Caught between Dismay and Hope: The Status of Youth Today and Its Role in the Political Future in Afghanistan

Youth is a pivotal force in shaping a nation’s political future. The better they are educated and equipped with skills the better they would contribute to the development of the country, politically as well as socio-economically. In today's Afghanistan, however, the young generation face significant obstacles that hinder their ability to participate in the progress of their community and demonstrate a potential role in the country’s political future. Many young people attempt to immigrate abroad, for education, for work, and for better life. The youth staying in Afghanistan hope to influence change by pursuing education in fields such as political science and economics, aiming not only to secure employment and support their families but also to contribute to shaping policies that promote socio-economic development in their communities.

Afghan Youth, Political Participation, Barriers, Empowerment

1. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barfield, T. (2010). Afghanistan: A cultural and political history. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barfield, T. (2022). Bringing more effective governance to Afghanistan: 10 pathways to stability. Journal of Asian Studies, 81(4), 1001–1023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Belschner, J. (2021). Hierarchies of representation: The re distributive effects of gender and youth quotas. Representation, 57(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bieber, F. (2022). Youth quotas and inclusive governance in post revolutionary Tunisia. Journal of North African Studies, 27(4), 789–810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blattman, C., & Annan, J. (2016). Can employment reduce lawlessness and rebellion? A field experiment with high risk men in a fragile state. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Conciliation Resources. (2018). Institutionalizing inclusive and sustainable justice in Afghanistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. EU Council of Europe youth partnership. (2020). Meaningful youth political participation in Europe: Concepts, patterns and policy implications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hakimi, A., & Bose, S. (2019). The pitfalls of protection: Gender, violence, and power in Afghanistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (CIRCLE Working Paper 59). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kapur, D. (2010). Diaspora, development, and democracy: The domestic impact of international migration from India. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. King, E. (2013). Educating for conflict or peace: Challenges and dilemmas in post conflict Rwanda. International Journal, 60(4), 607–626. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Majidi, N. (2024). Return to Afghanistan: Re migration and the failed reintegration of millions of Afghans. Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Majidi, N., James, K., & Nighoskar, D. (2024, December 10). Return to Afghanistan: Re migration and the failed reintegration of millions of Afghans. Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Monsutti, A. (2006). Afghan transnational networks: Looking beyond repatriation. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rubin, B. R. (2013). Afghanistan: How we lost the war. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ryan, K. (2007). Digital communication tools and Afghan youth: Leveraging technology for empowerment. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(3), 295–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schetter, C. (2013). Jirga, shura and community development councils: Village institutions and state interference. In C. Schetter (Ed.), Local politics in Afghanistan: A century of intervention in the social order (pp. 39–58). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Strand, A., & Suhrke, A. (2021). Quiet engagement with the Taliban. Survival, 63(5), 35–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Suhrke, A. (2021). The dynamics of youth activism in Afghanistan: A journey between hope and desperation. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. The Asia Foundation. (2018). Afghanistan in 2018: A survey of the Afghan people. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2019). World youth report: Addressing the complex challenges facing young people today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2022). Promoting youth participation in decision making and public service delivery through harnessing digital technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2017). Afghanistan human development report 2017: Improving human development indicators. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2021). Afghanistan human development report 2021: Youth and the future of Afghanistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Afghanistan: Socio economic outlook 2021–2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). UNDP report paints grim picture of Afghanistan a year after transition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2024, August 12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNICEF, & UNESCO. (2025). Afghanistan education situation report 2025. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNAMA. (2024). De facto authorities’ moral oversight in Afghanistan: Impacts on human rights. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UN Women. (2024). Afghanistan gender country profile 2024. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. World Bank. (2020). Afghanistan: Systematic country diagnostic – Priorities for ending poverty and boosting shared prosperity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank. (2020). Change makers: Empowering youth for inclusive societies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank. (2023). Afghanistan development update: October 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions