Benefits of Information and Communication Technology in Managing Student Discipline: A Mixed‑Methods Study From Rural Kenya

Authors

Janet Mwoburi Maore

Meru University of Science and Technology (Kenya)

Hilda Omae

Meru University of Science and Technology (Kenya)

Mercy Thuranira

Meru University of Science and Technology (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700190

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 2780-2790

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-12

Accepted: 2026-07-17

Published: 2026-07-28

Abstract

Student indiscipline remains a persistent challenge in Kenyan secondary schools, manifesting in absenteeism, violence, and destruction of property. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) offers potential solutions, yet empirical evidence on its perceived benefits for discipline management is limited, particularly in rural contexts. This study investigated the benefits of ICT tools in promoting student discipline in public secondary schools in Igembe North Sub County, Meru County, Kenya. A descriptive cross sectional survey was conducted with 241 respondents comprising principals, deputy principals, teachers, and school captains. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire with Likert scale items measuring five benefit dimensions, and qualitative data were gathered through open ended questions. Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, rankings) and thematic analysis were employed. The highest ranked benefit was improved monitoring of student behaviour (M = 3.15, SD = 0.68), followed by enhanced timely reporting and feedback (M = 3.05, SD = 0.64) and better record keeping (M = 2.98, SD = 0.62). Qualitative themes included faster response to misconduct, easier record retrieval, and quicker parent teacher communication. A mean of 6.2 discipline cases were managed using ICT, indicating active but variable use. The benefits variable demonstrated a perfect normal fit on Q Q plot, supporting parametric assumptions. However, benefits were unevenly experienced across schools and stakeholder positions; teachers rated benefits higher than principals, and preventive benefits (early identification of at risk students) were lowest ranked. The study concludes that while ICT benefits are clearly perceived, they remain process oriented and contingent on infrastructure, training, and contextual factors. Recommendations include sustained professional development and investment in proactive ICT applications.

Keywords

ICT benefits, student discipline, school management, monitoring, timely reporting, parent teacher communication, Kenyan secondary schools

Downloads

References

1. Atieno, J., & Kinyanjui, B. (2023). Effects of technology application on student discipline in public secondary schools in Nakuru County, Kenya. East African Journal of Education Studies, 6(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: Empirical evidence from French universities. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 4825–4851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Davison, C. B., et al. (2022). School discipline and holistic student development. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(3), 289–305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gathumbi, A., & Mulwa, D. (2019). Collective responsibility and student indiscipline in Kenyan secondary schools. African Journal of Education, 7(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jagaba, A. M. (2020). Web based e discipline systems in U.S. public schools: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(4), 501–520. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kaweesi, F., et al. (2023). Student welfare and indiscipline in Ugandan secondary schools. African Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University lecturers’ perceptions of barriers to digital technology use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 183–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2021). Introduction to linear regression analysis (6th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Njagi, J., Nyakundi, E., & Oigara, T. (2024). ICT support for student discipline management in Nyandarua North Sub County, Kenya. Kenyan Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okoth, J. (2020). Timeliness and effectiveness of disciplinary interventions in Kenyan secondary schools. African Journal of Educational Management, 18(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Omotayo, F. O., & Chigbundu, C. (2019). ICT use for school administration in Nigerian secondary schools: The role of task technology fit. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3421–3440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Otieno, P. (2023). Effects of technological applications on student discipline in Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Oyedokun, G., & Oladesu, E. (2022). Mobile phone misuse and examination malpractice in Nigerian schools. Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Razak, N. A., et al. (2018). Successful ICT integration in Malaysian public schools: An activity systems analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Saman, M. S., & Bakar, K. A. (2019). E discipline platforms in schools: A review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 14(5), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sebar, N., & Ismail, R. (2021). ICT and discipline management in Saudi Arabia: The national e discipline platform. Middle East Educational Review, 12(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shahlal, N., Isa, N., & Kechek, N. (2021). Web based e discipline systems in Malaysian schools: A qualitative study. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 99–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sikubwabo, D., & Habihirwe, E. (2022). Mixed results of CCTV and SMS alerts for discipline management in African schools. Rwandan Journal of Education, 6(1), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Temitayo, D., Mohammed, A., & Ajibola, O. (2019). Escalating learner misconduct in South African high schools. South African Journal of Education, 39(4), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Usman, A. (2019). Disciplinary problems in Nigerian secondary schools: The need for intervention. Nigerian Educational Review, 11(2), 65–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles