Challenges Encountered in the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum

Authors

Sihabodin T. Baguan

College of Education Mindanao State University-Sultan Naga Dimaporo, Lanao del Norte, Philippines (Philippines)

Jonaisah C. Jabbar

College of Education Mindanao State University-Sultan Naga Dimaporo, Lanao del Norte, Philippines (Philippines)

Rhea Mae D. Lim, MSPE

College of Education Mindanao State University-Sultan Naga Dimaporo, Lanao del Norte, Philippines (Philippines)

Asst. Prof. Melcah P. Sambaan

College of Education Mindanao State University-Sultan Naga Dimaporo, Lanao del Norte, Philippines (Philippines)

Asst. Prof. Najeb B. Aloyod

College of Education Mindanao State University-Sultan Naga Dimaporo, Lanao del Norte, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500566

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 8436-8450

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-28

Accepted: 2026-06-02

Published: 2026-06-08

Abstract

This study is a timely and relevant investigation into the implementation challenges of the MATATAG Curriculum within the Philippine elementary education context. It employed a descriptive-correlational research design to identify the challenges encountered by elementary teachers in the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum at Sultan Naga Dimaporo Memorial Integrated School (SNDMIS) during the academic year 2024–2025. A key strength of the study is its use of a descriptive-correlational approach, which appropriately combined the descriptive analysis of implementation challenges with the examination of relationships between demographic variables and curriculum-related issues. The respondents consisted of thirty-one (31) elementary faculty members who were directly involved in curriculum implementation, ensuring that the data gathered were grounded in actual classroom experiences. A validated survey questionnaire was used to gather data on teacher-related, school-related, and system-related challenges, as well as the interventions employed to address them. The study utilized frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean, and Pearson correlation to analyze the data. Findings revealed that teachers encountered moderate to high levels of challenges, particularly in adapting instructional strategies, managing limited resources, and balancing curriculum demands with time constraints. Interventions commonly implemented included collaborative lesson planning, peer mentoring, and localized instructional adaptations. The analysis further showed no significant relationship between teachers’ demographic profile (age, gender, subject taught, and years of teaching) and the challenges encountered, or interventions implemented. These results suggest that curriculum-related difficulties are systemic rather than individual in nature. The study concludes that continuous professional development, adequate resource allocation, and strengthened administrative support are essential to achieving the goals of the MATATAG Curriculum. Moreover, fostering teacher collaboration and contextualizing instructional practices can enhance effective curriculum delivery and sustainability.

Keywords

MATATAG Curriculum, Implementation Challenges, Teacher, Descriptive- Correlational Research

Downloads

References

1. Aquino, R. (2024). Teacher workload and curriculum reform challenges in Philippine public schools. Manila, Philippines: Educational Research Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aguas, L. (2023). Teacher perspectives on curriculum reforms across disciplines. Journal of Educational Development, 12(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albert, J. R., Santos, M., & Cruz, P. (2023). Curriculum standardization and learning outcomes in Philippine basic education. Philippine Education Review, 15(1), 23–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bejasa, F. (2025). Teacher motivation and adaptation in curriculum transitions. Asian Journal of Education Studies, 18(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blasabas, J., & Sumaljag, M. (2021). Curriculum overload and its impact on teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Curriculum Studies, 9(3), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cabug-os, D. (2023). Gender sensitivity in classroom instruction among Filipino teachers. Philippine Journal of Education, 14(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Canlas, P. (2021). Digital literacy challenges among veteran teachers. Journal of Educational Technology in Asia, 10(1), 34–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). MATATAG Curriculum implementation guidelines. Pasig City: Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education (DepEd). (2024). Strengthening support systems for curriculum reform. Pasig City: Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. DepEd Memorandum No. 46, s. 2023. Guidelines on MATATAG Curriculum implementation. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DepEd Order No. 49, s. 2022. Adoption of the MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Estrellado, M. (2023). Effectiveness of curriculum-aligned interventions in public schools. Journal of Instructional Development, 11(2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fabroa, G. (2024). Challenges of rural teachers in technology integration. Philippine Rural Education Journal, 8(1), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gutierrez, H. (2024). Discipline-specific training for effective curriculum implementation. Asian Education Quarterly, 16(3), 77–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hernandez, L., & Llamas, R. (2024). Collaborative mentoring and teacher performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 20(2), 60–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jaca, E., Ramos, T., & Dela Cruz, S. (2021). Teaching experience and instructional readiness. International Journal of Teaching Practice, 7(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lagbao, M. (2024). Teacher responses to rapid curriculum changes. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Laro, K. (2024). Curriculum-driven interventions and learner support systems. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 9(2), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Loza, M. (2024). Gender-related stress among teachers during curriculum transitions. Journal of Social and Educational Studies, 6(1), 90–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Oracion, P., Reyes, A., & Torres, J. (2024). Teacher fatigue and support systems in education reforms. Philippine Journal of Teacher Development, 17(2), 72–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pantao, R. (2021). Alignment of subject content and curriculum standards. Journal of Curriculum Planning, 5(2), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rappler. (2024). Challenges in implementing the MATATAG Curriculum in public schools. Retrieved from https://www.rappler.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sun Times Philippines. (2024). Technology challenges among senior teachers. Retrieved from https://www.suntimes.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Villanueva, C., Gomez, L., & Perez, R. (2023). Gender engagement in professional development programs. Journal of Educational Leadership, 12(4), 66–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Villaruel, M., Santos, D., & Lim, J. (2024). Workload and curriculum implementation issues across subjects. Asian Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 50–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Villaver, R., Dizon, K., & Morales, P. (2024). Teacher readiness and training for curriculum reform. Philippine Journal of Educational Innovation, 10(2), 41–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles