Barriers to Access and Utilization of Social Welfare Services in Nigeria’s Urban Health System: Evidence from Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC), Fct

Social welfare services are essential for addressing the non medical needs of patients within the healthcare system. However, in many urban areas of Nigeria, access to these services remains limited despite existing health policies. This study examined the barriers to access and utilization of social welfare services in health facilities in Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC), Federal Capital Territory. The study adopted a mixed methods approach, combining a survey of 184 respondents with in depth interviews of key stakeholders. Findings revealed that while services such as counselling, health education, and referral are available, financial assistance is limited. Awareness was relatively high (71.7%), yet accessibility remained moderate. Major barriers identified include financial constraints (65.2%), lack of awareness (59.8%), inadequate staffing (54.3%), and poor infrastructure (51.6%). The study concludes that structural and systemic challenges continue to hinder effective utilization of social welfare services in urban health settings. Using the Social Determinants of Health Framework, it highlights the need to address broader social and economic conditions beyond policy formulation. The paper recommends improved staffing, sustainable funding, public sensitization, and better coordination to enhance access to these vital services.

Social welfare services, healthcare access, urban health, Abuja Municipal Area Council, barriers to access, Social Determinants of Health

1. Aregbeshola, B. S., & Khan, S. M. (2022). Out of pocket payments and catastrophic health expenditure in Nigeria: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 37(4), 456–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Familusi, O. J. (2025). Highlighting the current state of the Nigeria health system post pandemic. Discover Social Science and Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Federal Ministry of Health. (2022). National health policy framework 2022–2026. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Marmot, M. (2020). Health equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 years on. BMJ, 368, m693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. National Population Commission. (2022). Population and housing census report. Abuja: NPC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nigeria Health Watch. (2024). Beyond a building: Overcoming barriers to accessing primary healthcare in urban communities. Nigeria Health Watch. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. World Bank. (2023). Nigeria human capital public expenditure review. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. World Health Organization. (2021). Social determinants of health and universal health coverage. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Yautama, B., & Sylvanus, H. B. (2025). Assessment of the accessibility of healthcare facilities in Bwari Area Council, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study