Beyond Gender Responsiveness: Assessing Women's Land Rights in the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and Economic Community of West African States Agricultural Policy (ECOWAP)

Women in Africa continue to have unequal access to and control over agricultural land and feel insecure in their rights to it. This is one of the greatest hurdles for gender equality and for changing the face of agriculture in the continent. This study examines whether two key regional development programmes, the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and the Economic Community of West African States Agricultural Policy (ECOWAP), address gender inequality in land rights beyond the rhetoric and actually challenge the patriarchal systems that limit women's rights to land. An adapted version of the Gender in Agricultural Policies Analysis Tool (GAPo) was used, but in this case, it was expanded to a more in-depth analysis of gender-transformative issues, including discriminatory social norms, patriarchal institutions, customary land tenure, inheritance systems, women's participation in land governance, and accountability mechanisms. The study evaluated the CAADP Kampala Declaration, in conjunction with the CAADP Ten-Year Strategy and Action Plan (2026-2035), and the ECOWAP 2025 Strategic Policy Framework on their own against 23 criteria. The results are quite clear and indicate a significant difference between the two. Gender responsive language on women's participation, empowerment, and access to land is included in CAADP, but there is relatively little language on women's ownership, control, land governance, customary tenure, and inheritance. ECOWAP is much less robust: 78% of the criteria were rated as being gender-blind and there are no provisions in ECOWAP that are specifically about gendered land rights at the framework level. Both frameworks fall short on all measures of being gender transformative. Most importantly, neither challenges patriarchy, customary land systems or inheritance rules, which are still perpetuating women's land inequality. To sum up, while the current regional agricultural policies are increasing women's participation and access, they do not question the institutions and power dynamics that shape land ownership and control. The study recommends more specific land-rights goals, disaggregated indicators by sex, gender-sensitive financing, harmonisation of statutory and customary law, and increased representation of women in land governance and improved accountability mechanisms in the implementation of CAADP and ECOWAP.

CAADP; ECOWAP; Gender Responsive; Patriarchal Land Tenure; Women's Land Rights

1. Acosta, M., Osorio, M., Valverde, I., Vilimelis, S., Polli, M., Stloukal, L., & Phillips, L. M. (2025). Gender-responsiveness of agricultural policy: An analysis in low- and middle-income countries. Global Food Security, 44, 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adekunle, C. P., Tolorunju, E. T., Oladele, O. S., & Coster, A. S. (2024). Rural women's bargaining over land ownership: Evidence from arable crop farming households in Southwest, Nigeria. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 12(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249241233065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. African Union. (2024). 4th CAADP Biennial Review Report and Post-Malabo Roadmap. African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. African Union. (2025). Kampala CAADP Declaration on Building Resilient and Sustainable Agrifood Systems in Africa. African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. African Union. (2025). CAADP Strategy and Action Plan: 2026–2035 (Building resilient and sustainable agrifood systems in Africa). African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Agarwal, B. (2003). Gender and land rights revisited: Exploring new prospects via the State, family and market. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1–2), 184–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Andersson Djurfeldt, A., & Sircar, S. (2018). Gendered land rights and access to land in countries experiencing declining farm sizes. AgriFoSe2030 Reports 6. ISBN: 978-91-576-9566-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Behr, D. M., Groussard, H., Khaitina, V., & Shen, L. (2023). Women's land rights in sub-Saharan Africa: Where do we stand in practice? Global Indicators Brief No. 23. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099432211092367495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. CARE. (2021). Gender Transformative Programming Guidance. CARE USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform. (2020). Gender Transformative Approaches: A review of evidence and practice for agriculture. CGIAR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Doss, C., Kovarik, C., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A. R., & van den Bold, M. (2015). Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: Myth and reality. Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 403–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2020). Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework. Land Use Policy, 99, 105080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Economic Community of West African States. (2017). 2025 Strategic Policy Framework of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS): ECOWAP 2025 Strategic Policy Framework. ECOWAS Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. FAO. (2018). The gender gap in land rights. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. FAO. (2023). The status of women in agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kaaria, S., & Villani, C. (2016). The gender in agricultural policies analysis tool (GAPo). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/4fda57f2-fdf1-4764-b4f3-38924a98839e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nyabanyi, N. N., & Owusu-Ansah, J. K. (2024). Women's land access and gendered outcomes in Northern Ghana. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 12(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249241237033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Obi, H. O., & Aduma, O. C. (2020). Contemporary judicial response to women's succession and inheritance rights in Nigeria: A heave to gender discrimination. African Customary and Religious Law Review, 1, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Umukoro, B. E., Kore-Okiti, E. T., & Megbele, O. J. (2024). Customary land ownership and women's land rights in Nigeria: Extending the frontiers of feminist environmental justice. Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 4(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp040308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. USAID. (2023). Gender equality and women's empowerment policy. USAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wanjohi, W. M., & Agbere, F. (2025). The roadmap towards gender transformation in the Kampala Declaration and the CAADP Ten-Year Implementation Plan and Strategy (2026–2035). Oxfam in Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. World Bank. (2023). Women's land rights in sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar