Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of the Revised K to 10 Curriculum Among Key Stage 1 Teachers: Implications For Intervention Program

Authors

Marifel C. Alvarez

Holy Infant College of Tacloban City, Inc., Tacloban City (Philippines)

Lilia P.Adrales

Holy Infant College of Tacloban City, Inc., Tacloban City (Philippines)

Virginia S. Ariza

Leyte, Philippines 2Eastern Visayas State University Carigara Campus (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800754

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 11104-11123

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-02

Accepted: 2026-09-07

Published: 2026-09-17

Abstract

This study assessed the implementation of the Revised K to 10 Curriculum and the challenges and opportunities experienced by Key Stage 1 (KS1) teachers. It also examined the relationships among curriculum implementation, challenges, and opportunities, and determined whether teachers’ perceptions differed by profile. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, the study surveyed 165 KS1 teachers through a structured questionnaire. The study analyzed data using frequency, percentage, mean, Pearson correlation, independent-samples t-test, and one-way analysis of variance. The findings showed that the curriculum was implemented to a great extent, with assessment and evaluation and instructional delivery receiving the highest ratings. The most pronounced challenges involved teacher workload, learner-related concerns, and inadequate resources. Nevertheless, teachers identified considerable opportunities to improve learner engagement, professional collaboration, and professional growth. Significant relationships were found between curriculum implementation and both perceived challenges and opportunities. Perceived challenges did not differ significantly across the respondents’ profile variables. However, perceived opportunities differed significantly according to years of teaching experience and level of relevant training attended. Based on these findings, the study proposed a structured intervention program to strengthen curriculum implementation through enhanced professional development, improved resource support, and sustained instructional supervision.

Keywords

challenges, curriculum implementation, Key Stage 1 teachers, opportunities, Revised K to 10 Curriculum

Downloads

References

1. Baterna, C. E. (2024). Development of learning resources: Stance of elementary teachers. International Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(6), 1–7. https://journal.ijris.com/index.php/ijris/article/view/51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Batonghinog, P. J. A., & Chavez, J. C. (2025). Professional development training and academic support: Predictors of teachers’ confidence in curriculum change. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(7), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Christensen, A. A., & Jerrim, J. (2025). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes: A cross-national analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 156, Article 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Demate, D. R. B., Aclis, M. S., Catbagan, F. C. P., Molina, G. G., Ramos, N. U., & Patacsil, F. F. (2025). Teacher perspectives on MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and collaborative solutions. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(11), Article e2025351. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education. (2012, April 17). DO 31, s. 2012—Policy guidelines on the implementation of Grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum effective School Year 2012–2013. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2012/04/17/do-31-s-2012-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-grades-1-to-10-of-the-k-to-12-basic-education-curriculum-bec-effective-school-year-2012-2013/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2016, June 7). DO 35, s. 2016—The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2016/06/07/do-35-s-2016-the-learning-action-cell-as-a-k-to-12-basic-education-program-school-based-continuing-professional-development-strategy-for-the-improvement-of-teaching-and-learning/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2023, January 30). MATATAG: DepEd’s new agenda to resolve basic education woes. https://bukidnon.deped.gov.ph/2023/01/30/matatag-depeds-new-agenda-to-resolve-basic-education-woes/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education. (2024a, January 24). DepEd, World Bank unveil teacher development project in Mindanao. https://depedcalabarzon.ph/?p=5856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2024b, July 23). DO 010, s. 2024—Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/07/23/july-23-2024-do-010-s-2024-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-matatag-curriculum/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2024c). MATATAG curriculum: Curriculum guides for Kindergarten and Grades 1, 4, and 7. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatagcurriculumk147/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation (OECD Education Working Papers No. 239). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/efe8a48c-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grape, J. C. (2024). Learning Action Cell in professional development: Teachers’ perspective. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), Article 21439. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.21439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malinao, A. J. N., & Miano, J. J. S. (2025). Implementing the MATATAG Curriculum: A qualitative study on teachers’ challenges, adaptation strategies, and support needs. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Montero, R. P., & Ducot, L. A. (2025). Exploring the challenges in implementing the MATATAG Curriculum. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(10), 1410–1424. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.461010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ndayisenga, J. d’Amour. (2025). The impact of competency-based curriculum in enhancing learning outcomes: A study of Rwandan secondary schools. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Curriculum flexibility and autonomy: Promoting a thriving learning environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eccbbac2-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Teacher professional learning: Drawing upon international practice for a future vision for Ukraine. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0cceeddf-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Prado, L. L., & Asparin, A. A. (2025). Teachers’ perception and challenges in implementing MATATAG Curriculum. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 44(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.440209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Prudente, M. S., Garcia, J. A. S., Mistades, V. M., Roleda, L. S., & Talaue, F. T. (2024). Systematic review of professional development programs for teachers in the Philippines (Research Paper Series No. 003). Second Congressional Commission on Education and De La Salle University. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/18_Prudente-et-al-Systematic-Review-of-Professional-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Torrefiel, J. C., Cagape, E. S., Galan, O. V., Doydora, V. P., & Pintac, T. D. (2025). Teachers’ lived experiences in the transition to the MATATAG Curriculum: A phenomenological inquiry into adaptation, challenges, and growth. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(4), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023, November 9). Gender equality in and through the teaching profession. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/gender-equality-and-through-teaching-profession [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2021). We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Bank. (2024). Philippines—Teacher Effectiveness and Competencies Enhancement Project: Second implementation support mission, September 23–October 11, 2024. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099102824192510741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Bank, & United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2022). Philippines—Learning poverty brief. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099000207152223103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yunting, J. D. C., Santos, M. C. R., Ampong, A. H. C., Jr., Mejos, D. P., & Monreal, J. A. (2025). Evaluating teachers’ perceptions on the first year of MATATAG Curriculum implementation among selected schools: A quantitative analysis. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.47139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zerna, C. A. (2025). Teachers’ point of views on the implementation of DO No. 5, s. 2024: Basis for policy review (Rationalization of teachers’ workload in public schools and payment of teaching overload). Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 41(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.410604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles