Bridging the Center-Periphery Divide: Human Rights and Public Policy in AI-Driven Learning Societies

The present study examines the effectiveness of the public policy in the context of digitally unequal environments and its impact on human rights protection in the framework of the Center-Periphery Theory and the role of AI-driven learning societies. AI's swift penetration into the field of education, governance, and public administration has raised several issues and concerns, such as digital inequality, algorithmic bias, accessibility, and social exclusion, especially in developing societies where technological resources are not equally available across various regions. This study aims to analyze the relationships between AI Accessibility, Digital Inequality, AI Governance, Public Policy Effectiveness, Human Rights Protection, and the moderating effect of an Inclusive AI-Driven Learning Society. This study was quantitative with a cross-sectional research design engaged with structured questionnaires given to digitally active respondents, such as students, teachers, policy makers, and researchers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the data in SPSS and SmartPLS to test the hypotheses presented and investigate direct relationships and moderating relationships. The results showed that AI Accessibility (β = 0.379, p = 0.000) and Digital Inequality (β = 0.385, p = 0.000) had a significant relationship with Public Policy Effectiveness, and Public Policy Effectiveness had a strong relationship with Human Rights Protection (β = 0.436, p = 0.000). The moderation effect of Inclusive AI-Driven Learning Society, however, was not statistically significant (β = -0.020 and p = 0.339). On the theoretical side, the study extends the Center-Periphery Theory to the realm of AI governance studies, while on the practical side, it draws attention to the need for inclusive policy frameworks, digital accessibility, and ethical governance of AI in the context of socially sustainable digital transformation and protection of human rights in AI-informed societies.

