Beyond Individual Agency: An Integrative Perspective on Human Agency Throughexistential Philosophy, Social Psychology, and Filipino Psychology

Human agency is often defined as the ability to make decisions, take deliberate action, and shape one's own life. When agency is viewed primarily as an individual possession, that description is no longer complete. Individuals make decisions about relationships, groups, institutions, cultural norms, and material circumstances. In addition to incorporating a Filipino psychology perspective that centers personhood around relationality and cultural meaning, this integrative conceptual review integrates recent work in existential and humanistic psychology with social-psychological research on social agency, identity, collective action, and agency–structure relations. Conceptual fragmentation, an overemphasis on the individual agent, a lack of attention to lived meaning and responsibility, a limited integration of agency with structural conditions, and the underrepresentation of culturally grounded accounts of relational personhood are the five interrelated issues that the review identifies in the literature. Building on these gaps, the paper offers a three-dimensional framework that simultaneously understands agency as relational-social, structural-contextual, and personal-existential. Filipino ideas like kapwa, pakikipagkapwa, pagpapakatao, pagdududa, and ginhawa are employed as theoretical tools for reevaluating what an agent is and how agency is carried out rather than as ornamental cultural examples. The need to shift from individual-centered accounts to family agency is further supported by recent research on Filipino transnational families. The resulting model views agency as a situated process that people use to understand situations, make decisions, collaborate with others, act, face repercussions, and change their course of action. Proposals for empirical research, measurement, qualitative inquiry, cross-cultural comparison, and multilevel study are developed in this paper. It concludes that going beyond individual agency does not lessen personal accountability; rather, it situates accountability within the connections and circumstances that enable action

human agency, existential psychology, social psychology

1. Baumeister, R. F. (2025). Existential positive psychology offers fresh perspective on free will. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 20(5), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2025.2498133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bazzani, G. (2023). Agency as conversion process. Theory and Society, 52, 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09487-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bortolotti, L. (2025). In the twisted fairytale of human agency, irrational beliefs are the unlikely heroes. Society, 62, 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01108-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cavazzoni, F., Fiorini, A., & Veronese, G. (2022). How do we assess how agentic we are? A literature review of existing instruments to evaluate and measure individuals’ agency. Social Indicators Research, 159, 1125–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02791-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cervantes, C. L. (2025). Filipino psychology is a transpersonal psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678251322215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Grava, G. R., Keil, M., & Elizabeth, V. (2026). Beyond the agentic individual: Rethinking agency in transnational collectivist Filipino families. Journal of Family Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2026.2655733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Greenaway, K. H. (2024). How group life makes personal agency possible. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 70, pp. 83–136). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Labor, P. D. P., & Gastardo-Conaco, M. C. C. (2021). Viewing your kapwa: Elaboration of a social-relational construct through language. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(4), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i4.418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Le Besnerais, A. L., Moore, J. W., Berberian, B., & Grynszpan, O. (2024). Sense of agency in joint action: A critical review of we-agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1331084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Maninang, J. (2025). On kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. Philosophia: A Journal of the Department of Philosophy Xavier University-Ateneo de Cagayan, 3(1), 5–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. A. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Phillips, J., & Plunkett, D. (2024). How does human agency actually work? On Bratman’s “core capacity thesis” and the relation between philosophy of action and the empirical sciences. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 41(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Salvador, D. L. A., & Mendoza, G.-G. V. (2026). Key constructs and processes of a Filipino existential psychotherapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678251413801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Garthoff, J., & Bentley, R. A. (2022). Agency and identity in the collective self. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211065921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Silver, C. A., Tatler, B. W., Chakravarthi, R., & Timmermans, B. (2021). Social agency as a continuum. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 434–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01845-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tomasello, M. (2025). Agency and intentionality. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 62, 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Williams, R. N., Gantt, E. E., & Fischer, L. (2021). Agency: What does it mean to be a human being? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 693077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yanchar, S. C. (2024). Human agency in the tensional space of existence. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678241255715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhao, S. (2022). Human agency and social structure: From the evolutionary perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(3), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Aristotelian Ethics and Moral Development: A Critical Evaluation
• Decolonising Africa’s Higher Education against violence and social injustices.
• The African Child as a Technological Citizen
• Mathematics as Ontological–Cognitive Participation: Reconstructing Ethical and Metaphysical Foundations within a Humanized Mathematical Universe
• Reason–Emotion Integration in the Context of Artificial Intelligence: The Implications of Aristotle’s Conception of Happiness for Youth Moral Education