Challenges and Institutional Support in Implementing Positive Reinforcement in Malaysian Primary Schools: Teachers' Perspectives and Recommendations

Although positive reinforcement is widely endorsed as an effective classroom management strategy, its consistent implementation in real classrooms is often constrained by practical and institutional conditions. This study explored the challenges Malaysian primary school teachers face when using positive reinforcement and the forms of institutional support they consider necessary for its effective implementation, with a view to proposing recommendations for practice. A qualitative, phenomenological design was employed, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with five primary school teachers from five states in Peninsular Malaysia, selected through purposive sampling; the data were analysed thematically. The findings revealed four interrelated challenges: large class sizes that prevent individualised attention, time constraints that hinder immediate and consistent reinforcement, heavy workloads that reduce teachers' capacity to focus on students, and student over-dependence on tangible rewards that risks undermining intrinsic motivation. Teachers further emphasised that institutional support is essential, calling for structured professional training and workshops, adequate resources and materials, reduced workloads, smaller class sizes, and stronger administrative backing. These findings indicate that the gap between reinforcement theory and classroom practice is largely systemic rather than attitudinal: teachers are willing to apply positive reinforcement, but contextual and institutional constraints limit its use. The study recommends that schools and policymakers institute regular professional development on reinforcement strategies, provide practical reinforcement materials, review teacher workloads and class sizes, and develop school-level guidelines that balance extrinsic rewards with the cultivation of intrinsic motivation. The paper contributes contextual, classroom-grounded evidence to the literature on behavioural classroom management and offers actionable guidance for improving the conditions under which positive reinforcement is implemented in Malaysian primary education.

Positive reinforcement, implementation challenges, institutional support, teacher workload, Malaysian primary schools

1. Abdulrazak, S., Mohammed Bello, H., & Abubakar, S. (2025). Effect of positive reinforcement on addressing school avoidance and enhancing academic motivation among junior secondary school students in low-income communities in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education Effectiveness Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adamova, K. (2025). Creation and validation of the interview guide: A qualitative part of the validation of the Basic English Examination Project. Bulletin of L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Philology Series, 150(1), 283–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeniran, A. O., & Tayo-Ladega, O. (2024). Critical analysis of phenomenological research design in a qualitative research method. Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.22105/ad338t15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmar, D. S., & Azzajjad, M. F. (2025). Empowering local wisdom for enhancing students' social skills in the global era. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v2i2.120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 5, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ani, S. C., Zake, N. A. M., Akbar, N. A. A., Ramzi, N. A. N., & Zamziba, N. A. M. (2025). Teaching on the edge: How workload drives burnout among Malaysian educators. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(5), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i5/25130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Awang, M. M., Hashim, A. T. M., Hua, T. K., Ahmad, A. R., & Mamat, N. (2022). Observations of strategies used by secondary school teachers in physical classrooms to promote positive behaviour. Sustainability, 14(12), 7013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Azhar, M. (2024). Self-control strategies for handling student's disruptive behavior in the classroom at secondary level. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Education, 2(2), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080522X16454629995872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bonghawan, R. G. G., & Macalisang, D. (2024). Teachers' learning reinforcement: Effects on students' motivation, self-efficacy and academic performance. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(02), 3218–3228. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.el08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bowen, J. A., & Watson, C. E. (2025). Teaching with AI: A practical guide to a new era of human learning. JHU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Coleman, H. (2018). An almost invisible 'difficult circumstance': The large class. In Multilingualisms and development (pp. 29–48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53104-9_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fahad Mon, B., Wasfi, A., Hayajneh, M., Slim, A., & Abu Ali, N. (2023). Reinforcement learning in education: A literature review. Informatics, 10(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fernando, L., Irawan, D., & Sitompul, K. L. F. (2025). Theoretical review of behavioristic approaches in education: The role of reward and punishment in increasing learning motivation. Contemporary Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v3i3.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Positive reinforcement: An approach to enhancing accountability and drive among students. International Journal of Applied Educational Research, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaer.v1i1.442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hasanah, M., Arafat, Y., Barni, M., Raya, A. T., & Aprilianto, A. (2024). Teachers' strategies for managing disruptive behavior in the classroom during the learning process. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hambali, N., Muhamad, S. H. A., Noh, N., Alias, A. F. N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Exploring the influence of existence, relatedness and growth on learner's motivation. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 7(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15804199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Horn, A. L., Floyd, K. K., Douglas, K. H., Karadimou, O., Bobzien, J. L., & Layden, S. J. (2024). What do rural special education teachers say? Examining the reported needs and recommendations for retention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241254863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hussin, H. M., Shaffeei, K., Bukhari, N. I. A., & Samsudin, N. A. (2025). Teaching practices of excellent special education teachers in Malaysia: A conceptual review. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hyseni Duraku, Z., Blakaj, V., Shllaku Likaj, E., Boci, L., & Shtylla, H. (2022). Professional training improves early education teachers' knowledge, skills, motivation, and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 7, 980254. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.980254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Impuesto, R. (2024). Influence of teachers' work conditions on classroom management practices. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(12), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Johler, M., Krumsvik, R. J., Bugge, H. E., & Helgevold, N. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of their role and classroom management practices in a technology rich primary school classroom. Frontiers in Education, 7, 841385. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.841385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Karatsareas, P. (2022). Semi-structured interviews. In Research methods in language attitudes (p. 99). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Khanum, B., Sardar, R., & Bajwa, T. H. (2025). Role of positive reinforcement strategies in students learning performance at elementary level. ASSAJ, 4(01), 2218–2235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kim, M., Albers, N. D., & Knotts, T. L. (2023). Academic success through engagement and trust fostered by professor leadership style. Education Sciences, 13(6), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lagawid, E. L. (2024). Overloading in elementary school teachers: A review. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(11), 289–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, Skinner, and operant conditioning: Considerations for sport coaching practice. Strategies, 35(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lim Kok Seng, E. (2024). Investigating teachers' views of student-centred learning approach. https://doi.org/10.60692/1f683-kq689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mamaile, D., & Omodan, B. I. (2023). Exploring challenges hindering teachers' implementation of classroom management strategies in Gauteng high schools, South Africa. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2023.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mat, N. C., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). Effectiveness of practices and applications of student-centered teaching and learning in primary schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 1025–1044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Md Shah, S., Noranee, S., Munir, Z. A., Noranee, S., Shahruddin, S., & Mujanah, S. (2024). The influence of work-life balance, workload and work environment on burnout among teachers in Melaka Tengah District, Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 16(1), 137–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mondol, M., Rahul, M. M., & Hasan, M. J. (2026). Perceived role of positive reinforcement on primary students' academic engagement and motivation. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 52(3), 117–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231205789. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Namdar, A. O., & Altun, E. (2025). What do future primary school teachers know about conscious consumption and how do they behave? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 17(3), 417–431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Obee, A. F., Hart, K. C., & Fabiano, G. A. (2023). Professional development targeting classroom management and behavioral support skills in early childhood settings: A systematic review. School Mental Health, 15(2), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09562-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Obilor, E. I. (2023). Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same? International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 11(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Pan, R., Wang, Q., Cao, J., & Zhou, C. (2024). Deep reinforcement learning for solving steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problems under time-of-use tariffs. International Journal of Production Research, 62(1–2), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2267693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Polat, A. (2025). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: Common pitfalls and practical insights for academic writing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251372835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Raof, M. Z., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2025). The usage of positive reinforcement to study its effect on learners' motivation during online class. Practitioner Research, 7(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2025.7.1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Rifin, R., Sidik, N. B., Abdul Rahman, N. H., Mohd Hussain, M., & Mokhtar, S. M. A. (2025). The influence of self-regulated strategies on components in motivational beliefs. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 7(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15804446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Robinson, L. E., Clements, G., Drescher, A., El Sheikh, A., Milarsky, T. K., Hanebutt, R., & Rose, C. A. (2023). Developing a multi-tiered system of support-based plan for bullying prevention among students with disabilities: Perspectives from general and special education teachers during professional development. School Mental Health, 15(3), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-023-09589-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Robinson, O., & Wilson, A. (2022). Transcribing and coding. In Practicing and presenting social research. BCcampus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sheikh, A. B. M., & Nor, M. N. M. (2023). Constraints and innovative teaching skills practice among state government secondary school teachers. Journal of Psychology English, (230), 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7573735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Stasolla, F., Zullo, A., Maniglio, R., Passaro, A., Di Gioia, M., Curcio, E., & Martini, E. (2025). Deep learning and reinforcement learning for assessing and enhancing academic performance in university students: A scoping review. AI, 6(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6020040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2025). Purposive sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Taylor, R., Fakhimi, M., Ioannou, A., & Spanaki, K. (2025). Personalized learning in education: A machine learning and simulation approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(7), 2662–2689. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2023-0380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Zahid, L., & Cheema, A. U. (2023). An investigation of the impact of positive and negative reinforcement in motivating student's learning. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 913–923. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study