Bridging the Trust Gap: A Review of Public Perception Studies on Police Integrity
Authors
Department of Political Science, School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), 11800Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, and Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100137
Subject Category: Public Service
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 1700-1712
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-07
Accepted: 2025-11-14
Published: 2025-12-02
Abstract
Public perception of police integrity has emerged as a critical concern for governments and law enforcement agencies, particularly in the context of increasing public scrutiny, high-profile incidents of misconduct, and declining trust in policing institutions worldwide. Integrity, encompassing fairness, transparency, and accountability, forms the foundation of police legitimacy. Yet, perceptions of integrity remain uneven across societies, shaped by cultural, institutional, and experiential factors. This study addresses the need for a systematic understanding of how police integrity is perceived, the factors influencing these perceptions, and the consequences for public trust and legitimacy. The aim of this study is to analyse the research landscape on public perceptions of police integrity through a data-driven review using Scopus AI analytics. The methodology involved systematic mapping of published literature, drawing on outputs such as summary and expanded synthesis, concept maps, topic expert identification, and the detection of emerging themes. This approach enabled a comprehensive overview of scholarly patterns, comparative perspectives, and thematic developments in the field. Findings reveal that perceptions of police integrity are consistently influenced by procedural justice, officer characteristics, accountability mechanisms, and media representations. Comparative studies highlight cross-national variations, with integrity understood and evaluated differently across cultural and political contexts. Consequential studies show that negative perceptions significantly undermine trust, legitimacy, and willingness to cooperate with law enforcement, while accountability and procedural fairness enhance confidence. Emerging themes indicate growing scholarly attention to media narratives, technological accountability tools such as body-worn cameras, and the role of transparency in digital societies. The implications of this review are both theoretical and practical. Theoretically, it reinforces the centrality of procedural justice frameworks while emphasizing the need for cross-cultural refinement. Practically, it underscores the importance of investing in accountability reforms, cultural competence training, and media engagement strategies to bridge the trust gap. Collectively, the study contributes to an integrated understanding of public perceptions of police integrity and provides a roadmap for strengthening legitimacy in law enforcement.
Keywords
Police Integrity, Public Perception, Procedural Justice
Downloads
References
1. Adorjan, M., Ricciardelli, R., & Spencer, D. C. (2017). Youth perceptions of police in rural Atlantic Canada. Police Practice and Research, 18(6), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1363961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahrum, C. (2022). Halo effects and public evaluation of police service. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2022.2066881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Boyd-Swan, C. H., & Molina, A. D. (2019). Public service integrity and the quality of governance: Examining the role of citizen–administrator value congruence. Public Integrity, 21(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1453912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braga, A. A., Winship, C., Tyler, T. R., Fagan, J., & Meares, T. L. (2014). The salience of social contextual factors in appraisals of police interactions with citizens: A randomized factorial experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(4), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9216-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Burgason, K. A. (2017). Trust is hard to come by: Disentangling the influence of structural characteristics and race on perceptions of trust in the police in a major Southern county. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 15(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2017.1385558 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chand, A., Karan, M. F., & Goundar, P. (2022). Public perceptions of police in Fiji. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 38(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862221096942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. De Angelis, J., & Wolf, B. (2016). Perceived accountability and public attitudes toward local police. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(3), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2016.1158177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605057727 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. He, M., Yang, A., Lu, J., & Shi, C. (2023). An experimental study on how accents affect public perceptions of the police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 17, paad047. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ivkovic, S. K., Maskály, J., & Haberfeld, M. M. (2025). The profiles of police integrity. In The Routledge handbook of anti-corruption research and practice (pp. 473–494). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303275-34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ivković, S. K. (2015). Studying police integrity. In Measuring police integrity across the world (pp. 1–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2279-6_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ivković, S. K., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2015). A comparative perspective on police integrity. In Measuring police integrity across the world (pp. 329–368). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2279-6_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kane, R. J. (2002). The social ecology of police misconduct. Criminology, 40(4), 867–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00976.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ko, E. (2020). Scandals and reforms: Combating police corruption in Taiwan. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2018-0114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lai, Y.-L., Haruta, Y., Sanai, S., Suzuki, A., & Shimada, T. (2024). Public confidence attitude formation toward the police in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: Similarities and differences. Asian Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-024-09426-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lai, Y.-L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of race/ethnicity, neighborhood context, and police/citizen interaction on residents’ attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Melkamu, M. T., & Teshome, W. (2023). Public trust in the police: Investigating the influence of police performance, procedural fairness, and police–community relations in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2199559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2199559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nalla, M. K., & Madan, M. (2012). Determinants of citizens’ perceptions of police–community cooperation in India: Implications for community policing. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-011-9110-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Pham, C., & Cheng, J. (2020). Perceptions of the police: The role of need for cognition and numeracy. Studia Psychologica, 62(4), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.31577/SP.2020.04.807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Prprović, B., Nemec, N., Kutnjak Ivković, S., Cajner Mraović, I., & Borovec, K. (2022). Inside and outside views of the Croatian police. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 46(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1866048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ramli, S. I., Kadir, N. A., & Karupiah, P. (2024). Police Integrity: a Thematic Review of Its Public Perception. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 9(37), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.937030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ruddell, R., & Trott, K. (2023). Perceptions of trust in the police: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 47(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2022.2071308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 777–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/827739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Semukhina, O., & Reynolds, K. M. (2014). Russian citizens’ perceptions of corruption and trust of the police. Policing and Society, 24(2), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Tankebe, J. (2008). Police effectiveness and police trustworthiness in Ghana: An empirical appraisal. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808088990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Tyler, T. R. (2021). Why people obey the law (New ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1j66769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Wells, W. (2007). Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police–citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Wentz, E. A., & Schlimgen, K. A. (2012). Citizens’ perceptions of police service and police response to community concerns. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2011.631412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Wuschke, K., Henning, K., & Stewart, G. (2022). Dots versus density: The impact of crime mapping techniques on perception of safety, police performance and neighbourhood quality. Policing and Society, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1874950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Wu, Y. (2010). College students’ evaluation of police performance: A comparison of Chinese and Americans. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Zairul, M. (2020). A thematic review on student-centred learning in the studio education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.95 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zernova, M. (2012). The public image of the contemporary Russian police: Impact of personal experiences of policing, wider social implications and the potential for change. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211229969 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]