Artificial Intelligence, Public Policy Effectiveness, Human Rights Protection

1. Khoso, R. H., Amir, M., Farzeen, S., & Alam, S. H. A. (2025). AI in green marketing: Promoting sustainable consumer choices through artificial intelligence. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.4.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. European Parliament. (2023, June 14). MEPs ready to negotiate first-ever rules for safe and transparent AI. European Parliament Press Release. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, C., Shi, Y., Zhang, P., & Ding, C. (2021). A cross-country comparison of fiscal policy responses to the COVID-19 global pandemic. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), 262–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Khani, M. A. K., Usama, M., Shah, A. S., Shah, A., Abbas, S. H., Maqsood, A., & Laghari, A. A. (2024). Intelligent vehicle number plate recognition system using yolo for enhanced security in smart buildings. Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, 8(2), 11-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Rashid, S. A., Zaman, S. U., & Alam, S. H. (2025). Impact of retailer identity and website design on purchase intent in cross border e commerce. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.71317/RJSA.003.02.0186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khan, S. A., Samoo, S., Shah, A. S., Maqsood, A., Khani, A. K., & Shah, A. (2024). Enhancing Residential Safety and Comfort Through Smart Home Security and Automation Technologies. Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Afina, Y. (2023). AI governance must balance creativity with sensitivity. Chatham House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Romanian Government. (2022). Strategia Națională de Cercetare, Inovare și Specializare Inteligentă 2022–2027. Romanian Research Strategy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Malik, N., KaimKhani, M. A., Shaikh, A. A., Brohi, A. B., & Luhrani, A. (2023). MCQ’s Evaluation using Python OCR: An Algorithmic Implementation and Design Approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Mathematical Sciences, 2(1), 37-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Elliffe, C. (2021). Taxing the digital economy: Theory, policy and practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khoso, R. H., Alejandra, C., Muhammad, K., Alam, S. H., & Ali, N. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in marketing capabilities and customer engagement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 5(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i4.639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mughal, Z. A., Kaim, A., Ahmed, S. S., & Qazi, S. (2022). Key factors and features analysis of popular SaaS ERP Systems for Adoptability. Journal of Software Engineering, 1(1), 11-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Operational Program Capacity Administrative. (2023). Cadru strategic pentru adoptarea și utilizarea de tehnologii inovative în administrația publică 2021–2027 – soluții pentru eficientizarea activității. ADR Strategic Framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makin, A. J., & Layton, A. (2021). The global fiscal response to COVID-19: Risks and repercussions. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Făniță, A. (2023). Inteligența artificială în industria financiară. PKF Finconta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khan, S. (2025, November). Intelligent agent-driven test artifact synthesis with dynamic environmental feedback. In Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 211–227). Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sarwar, A. L., & Humair Nawaz, Z. A. (2021). Analysis Of Session Initiation Protocol With VoIP In Multimedia Conferencing System. International Journal, 10(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. European Commission. (2021a). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) COM(2021) 206 final. European Commission AI Act. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jurma, O. (2023, May 18). Este pregătită România pentru educația asistată de inteligența artificială? Republica Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dashnyam, A., Peljid, A., Natsag, B., Tseden-Ish, A., Ali, Z., Khani, M. A. K., & Hassan, S. (2025). Evaluating Block Chain Based Voting Systems: An Empirical Study on Public Administration Adoption and Challenges. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 23(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. OECD. (2022). OECD framework for the classification of AI systems. OECD Digital Economy Papers. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Economedia.ro. (2023, November 6). Ministrul Digitalizării estimează că instrumentele de inteligență artificială vor duce la o creștere a colectării de TVA cu până la 1%. Economedia Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lopez Cobo, M., & De Prato, G. (Eds.). (2022). AI Watch Index 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Clark, J., Murdick, D., Perset, K., & Grobelnik, M. (2022). The OECD framework for classifying AI systems to assess policy challenges and ensure international standards in AI. OECD AI Classification. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Aziz, S., Khan, S. A., Shah, A. S., Khani, M. A. K., Maqsood, A., & Shah, A. (2026). Intelligent Survivor Detection System for Post-Earthquake Rescue Operations Using IoT and Sensor-Based Monitoring. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Romanian Government. (2021a). Strategia Națională pentru ocuparea forței de muncă 2022–2027. Romanian Employment Strategy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pascu, C., & Lourenco, M. B. (2023). Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity research. ENISA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kamal, M. H., Zaman, S. U., Alam, S. H., Iqbal, M., & Dashnyam, A. (2024). Sustaining Pakistan’s economy through strategic gas planning and predictive analytics. ILMA Journal of Social Sciences & Economics, 5(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Bamboat, M. A., Laghari, A. A., Li, H., Khan, A. A., & Qaimkhani, M. A. (2024, August). Quality of Experience Assessment of Over the Top Services. In 2024 4th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Information Security (ICBCTIS) (pp. 145-149). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Autoritatea pentru Digitalizarea României. (2023). Autoritatea pentru Digitalizarea României a lansat dezbaterea privind necesitatea şi opţiunile de reglementare în domeniul inteligenţei artificiale. ADR Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Raza, M., Zaman, S. U., Alam, S. H., & Furqan, M. (2025). Role of brand awareness and perceived quality in digital advertisement. The Asian Bulletin of Big Data Management, 5(1), 44–74. https://doi.org/10.62019/abbdm.v5i1.302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Neagu, L. (2021). Doar 6% dintre companiile din România folosesc aplicații cu inteligență artificială. Economica.net. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shah, A. S., Akbar, F., Khani, M. A. K., Maqsood, A., & Bukhari, F. S. (2025). Utilizing a Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture For Salat Posture Detection. J. ICT des. eng. technol. sci, 9(1), 16-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. European Commission. (2021b). The European Fiscal Board assesses the appropriate fiscal stance for the euro area in 2022. European Commission Fiscal Board. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Shah, A. S., Khani, M. A. K., Nasir, H., Lajis, A., Shah, A., & Laghari, A. A. (2025). Major global digital policy frameworks. In Cyber Security, Forensics and National Security (pp. 359-377). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Planul National de Redresare si Rezilienta. (2021). Romanian Government PNRR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării și Digitalizării. (2023). România are un Consiliu științific și de etică în inteligența artificială. MCID Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Financialintelligence.ro. (2023, September 20). Studiu: 75% dintre companii cred că organizaţia cu cea mai avansată inteligenţă artificială generativă câştigă. Financial Intelligence Romania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shah, A. S., Dinesh, A., Shah, A., Farooq, M., Maqsood, A., & Khani, M. A. K. (2024). Smart Gas Leak Detection And Emergency Response System Using Iot For Homes. Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, 8(1), 18-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Universitatea Tehnică din Cluj-Napoca. (2021). Elaborarea cadrului strategic național în domeniul inteligenței artificiale: Raport de consultare generativă. UTCN AI Strategy Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Romanian Government. (2021b). Strategia de securitate cibernetică a României pentru perioada 2022–2027. Romanian Cybersecurity Strategy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ali, H., Khani, M. A. K., Shah, A. S., Laghari, A. A., & Minam, M. (2025). Smart Class Analytics for Assessing Group Understandingvia Facial Expressions. Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Robotic Applications, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Khoso, R. H., Alejandra, C., Faheem, M., & Alam, S. H. A. (2025). Ethical intelligence in digital marketing: The interplay of algorithmic bias, transparency, and data privacy on consumer trust. Journal for Social Science Archives, 3(2), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i2.433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark