Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, and Language Learning Strategies of High-Achieving Students

High-achieving students are often seen as independent and able to manage academic demands on their own. However, studies show that they also experience challenges that are not always recognized in schools. This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of high-achieving students, focusing on their challenges, coping mechanisms, and language learning strategies. The study aimed to develop an integrative model based on these experiences.
The study was guided by three theories: Lazarus and Folkman’s Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping, Zimmerman’s Self-Regulated Learning Theory, and Oxford’s Language Learning Strategy Theory. These theories helped explain how students deal with academic pressure, perfectionism, and differences in teaching methods. Findings revealed that high-achieving students experience stress, anxiety, and burnout due to high expectations and limited support. Despite these challenges, they use various coping mechanisms. These include problem-focused strategies such as managing time and setting goals, as well as emotion-focused strategies like practicing self-control, staying positive, and seeking support from others.
In terms of language learning, participants reported using metacognitive, cognitive, social, and affective strategies. They also make use of digital tools and independent learning practices to improve their skills.
Based on the findings, a conceptual model was developed to show the relationship between the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they use, and their language learning strategies. The study, conducted in the Philippine context, provides a better understanding of high-achieving students and offers insights that may help improve teaching practices and student support.

High-achieving students; lived experiences; coping mechanisms; language learning strategies; qualitative research

1. Abdullah, M. (2022). Language learning strategies of Kurdish EFL learners: A comparison between high-achieving and low-achieving students. International Journal of Language Education, 6(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agayon, A. J. D., Agayon, A. K. R., & Pentang, J. (2022). Teachers in the new normal: Challenges and coping mechanisms in secondary schools. PhilPapers. https://philpapers.org/rec/AGATIT-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological qualitative methods applied to the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel educational social contexts. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almousa, N. A., Al-Shobaki, N., Arabiyat, R., Al-Shatrat, W., Al-Shogran, R., & Sulaiman, B. A. (2022). Academic Problems Facing High Achieving Students at Universities. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(4), 12-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arvidsson, K., & Engel, H. (2024). How do high-achieving students learn languages online?. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 154-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Babicka-Wirkus, A., Wirkus, L., Stasiak, K., & Kozłowski, P. (2021). University students' strategies of coping with stress during the coronavirus pandemic: Data from Poland. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0251792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students' online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7323–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10582-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cahyo, N. H. S. D., Rachmajanti, S., & Muniroh, S. (2024). Language learning strategies of the high achievers of TOEFL junior test in an Indonesian Islamic boarding school: A case study. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(3), 1119-1130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, J., Zhang, L. J., & Chen, X. (2026). L2 learners’ self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy for writing achievement: A latent profile analysis. Language Teaching Research, 30(1), 14-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Choi, Y., Hyun, S. H., & Lee, S. (2025). The (mis)understood image of the Korean students: How do high achieving college students navigate their college experiences? Asia Pacific Education Review, 26, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Coles, R. M. (2023). Strengths and struggles among high academic achievers in senior high school: A Philippine setting. Surigao State College of Technology – Del Carmen Campus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cuerdo, M. P. (2021). Self-efficacy and academic achievement of high school students in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dang, B. Y.-Y., Ho, E., & Tsang, A. (2023). Learners’ assessment preferences in higher education: A comparison study of high achievers and low achievers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00679-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Demirkaya, A. S., Gedik, Ö. Ö., & Gürlen, E. (2021). High-achieving adults’ opinions on their educational lives and suggestions about educating gifted students. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 54(3), 863-890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. d'Anjou, B. (2025). How Do You See Yourself as a Learner? Exploring High-Achieving Middle School Girls’ Relationships to Themselves as Learners (Doctoral dissertation, New York University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. De Prada, E., Mareque, M., & Pino Juste, M. (2022). Teamwork skills in higher education: Is university training contributing to their mastery? https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00207-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Egan, H., O’Hara, M., Cook, A., & others. (2022). Mindfulness, self-compassion, resiliency and wellbeing in higher education: A recipe to increase academic performance. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(7), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Escoto, D. G., & Alfarero, J. A. (2022). Winning it both: Stories of secondary academic achiever student athletes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fennell, K. A. (2024). Examining intersections of gender, race, racism and college choice for high-achieving African American female students aspiring careers in STEM [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Peter's University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Flint, A., Gaunt, J., & O’Hara, M. (2022). Supporting high-achieving students after enrolment: Learning from a qualitative evaluation of a high achievers recognition scheme. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Fogaca, J. L. (2021). Combining mental health and performance interventions: Coping and social support for student-athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 33(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2019.1648326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fonseca, C. (2021). Emotional intensity in gifted students: Helping kids cope with explosive feelings. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fu, J., Sun, M., & Wang, M. (2022). Simulation-assisted learning about a complex economic system: Impact on low-and high-achieving students. Sustainability, 14(10), 6036. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Garcia, P., & Chen, S. (2022). Peer interactions and academic resilience: The social dimensions of learning. Journal of Academic Studies, 39(4), 123–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Guo, G. Q., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). The impact of co curricular activities on youth development: A self determination theory perspective. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00249-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Halali, A. A. S., Ismail, L., Abd Samad, A., Razali, A. B., & Noordin, N. (2023). The effect of communication language anxiety and prior learning experience on speaking challenges and strategies: The case of Libyan students in Malaysian higher education institutions. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v13i3.4745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hasrul, M. (2023). Language learning strategies used by high-achieving and low-achieving students in a private school. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(2), 210–220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Helsper, A., DeShon, L., Boylan, L. E., & Galliher, J. (2025). Under Pressure: Gifted Students' Vulnerabilities, Stressors, and Coping Mechanisms Within a High Achieving High School. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 114. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/2/114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jadia, E. G., Rayton, M. P. C., & Limos-Galay, J. A. (2023). Coping strategies and academic performance of working high school students in San Jose West District. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 11(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2023.1017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jiang, Q., Horta, H., & Yuen, M. (2024). High-and low-achieving international medical students’ perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities. Medical Education Online, 29(1), 2300194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Jones, L., & Castellanos, J. (2023). The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators and students in higher education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kaya, F., & Islekeller-Bozca, A. (2022). Experiences of gifted students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221102927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kaya, O. S., & Ercag, E. (2023). The impact of applying challenge-based gamification program on students’ learning outcomes: Academic achievement, motivation and flow. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10053-10078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Khatoon, A., Dahri, K. H., Samson, A., & Iqbal, S. (2022). Exploring The Challenges Of Academic Performance: A Case Study Of High Achievers. Webology, 19(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Khatoon, A., Khan, R., & Ali, S. (2022). Discipline and educational strategies in high-achieving students: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kim, Y., & Park, H. (2023). Technological integration in higher education and its effects on student stress and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Innovation, 12(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kumar, T., Kumar Roy, V., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Adopting learning strategies for English language acquisition on secondary level students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Le, T. H., & Pham, T. (2025). Navigating transitions: Vietnamese students’ experiences and challenges in the first year of higher education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2026). Application of large language models in engineering education: A case study of system modeling and simulation courses. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 54(1), 18-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bovill, C. (2023). Do students experience transformation through co creating curriculum in higher education? https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Malini, N. (2022). Language learning strategies used by high-achieving students in speaking skills. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(2), 215–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Malini, N. (2022). Language learning strategies used by learners in learning speaking. Magister Scientiae, 50(2), 97-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Maurya, R. K. (2024). A qualitative content analysis of ChatGPT's client simulation role‐play for practising counselling skills. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 614-630. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Micabalo, A. A., Poliquest, R. B., Ibanez, B. A., Comar, A. G., & Revillas, R. L. (2022). Research culture of the faculty and students: Its effect on academic performance. Journal of Educational Policy and Development, 10(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Miller, A. L. (2021). Achievement goal orientation as a predictor of high impact practice participation for postsecondary students. MWERA. Retrieved from https://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v34/issue3/MWER-V34n3-Miller-DISTINGUISHED-PAPER.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Mortari, L., Valbusa, F., Ubbiali, M., & Bombieri, R. (2023). The empirical phenomenological method: Theoretical foundation and research applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Mulugeta, A., & Pandian, A. V. R. (2022). Effect of time management practices on academic achievement of students in higher educational institutions of Ethiopia: The case of Dire Dawa University. The British Journal of Administrative Management, 58(148), 120–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Nguyen, T. (2023). Institutional support and academic well-being: A qualitative exploration of mentorship programs. Journal of Educational Support Services, 8(1), 55–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Nordmo, I., & Samara, A. (2009). The study experiences of the high achievers in a competitive academic environment: A cost of success? https://hdl.handle.net/1956/7754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. O’Connor, L., & Patel, R. (2021). Mentorship in higher education: Bridging academic excellence and professional development. Journal of Higher Education Mentorship, 15(3), 67–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Pasco, M. C., Hetrick, S., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on academic performance and mental health in adolescents: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Journal, 25(4), 235–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Pelayo, N. J. D., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2025). Challenges and coping strategies of a high school honor student enrolled in tertiary education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 7054–7060. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Phenomenology. (2023). In International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/phenomenology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Priyantin, T., Lengkanawati, N. S., Damayanti, I. L., & Yusuf, F. N. (2026). Exploring high-achieving EFL pre-service teachers’ understanding of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) through reflective practice in a microteaching course. Indonesian EFL Journal, 12(1), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v12i1.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Quijada, A. Q., & Alvarez, L. (2023). Cultivating educational seeds: Understanding the experiences of K–8 Latina/o students. In L. Jones & J. Castellanos (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators and students in higher education (pp. 3–17). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Rendor, A., Tulio, P., Arlanza, J., & Matriano, E. (2021). Stress coping mechanisms among college student achievers: A qualitative study. Retrieved from ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Reyes, R. S., & Bautista, R. M. (2021). Academic pressure and mental health issues among senior high school students in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Riley, H., & Durnell, N. (2022). “Every artist is an advocate”: Mentoring high-achieving students and negotiating institutional pressure in student advocacy and research. In Trauma-informed pedagogy and the post-secondary music class (pp. 173–190). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003488200-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Safitri, W. I., Muhid, A., Sholeh, M., & Jainudin, J. (2025). Academic flow among high-achieving students of senior high schools: The role of self-regulated learning and task commitment. Indonesian Psychological Research, 7(2), 194–207. https://jurnalfpk.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/IPR/article/view/1544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sanchez, L. B. (2022). Motivational factors and coping strategies of high academic achievers: A qualitative study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Siripipatthanakul, S., & Phuangsuwan, P. (2023). Self esteem in English learning among higher education students: A qualitative study in Thailand. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/109942246/Self_Esteem_in_English_Learning_among_Higher_Education_Students_A_Qualitative_Study_in_Thailand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Smith, J., & Lee, M. (2024). The role of virtual learning environments in enhancing student resilience and academic performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Steare, T., Gutiérrez Muñoz, C., Sullivan, A., & Lewis, G. (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. The association between academic pressure and adolescent mental health problems: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 339, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Stevanović, A., Božić, R., & Radovic, S. (2021). Higher education students’ experiences and opinions about distance learning during the COVID 19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Stolz, S. A. (2023). The practice of phenomenology in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(7), 822–834. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Tai, Y., & Zhao, X. (2024). Motivation and language learning strategies in academic English achievement. System, 115, 102987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Talley, C. (2024). Academic demands and mental health among high-achieving students: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Tongsukkaeng, W. (2022). Thai high-achieving lecturers and their language learning strategies and motivation: A case study of Kalasin University. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Torres, J. C. (2020). The silent burden: A phenomenological study of academic pressure among Filipino honor students. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Policy, 3(2), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Tucker, M. (2022). Academic resilience among low-income high-achieving students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Tus, J. (2020). Academic Stress, Academic Motivation, and Its Relationship on the Academic Performance of the Senior High School Students. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(11). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345149814_Academic_Stress_Academic_Motivation_and_Its_Relationship_on_the_Academic_Performance_of_the_Senior_High_School_Students [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Wichaidit, P. R. (2025). Understanding growth mindset and chemistry mindsets of high-achieving students and the impact of influential language on learning motivation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 26(2), 420-444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Williams, A. (2024). Delivering effective student feedback in higher education: An evaluation of the challenges and best practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 10(2), 473-501. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Won, G. Y. (2025). Exploring EFL Underachievers' Experience of English Learning With Technology in Classrooms: A Phenomenological Study (Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University Graduate School). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Xu, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, M., Qian, F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of a digital game-based AI chatbot on students’ academic performance, higher-order thinking, and behavioral patterns in an information technology curriculum. Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Yan, Y., & Gai, X. (2022). High achievers from low family socioeconomic status families: Protective factors for academically resilient students. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Zeng, S. A., & Ehrich, J. (2025). Understanding young high-achieving Chinese L2 learners’ experiences: a case study in an Australian primary school. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(10), 3762-3777. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study