Capability, Academic, and E-Leadership Skills in Higher Education Institution as Drivers of Faculty Job Satisfaction
Authors
La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)
La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800054
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 723-735
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-11
Accepted: 2026-08-16
Published: 2026-08-25
Abstract
This study determined the institutional capability, academic leadership, and e-leadership of a local higher education institution in relation to faculty job satisfaction. Employing a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design, the study gathered data from full-time permanent and contractual faculty members using validated survey instruments. Descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to analyze the data. Findings revealed that the institution demonstrated very high levels of institutional capability, academic leadership, and e-leadership, while faculty job satisfaction was generally high. Furthermore, institutional capability, academic leadership, and e-leadership each exhibited significant positive relationships with faculty job satisfaction, indicating that effective organizational systems, competent academic leadership, and strategic digital leadership contribute to a more supportive and satisfying work environment for faculty members. The study concludes that strengthening institutional capability and leadership competencies can enhance faculty well-being, organizational effectiveness, and institutional performance. The findings provide an empirical basis for leadership development initiatives, organizational improvement strategies, and evidence-informed policy formulation in higher education institutions.
Keywords
Education
Downloads
References
1. Apdian, V., & Prado, N. (2024). Transformational leadership, cultural intelligence, self-efficacy, and productivity among higher education faculty: A structural model. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 55(1), 203–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Benevene, P., De Stasio, S., Fiorilli, C., Buonomo, I., Ragni, B., Briegas, J. J. M., & Barni, D. (2022). Effect of teachers' happiness on teachers' health. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 849335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Jr., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., ... Paskevicius, M. (2021). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bush, T. (2021). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Commission on Higher Education. (2023). Higher education statistical bulletin. https://ched.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2021). COVID-19: Twenty countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Franco, J. (2023). The relationship between servant leadership and employees' job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Basis for a proposed model for higher educational institutions. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Fullan, M. (2023). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hazelkorn, E., & Gibson, A. (2022). Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kasalak, G., Güneri, B., Ehtiyar, V. R., Apaydin, Ç., & Türker, G. Ö. (2022). The relation between leadership styles in higher education institutions and academic staff's job satisfaction: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1038824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038824 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kinman, G. (2022). Supporting the well-being of higher education employees: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lucero, H. R., Victoriano, J. M., Carpio, J. T., & Fernando, P. G., Jr. (2022). Assessment of e-learning readiness of faculty members and students in the government and private higher education institutions in the Philippines. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Maheshwari, G., Clarke, S., Nguyen, Q.-A. N., McClelland, R., & Kunte, M. (2024). Effect of e-leadership on employees' outcomes in the higher education sector during COVID-19 and beyond: A case study from Vietnam. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231222715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nguyen, T. D., Pham, H. H., & Tran, T. (2023). Academic leadership and faculty job satisfaction in higher education: The mediating role of organizational support. Education Sciences, 13(9), 901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. OECD. (2022). Education at a glance 2022: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b14bef59-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2022). Research methods for education (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Salmi, J. (2021). Tertiary education and the sustainable development goals. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction, stress, and professional engagement: A review of recent research. Educational Research Review, 33, 100389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Smith, A., & Egitim, S. (2024). Governance of higher education institutions through faculty perspectives. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(2), 39–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Sunaengsih, C., Maulana, M., Djuanda, D., Rosalin, E., Thahir, M., & Nurafifah, T. S. (2024). E-leadership in effective higher education management. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 11(4), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i4.79400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. UNESCO. (2022). Transforming higher education for the future. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Vannasuk, N. (2024). Needs assessment of participatory school management for educational quality development of small primary schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED648489). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. World Bank. (2022). Achieving quality education through efficient public spending. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study