Bridging Innovation and Practice: Female Educators’ Engagement with Artificial Intelligence in Zimbabwean Higher Education

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping higher education, creating opportunities to enhance teaching, learning, assessment, research and administration while raising concerns about equity, ethics and institutional preparedness. This study explores female educators’ experiences of AI use in Zimbabwean higher education. Using a qualitative-dominant exploratory mixed-methods design, data were collected through an online survey of 40 female educators and two focus group discussions involving 13 female lecturers from two universities. Findings show that participants primarily viewed AI as a practical and assistive technology supporting lesson preparation, assignment design, research, presentations, plagiarism checking and administrative tasks. Survey results indicated that 53.8% reported moderate AI understanding, 30.8% high understanding and 7.7% very high understanding, while 77.5% supported AI integration in higher education. Participants valued AI for saving time, improving efficiency, supporting differentiated learning and expanding access to information. However, concerns included overreliance, weakened critical thinking, fabricated citations, academic dishonesty, privacy, inadequate training, poor connectivity, limited infrastructure and financial constraints. The study does not claim gender differences in AI use but highlights how participating women experience AI within gendered professional and institutional conditions. The study concludes that responsible AI integration in Zimbabwean higher education requires AI literacy, ethical guidance, reliable infrastructure, affordable access and gender-responsive institutional support.

Artificial intelligence, female educators, higher education, Zimbabwe

1. Ahmad, S., Alam, M., Rahmat, M., Mubarik, M., & Hyder, S. (2022). Academic and administrative role of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54, 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aruleba, K. D., Jere, N., & Matarirano, O. (2023). An Evaluation of Technology Adoption During Remote Teaching and Learning at Tertiary Institution by Gender. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10, 1335-1346. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2022.3163912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cachero, C., Tomás, D., & Pujol, F. A. (2025). Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 25, 1 - 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3721295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chiu, T. (2023). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44, 2518–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2394886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. González-Calatayud, V., Prendes-Espinosa, P., & Roig-Vila, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence for student assessment: A systematic review. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. González-Pérez, S., Molina-López, M. M., González Rico, P., & Fernández Montesinos, G. A. (2025). Academic Self-Efficacy and Diversity during the Artificial Intelligence Era. Revista Prisma Social. https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.5940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gupta, S., Sharma, P., Vajrala, K., Fatima, A., & Sharma, N. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in education: Advancing personalized learning within ethical frameworks: An overview. EthAIca. https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in education. Interdisciplinary Journal and Humanity (INJURITY). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hashmi, N., & Bal, A. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ibrahim, M., & Elfani, M. (2025). Role of women in higher education in the digital age: Analysis of challenges and gender equality. Journal Discrimination and Injustice. https://doi.org/10.70992/f0z72p82 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Inanç, A. S., & Dündar, G. (2026). Digitalization, women’s leadership and sustainable governance in higher education. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.64211/oidaijsd190617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kalim, U., Kanwar, A., Sha, J., & Huang, R. (2025). Barriers to AI adoption for women in higher education: A systematic review of the Asian context. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00390-5 (Springer) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Karim, R. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing gender equality and women’s empowerment in academia: A conceptual framework. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 21(43), 73. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n43p73 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Karim, R. A. (2026). Women educators’ perspectives on AI in English language pedagogy in Malaysia. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(38), 72. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n38p72 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Li, X., Cheah, K. S. L., & Wong, Y. S. (2026). Gendered digital housekeeping and invisible care labor in platformed higher education. Frontiers in Sociology, 11, Article 1790117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1790117 (Frontiers) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Luvanda, A (2023) A policy framework for bridging the gender divide in digital technology courses and careers in Kenya. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/a-policy-framework-for-bridging-the-gender-divide-in-digital-technology-courses-and-careers-in-kenya/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Makudza, F., Dangaiso, P., Muparangi, S., Mtisi, E., Makiwa, N., & Makandwa, G. (2025). Leveraging climate resilience through AI chatbot farming adoption among rural Zimbabwean women. Cogent Social Sciences, 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2546520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Matobobo, O., & Matobobo, C. (2025). Exploring the impact of gender on student access to and utilization of educational technology in South African higher education: A systematic review on equity and inclusion. COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58355/competitive.v4i4.199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Meharunisa, S., Almugren, H., Sarabdeen, M., Mabrouk, F., Kijas, A. C. M., Gaskin, J., & Çivilidağ, A. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on women’s empowerment and work-life balance in Saudi educational institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1432541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mittal, U., Sai, S., Chamola, V., & Sangwan, D. (2024). A comprehensive review on generative AI for education. IEEE Access, 12, 142733–142759. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3468368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Muchowe, R., Mkandatsama, P., & Rajlal, A. (2026). The moderating role of gender and generational cohort on the effects of artificial intelligence usage and learning adaptability on the academic performance of university students in Zimbabwe. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2026.2652193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), e67670. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Onesi-Ozigagun, O., Ololade, Y., Eyo-Udo, N., & Ogundipe, D. (2024). Revolutionizing education through AI: A comprehensive review of enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Owan, V., Abang, K., Idika, D., Etta, E., & Bassey, B. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 69, 1105–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Rao, G., & Suhasini, N. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education to enhance teaching and learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rodriguez-Ortiz, M., Santana-Mancilla, P., & Anido-Rifón, L. (2025). Machine learning and generative AI in learning analytics for higher education: A systematic review of models, trends and challenges. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Samala, A., Rawas, S., Wang, T., Reed, J., Kim, J., Howard, N., & Ertz, M. (2024). Unveiling the landscape of generative artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive taxonomy of applications, challenges and future prospects. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 3239–3278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12936-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Selwyn, N. (2019). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Slijepčević, M., Popović, Š., & Šević, A. (2026). Gender perspectives: Artificial intelligence in academic practice. Research in Pedagogy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. World Bank. (2020). Remote learning and COVID-19: The use of educational technologies at scale across an education system as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Young, E., Wajcman, J., & Sprejer, L. (2023). Mind the gender gap: Inequalities in the emergent professions of artificial intelligence (AI) and data science. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., Román-González, M., & Noor, N. (2024). Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Artificial Intelligence and Academic Legitimacy: Reconceptualizing Originality, Authorship, and Ethical Use in Education