Beyond Traditional Policing: Community Residents’ Perspectives on the Smart Policing Strategies of the Philippine National Police

Smart policing is a modern approach using data and technology for effective law enforcement, a significant shift from controlling enslaved populations to community-focused methods. This evolution, marked by increasing pressures on public policing is not just fragmentation but part of a long-term trend towards formalizing social control. As urban areas expand and crime rates vary, the demand for more innovative policing methods becomes crucial (Mogul, 2021). Therefore, current changes in policing should be understood within this broader historical context of social control becoming more structured over time.
Commonly, In the Philippines, the Philippine National Police (PNP) has adopted smart policing strategies to enhance public safety and combat crime effectively. Traditionally, police patrols serve as the first line of defense, but modern law enforcement has increasingly embraced community-oriented policing, fostering collaboration between officers and local residents to address security concerns proactively. This approach aims to build trust and strengthen police-community partnerships, ensuring that crime prevention is rooted in engagement rather than reactive measures. By prioritizing proactive crime prevention, smart policing significantly improves community-police relationships and promotes a heightened sense of security in neighborhoods (Manalo, 2021). Despite its implementation, crime remains a challenge in the country.
In the Philippines, Republic Act No. 6975 (1990), which established the Philippine National Police (PNP), mandates the modernization of law enforcement agencies to improve efficiency and effectiveness. It is responsible for ensuring that police officers act with professionalism, transparency, and accountability, always prioritizing public safety over personal gain. The law mandates that officers undergo continuous training, adapt to technological advancements, and follow ethical standards in all their duties.
To reinforce crime prevention efforts, the NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 46 (2024) mandates government agencies and local government units to support the National Crime Prevention Program, which aligns with smart policing principles by advocating strategic and preventive measures. Additionally, various NAPOLCOM memoranda provide comprehensive guidelines on police operations, recruitment, and disciplinary procedures, ensuring that law enforcement upholds ethical standards and prioritizes a community-centered approach to policing.
In the specific local of Cebu City, it is quite noted that numerous amounts of crimes have occurred and we could say that there is lacking in the policing system. In recent times, Cebu City has experienced numerous initiatives focused on modernizing police practices, including the implementation of crime mapping and predictive policing (Estudillo and Cagayan, 2023). The shocking news about violent crimes were definitely unsettling. Even though the police caught the people involved, it makes you realize that this kind of things can still happen anywhere in the city. It highlights the need for continued efforts to ensure our safety and prevent future incidents.
Being a future criminologist, the researchers would like to conduct an in-depth study centered on smart policing. With the topic at hand, given that there are numerous studies regarding this, we would like to make it more locally appreciated study in our specific environment. This will not only beneficial for the community residents, but also law enforcement agencies and local government.

Beyond, Community Residents’, National Police

1. Book [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boeije, H. (2009). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage Publications. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Paley, J. (2016). Phenomenology as qualitative research: A critical analysis of meaning attribution. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Palma, E. A., & Tadiar, M. C. (2020). The role of technology in modern policing: Examining the Philippine National Police. Philippine Journal of Public Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Republic Act No. 6975. (1990). An act establishing the Philippine National Police under a reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government, and for other purposes. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1990/12/13/republic-act-no-6975/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sabater, R. S. (2019). Community policing in the Philippines: Building bridges between police and society. Asian Journal of Criminology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Weisburd, D. (2015). The importance of police practices: Linking police strategy and crime is good for the policeman, too. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Afzal, M., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2020). Smart policing: A critical review of the literature. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12219, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Alincastre, J. B., & Dalugdog, R. B. (2023). Internal stakeholders’ evaluation of the Philippine National Police electronic-project systems. IIARI International Journal of Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Braga, A. A., & Schnell, C. (2013). Evaluating place-based policing strategies. Police Quarterly, 16(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611113491965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chan, J. B. (2001). The technological game: How information technology istransforming police practice. Criminal Justice, 1(2), 139–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dela Cruz, R., Santos, J., & Villanueva, E. (2021). Crime mapping in the Philippines: A tool for effective policing. Journal of Crime and Justice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ekaabi, M. A., Khalid, K., Davidson, R., Kamarudin, A. H., & Preece, C. (2020). Smart policing service quality: Conceptualisation, development, and validation. Policing: An International Journal, 43(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2020-0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Elphick, R., Button, M., Shepherd, D., & Park, D. (2021). Building trust in digital policing: A scoping review of community policing apps. Police Practice and Research, 23(4), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.1884391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Escalona, M. B. (2020). E-policing in the PNP Laoag City Police Station: Case study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Llena, E. A., & Bagtaso, M. M. A. (2024). Implementation of national police clearance system. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Manalo, E. P. (2021). Community trust in police: Evaluation of smart policing strategies. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 5(1).* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Maranga, M. S. (2023). Policing the territorial waters of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 5(2), 18–26.* Sandelowski, M. (1997). “To be of use”: Enhancing the utility of qualitative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. research. Nursing Outlook, 45(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(97)80013-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sarrico, C. S., Ferreira, L. D., & Silva, L. F. (2013). Polqual: Measuring service quality in police traffic services. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-08-2013-0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00437.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Smith, J., & Park, L. (2023). Rethinking police funding: A new approach to community safety. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 45–60.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Taylor, A. (2021). The impact of the George Floyd case on policing in America. American Journal of Sociology, 127(2), 123–140.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Weisburd, D. (2015). The importance of police practices: Linking police strategy and crime is good for the policeman, too. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Internet Source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ali, S. M., Damaso, M. M., & Dela Peña, V. M., Jr. (2020). Policing the cyberspace: Cybersecurity management. Philippine Public Safety College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Congress of the Philippines. (1990). Republic Act No. 6975. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Congress of the Philippines. (1998). Republic Act No. 8551. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Congress of the Philippines. (2003). Republic Act No. 9208. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Congress of the Philippines. (2012). Republic Act No. 10173. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Congress of the Philippines. (2018). Republic Act No. 10973. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Leikuma-Rimicane, D., Calica, M. C., & Enriquez, J. A. (2023). Location and type of crimes in the Philippines. arXiv. https://arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Mamalian, C. A. (2014). The use of computerized crime mapping. National Institute of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. National Police Commission. (2024). Memorandum Circular No. 46: National Crime Prevention Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Reyes, L. M., & Santos, J. D. (2024). E-policing in the PNP Laoag City Police Station. Scribd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sachdeva, N., & Kumaraguru, P. (2014). Online social media and police in India. arXiv. https://arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Sachdeva, N., & Kumaraguru, P. (2015). Characterising behavior and emotions on social media. arXiv. https://arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study