Building and Applying the Health Thinking Scale among the Students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences

Authors

Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman AL-Ogaidi

Department of Educational and Psychological Sciences, College of Education for Humanities, University of Mosul (Iraq)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500136

Subject Category: Health Science

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 2028-2039

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-01

Accepted: 2026-05-06

Published: 2026-05-25

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to design, construct and apply the Health Thinking Scale among the students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences.
The sample consisted of (400) male and female students, selected by stratified random method with equal distribution, from all academic stages of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences, and in order to measure healthy thinking, a scale was built based on theoretical bridging (synthesis method), which consisted of (24) items.
The psychometric characteristics of the scale were extracted, including apparent truthfulness, which amounted to (98%), as well as the stability coefficient by the repeat method (0.80), while the statistical methods used were the Social Statistical Package (SPSS).
The results showed that the arithmetic average of the students' score was (69.93) with a standard deviation of (17.20) and when comparing the arithmetic average of the students' score with the hypothetical average of performance of (60) using the T-scale for one sample, it was found that the calculated T value is equal to (11.54) which is greater than the tabular T value (1.96) at the significance level of (0.05) and a degree of freedom (399). This indicates that there is a statistically significant difference, i.e., the students of the Faculties of Education for the Humanities and Pure Sciences possess healthy thinking.
We conclude from the research that the students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences have a positive outlook, intellectual flexibility, and self-awareness in managing the crises they face, and this is a clear proof of healthy thinking.

Keywords

NA

Downloads

References

1. AL-Ogaidi, Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman (2025) Building and Applying the Reckless Thinking Scale among Students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences. International journal of research and innovation in social science (IJRISS), Volume/Issue:9\12, Page No: 164-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AL-Ogaidi, Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman (2025) Twisted thinking and its relationship to radical thinking among university students. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol 51, a2245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. AL-Ogaidi, Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman (2026) Building and Applying the Repetitive Thinking Scale among Students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences. International journal of research and innovation in social science (IJRISS), Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 6529-6538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. AL-Ogaidi, Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman (2026) Measuring Twisted Thinking among Young University Students. International journal of research and innovation in social science (IJRISS), Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3979-3987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brough, Paula (2019) Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology Design, Analysis and Reporting. First published by Routledge, 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown, A. (2018). The role of meta-awareness in the Healthy Minds Framework: Insights from fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 50–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brown, L. M. (2018). Metacognition and emotional regulation in higher education. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Center for Healthy Minds. (2020). Enhancing neural plasticity through mindfulness: A report on academic adaptability (Report No. 2020-15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dahl, C. J., Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2020). The framework of healthy minds: Training purpose and neural correlates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(4), 10–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Duhigg, C. (2012). The power of habit: Why we do what we do in life and business. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dunn, Dana S. (2013) Research Methods for Social psychology. Second Edition, Textbook, ISBN 978-1-118-40605-2, Printed in the United States of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House Publishing Group. Journal Psychology, Vol.7 No.9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eid, Jarle, Anita Lill Hansen, Natalia Andreassen, Roar Espevik, Guttorm Brattebø and Bjørn Helge Johnsen (2023) Developing local crisis leadership – A research and training agenda. Sec. Health Psycholog, Volume 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ferguson, Connor L. & Julie A. Lockman (2024) Increasing PhD student self-awareness and self-confidence through strengths-based professional development. published by Julie A. Lockman, Volume 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Filice, Lucas & W. James Weese (2024) Developing Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Encyclopedia, Vol. 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garcia, R. T. (2023). Holistic approaches to student mental health. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Habib, Safaa Tarek and Sadiq Abdel Nour Aziz (2018) Building Psychological Scales According to the Paragraph Response Theory Using the Generalized Scouting Model. First Edition, Dar Al-Manhayah for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, Jordan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Howitt, Dennis and Duncan Cramer (2014) Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology. Fourth Edition, printed by Ashford Colour Press Ltd., Gosport, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow CM20 2JE, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hurson, T. (2008). Think better: An innovator’s guide to productive thinking. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Javidi, Nasir, Mostafa Ghanei, Khodabakhsh Ahmadi, Mohammad Javad, Ahmadizadeh & Abbas Ebadi (2022) Indicators of Intellectual Thinking as Healthy Thinking and Its Relation with Health-Promoting Lifestyle: A New Perspective in Clinical Psychology and Public Health. Iran J Public Health, Vol. 51, No.6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Joshanloo, M. (2019). Purposeful thinking, cortisol levels, and academic perseverance: Empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2022). Crisis resilience in educational settings. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. MacBride, Dawn M. (2018) the Process of Statistical Analysis in Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard 55, City Road London, EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Markus, Keith A and Denny Borsboom (2013) Frontiers of Test Validity Theory Measurement, Causation, and Meaning. Published by Routledge, 711 Third Avenue, NY 10017, New York, United States of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Privitera, Gregory J. (2019) Essential Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd, one Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London, EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rabie, Mashaan Hadi and Khatam Ismail Ahmed (2008) Measurement and Evaluation in Education. Dar Zahran, Amman, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press, Vol. 3 No. 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smith, J. A. (2021). Foundations of healthy thinking: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Suud, Fitriah M. & Tri Na’imah (2023) The effect of positive thinking training on academic stress of Muslim students in thesis writing: a quasi-experimental study. international journal of adolescence and youth, vol. 28, No. 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Thompson, R., Davis, K., & Miller, F. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and learning in the digital age. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Verma J. P. (2019) Statistics and Research Methods in Psychology with Excel. Published by the registered company Springer Ltd, the registered company, 152 Beach Road, Gateway East, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Waugh, E. Waugh & Anthony W. Sali (2023) Resilience as the Ability to Maintain Well-Being: An Allostatic Active Inference Mode. Journal of Intelligence, Vol. 11, No. 158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wong, P. T. P. (2011). The human quest for meaning: A handbook of strategies. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles