student motivation in Mathematics learning, grounded in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which emphasizes the fulfilment of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The paper analyses how AR features support motivational development, discusses challenges associated with AR implementation in Mathematics education, and proposes strategies to strengthen its integration in classroom practice. The discussion suggests that well-planned AR integration can promote student-centered learning, enhance engagement and create more meaningful Mathematics learning experiences. The findings of this paper provide valuable insights for educators and policymakers seeking to leverage AR as an effective pedagogical strategy to improve student motivation in Mathematics education.
Keywords
Augmented Reality (AR); Student Motivation; Mathematics Education; Educational Technology; Self-Determination Theory
Downloads
References
1. Al Omair, H., Mendoza, A., Bodèn, M., & Baghaei, N. (2022). Augmented Reality Applications in the Classroom: Teachers’ Experience. 30th International Conference on Computers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alibraheim, E. A., Hassan, H. F., & Soliman, M. W. (2023). Efficacy of educational platforms in developing the skills of employing augmented reality in teaching mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13669 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. (2019). Tablet‐based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cetintav, G., & Yilmaz, R. (2023). The Effect of Augmented Reality Technology on Middle School Students’ Mathematic Academic Achievement, Self-Regulated Learning Skills, and Motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(7), 1483–1504. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231176022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Coimbra, MMath. T., Cardoso, T., & Mateus, A. (2015). Augmented Reality: An Enhancer for Higher Education Students in Math’s Learning? Procedia Computer Science, 67, 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Educational Resources and Technology Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2023). Digital Education Policy 2021–2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Geng, X., & Yamada, M. (2021). Exploring Intrinsic Motivation Types in Augmented Reality Systems: Differences in Technology Acceptance, Learning Performance, and Behavior. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/tale52509.2021.9678759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of Virtual and Augmented Reality for Mathematics Education: A Scoping Review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145991 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022). Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6809. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mariukhnich, T., & Mokliak, V. (2024). Effectiveness of using augmented reality technology in the educational process. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology,” 10(4), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp4.2024.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Marques, M. M., & Pombo, L. (2021). The Impact of Teacher Training Using Mobile Augmented Reality Games on Their Professional Development. Education Sciences, 11(8), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Meng Li, C., & Mydin Kutty, F. (2023). Hubungan antara Motivasi dengan Pencapaian Matematik Murid Tahun Lima. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), e002219. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Middleton, J. A., Wiezel, A., & Jansen, M. (2023). Assessing Mathematics Engagement in the Moment. Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ministry of Education, Malaysia. (2022). Programme For International Student Assessment. Ministry of Education, Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/storage/files/shares/Lain-lain/PISA/kad-laporan-pencapaian-malaysia-pisa-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mirza, T., Dutta, R., Tuli, N., & Mantri, A. (2025). Leveraging augmented reality in education involving new pedagogies with emerging societal relevance. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00877-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Moreno-Fernandez, O., Solís-Espallargas, C., Moreno-Crespo, P., & Ferreras-Listán, M. (2023). Augmented Reality and Primary Education: Linkage, Potentiality and Applicability from the Perspective of Teachers in Initial Training. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2023.488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nevrelova, N., Korenova, L., Lavicza, Z., Bruzkova, N., & Schmid, A. (2024). Enhancing digital literacy in primary education through augmented reality. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1390491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Planning and Research Division. (2023). Preliminary Report on Malaysia’s Achievement in TIMSS 2023 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Ministry of Education, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sabri, M. A., Mohamed, N. A., Mohamed, N. H., & Mohamed, N. F. (2025). Relationship between Motivation Level and Mathematics Achievement Level for Form Four Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 15(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol15.1.7.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Volioti, C., Keramopoulos, E., Sapounidis, T., Melisidis, K., Zafeiropoulou, M., Sotiriou, C., & Spiridis, V. (2022). Using Augmented Reality in K-12 Education: An Indicative Platform for Teaching Physics. Information, 13(7), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13070336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wong, J., Bayoumy, S., Freke, A., & Cabo, A. (2022). Augmented reality for learning mathematics: A pilot study with WebXR as an accessible tool. Towards a New Future in Engineering Education, New Scenarios That European Alliances of Tech Universities Open Up, 1805–1814. https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Yang, F.-Y., & Wang, H.-Y. (2023). Tracking visual attention during learning of complex science concepts with augmented 3D visualizations. Computers & Education, 193, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study