Bioclimatic Design as a Strategy for Thermal Comfort in Academic Buildings: A Focus on Caleb University Architecture Building

Thermal discomfort remains a critical challenge in academic buildings located in tropical climates, where high temperatures, intense solar radiation, and humidity significantly affect user comfort and productivity. This study investigates bioclimatic design as a sustainable strategy for enhancing thermal comfort in academic environments, with a specific focus on the Architecture Building at Caleb University, Lagos State, Nigeria.
The research adopts a case study approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods, including site observation, user perception surveys, and environmental assessment of building orientation, materials, ventilation, and surrounding landscape elements. Findings reveal that inadequate shading, poor building orientation, heat-retaining materials, and insufficient integration of passive cooling strategies contribute significantly to thermal discomfort within and around the building.
The study demonstrates that bioclimatic design strategies—such as optimized building orientation, enhanced natural ventilation, integration of vegetation, use of climate-responsive materials, and shading systems—can significantly improve both indoor and outdoor thermal conditions.
The research concludes that adopting a holistic bioclimatic design approach is essential for improving thermal comfort, reducing energy dependence, and enhancing the overall environmental quality of academic buildings in tropical regions.

Academic Buildings, Bioclimatic Design

1. Afolabi, A., Lawal, Q. A., & Babamboni, A. S. (2026). Landscape design as a tool for sustainable school environments: Evaluating its impact on learning and community use in Ikorodu public secondary schools. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2(1), 197–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. ASHRAE. (2017). Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy (ASHRAE Standard 55). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babamboni, A. S., Ogunleye, V. T., Ajayi, O. O., & Oladipo, A. D.-A. (2025). Urban parks and user well-being in Lagos State: Evaluating adequacy in selected LGAs. African Journal of Environmental Sciences and Renewable Energy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brown, R. D., & Gillespie, T. J. (1995). Microclimatic landscape design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Emmanuel, R. (2005). Climate-sensitive design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Givoni, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Olgyay, V. (1963). Design with climate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Oke, T. R. (1987). Boundary layer climates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Santamouris, M. (2015). Energy and Buildings, 98, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Re-Validating the Uniqueness of Urban Morphology of the Shekhawati Region Through Reconnaissance Using Hotspot Analysis
• Golden Ages and Emerging Needs: Rethinking old Age Homes as Self Sustained Communities
• The Missing Link between Colonial Jack Arch Roofing and Indigenous Construction Practices in India
• Archiving Kolakopa - A Study on the Present Condition and the Architectural Features of an Evanescing Historic Settlement.
• Analysing Vendor Lock-In in Serverless Architectures