Beyond the Textbook: Using Comic Strips to Teach Business Law to Non-Law Students

Authors

Hariati Mansor

Faculty of Law; Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Noraziah Abu Bakar

School of Law & Prosecutorial Science, ELMU University, 71760 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan (Malaysia)

Rezashah Mohd Salleh

Norman Fahmi & Associates, Negeri Sembilan. (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0554

Subject Category: Law

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 7526-7534

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-16

Accepted: 2026-08-21

Published: 2026-09-05

Abstract

Teaching Business Law to non-law students presents several challenges due to the nature of the subject which involves abstract concepts, complex terminology and students’ perception that the subject lacks relevance to their field. Traditional lecture-based approaches alone may be insufficient to sustain engagement or to assist their understanding of the complexities of business law. Hence, this article aims to explore the use of comic strips as a visual -narrative teaching tool to compliment the traditional lecture-based method. Using Dual Coding Theory (DCT) and Constructivist Approaches, it examines how comic may simplify the teaching of legal concepts, demonstrate the application of the legal principle in practice and accommodate diverse learning styles. The study involved 16 Business and Management students who had previously failed the course and the results showed improvement in their academic performance which provide preliminary evidence that the use of comic strip alongside conventional teaching may support the learning of Business Law among non-law students. The findings, however, should be interpreted as exploratory instead of causal because of the small, purposively defined sample and the absence of a controlled group. The study emphasised the potential of a meticulously designed multimodal teaching tools to make complex legal concepts more accessible while maintaining the accuracy of legal doctrine and the structural approach of legal analysis.

Keywords

Business Law, comic strips, visual learning, non-law students, innovative multimodal tools, student performance

Downloads

References

1. Abezin, D. (2024). Law and cartoons: The use of new interactive approach in legal teaching disciplines. Journal of Legal Studies & Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Hafidz, M., & Arifin, Z. (2019). The Effectivity of Snowball Throwing Learning Model Viewed from the Activeness and the Achievement of Students at Vocational High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Botes, A. (2016). Using comics to communicate legal contract cancellation. The Comics Grid. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. de Silva, N., & Cowap, P. (2007). The teaching of law to non-lawyers. International Conference on Construction and Building Education and Research (BEAR), CIB Task Group 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Douglas L. Nelson, Valerie S. Reed, and John R. Walling Pictorial Superiority Effect Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory Vol. 2, No. 5, 523-528 (1976) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fong, K. N., & Eow, Y. L. (2021). Comics as instructional material in learning science: Effects on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.78.83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press Friedland, S. I. (1996). How we teach: A survey of teaching techniques in American law schools. Seattle University Law Review, 20(1), 1–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giddens, T. (2012). Comics, law, and aesthetics: Towards the use of graphic fiction in legal studies. Law and Humanities, 6(1), 85–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gómez Romero, L., & Dahlman, I. (2012). Justice Framed: Law in Comics and Graphic Novels. Law Text Culture, 16, 3-20. — Note: the authors state that the theoretical and ideological partnership between law and comics remains “an odd rarity”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Greenbaum, J. (2020, November 5). Lawyer and CPD instructor uses comics to contextualize and broaden discussions on race and racism. Law Times News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kariyawasam, K., & Low, G. (2014). Teaching business law to non-law students, culturally and linguistically diverse (‘CaLD’). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 11(2), Article 9. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1040738.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Khan, H. A. (2021). Business students’ perspective of learning law education. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(10). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i10.5407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kurniawan, D. A., & Nurhadi, D. (2019). The effectiveness of comic media in science learning: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. HarperCollins: New York, NY. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mursolimah, M., Slamet, St., Y. & Roemintoy, R. (2025). The Potential of the Application of Digital Strip Comic Media to Writing Skills Reviewed from Learning Interest. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies SHEs: Conference Series 8 (1), 141 – 150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Phoon, Z. Y. (2021). The role of comics as an aid in teaching elementary school science on the topic of Plant Systems. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, x(x), xx-xx. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx (particular case). journal.lppmunindra.ac.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Poon, J. P. H., & Kong, W. H. (2014). Perception of non-law students on the combined lecture- and problem-based learning approaches. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.23009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Razak, F. A., Osoman, M. N., & Patel, F. (2020). Teaching law to non-law background students: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i5/7233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smith, L., & Johnson, R. (2021). Experiential learning through popular multimedia: integrating fiction, poetry, and comics in legal education. Journal of Legal Education, 70(4), 612–639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sousa, D. A. (2011). How the brain learns (4th ed.). Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Spanjaard, E., Batty, E., & Endeshaw, H. (2023). Using legal visualization to teach law to business and non-law students. International Journal of Law Education, 15(2), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Suh, S. (2023). Cheat sheet for teaching programming with comics: Through the lens of concept-language-procedure framework. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00464 arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Times Higher Education. (2022, May 17). Picture this! Teaching difficult concepts through comics. Times Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Topkaya, Y., Batdı, V., Durmuş, B., & Özkaya, A. (2023). The effectiveness of using comics in education: A meta-analytic and meta-thematic analysis study. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (AKEF Dergisi), 5(3), 922-940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vilaça, G. V. (2021). World-making, legal education, and the Saga comic book. Law, Culture and the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx — argues for comics in legal education as a novel or disruptive pedagogy. PMC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vilaça, G. V. (2022). Worldmaking, legal education, and the Saga comic book series. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(5), 2143–2165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wenqing, W. & Chenxi, L. (2024). The current situation and practical strategies of literacy: College law comics focus. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 7(10), 58–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wooten, J. O., & Cuevas, J. A. (2024). The effects of dual coding theory on social studies vocabulary and comprehension in elementary education. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(4), 673-691. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles