Building State Capacity Post-Endemic: Lessons from Ibn Khaldun

The global transition from pandemic to endemic phases highlights the critical need for enhanced state capacity and resilience, revealing gaps in governance and social cohesion. This article investigates how Ibn Khaldun’s theories can inform contemporary strategies for strengthening state capacity in post-endemic contexts. It aims to bridge classical Khaldunian thought with current public sector management and governance debates by identifying principles that support institutional resilience, inclusive development and social cohesion. Using a qualitative interpretivist design, the study conducts conceptual and thematic analyses of Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddimah, supported by contemporary scholarly interpretations and literature on state capacity, pandemic governance, public administration and resilience. The analysis identifies four interrelated themes: robust governance structures, social cohesion (asabiyyah), equitable resource allocation and institutional adaptability. The conceptual findings suggest that these elements operate as mutually reinforcing pillars of sustainable state capacity. Strong governance provides institutional order and accountability; social cohesion strengthens trust and collective compliance; distributive justice improves legitimacy; and adaptability enables public institutions to respond to changing risks. The discussion argues that trust-building between government institutions and communities is central to strengthening resilience beyond technical administrative reform. The article concludes that integrating Khaldunian insights into contemporary governance strategies can enrich public sector management by linking institutional effectiveness with moral, social and distributive dimensions of state-building. Practical implications include policy recommendations for governments to prioritise ethical leadership, transparent resource distribution, community engagement and adaptive policy learning in post-endemic recovery. The study contributes to theoretical and practical discourse on governance, state capacity and resilience management, while demonstrating the continuing relevance of classical Muslim social thought for addressing modern public administration challenges.

State Capacity; Ibn Khaldun; Public Sector Management; Social Cohesion (Asabiyyah); Resilience Management

1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. Penguin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alatas, S. F. (2019). Applying Ibn Khaldun: The Recovery of a Lost Tradition in Sociology. Current Sociology, 67(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119830827 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bouckaert, G., Galli, D., & Kuhlmann, S. (2020). Public Administration and Crisis Management: Pandemic Governance in Europe. Public Policy and Administration, 35(4), 384–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2022). Making Sense of Governance During COVID-19: Design, Capacity, and Legitimacy. Policy and Society, 41(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chapra, M. U. (2008). Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of Social Solidarity and its Implications for Modern Muslim Societies. The Muslim World, 98(2–3), 273–292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Farazmand, A. (2021). Governance and Public Administration in the Middle East and North Africa. Public Organization Review, 21(3), 495–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What Is Governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fukuyama, F. (2020). Social Trust and Public Health Policy. Journal of International Affairs, 73(2), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Greer, S. L., King, E. J., Massard da Fonseca, E., & Peralta-Santos, A. (2022). The Comparative Politics of COVID-19: The Need to Understand Government Responses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., ... & Webster, S. (2021). A Global Panel Database of Pandemic Policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khaldun, I. (1377/2005). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Khan, M. (2022). Bureaucratic Stability and Crisis Performance: Lessons from the COVID-19 Response. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 460–475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Social Trust and Policy Compliance in Times of Crisis: Evidence from COVID-19. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 833–846. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kira, B., & Angrist, N. (2022). Pandemic Governance and Policy Responses: Lessons from Global Comparisons. Global Policy, 13(2), 290–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mahdi, M. (2006). Ibn Khaldun. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 818–823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Bank. (2023). Indonesia Economic Prospects: Financial Deepening for Stronger Growth and Sustainable Recovery. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zaman, M. Q. (2019). Rethinking Ibn Khaldun: The Social Sciences, Epistemology, and Islamic Thought. Islamic Studies, 58(4), 431–45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria