Beyond the Façade of Inclusion: Rethinking Special and Inclusive Education Models
Authors
Higher School of Technology, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco (Morocco)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601053
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 14964-14969
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-24
Accepted: 2026-06-29
Published: 2026-07-11
Abstract
Globally, the push for the inclusion of students with disabilities (SWDs) in mainstream classrooms has been increasingly promoted. This is justified by it being an educational, social, and human right. While, from afar, inclusion looks beneficial, practitioners question its implementation, effectiveness, and appropriateness for all learners. This qualitative study explores how special education teachers, administrators, and paraprofessionals perceive special and inclusive education in practice. Using open-ended interviews with 12 stakeholders in a Southeastern United States public middle school, the study explores participants’ perspectives on full inclusion, the challenges that hinder its success, and the alternatives they believe would better support SWDs. Findings reveal participants’ support for inclusion in principle but strong reservations regarding the one-size-fits-all approach that disregards individual student needs. Participants emphasized the importance of flexibility, individualized instruction, accurate diagnosis, teacher training, and the continued existence of self-contained classrooms. Drawing on Hornby's (2015) concept of "inclusive special education," the paper calls for a balanced framework that integrates the complementary strengths of both educational models.
Keywords
inclusive education, special education, disability, self-contained classrooms, individualized instruction
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cooper, P., & Jacobs, B. (2011). From inclusion to engagement: Helping students engage with schooling through policy and practice. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Dunne, L. (2009). Discourses of inclusion: A critique. Power and Education, 1(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2009.1.1.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fuchs, D., Gilmour, A. F., & Wanzek, J. (2025). Reframing the most important special education policy debate in 50 years: How versus where to educate students with disabilities in America's schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 58(4), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251315196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hornby, G. (2015). Inclusive special education: Development of a new theory for the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hornby, G., & Kauffman, J. M. (2021). Special and inclusive education: Perspectives, challenges and prospects. Education Sciences, 11(7), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hornby, G., & Kauffman, J. M. (2023). Special education's zombies and their consequences. Support for Learning, 38(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kauffman, J. M., Anastasiou, D., Badar, J., Travers, J. C., & Wiley, A. L. (2017). Inclusive education moving forward. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 329–344). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Warnock, M. (2005). Special educational needs: A new look. Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Wilcox, G., Fernandez, C. C., & Kowbel, A. (2021). Using evidence-based practice and data-based decision making in inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study