Challenges Faced by Law Enforcers in Combating Illegal Drugs

Authors

Shaina L. Amba

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Raindylyn A. Sumowan

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Robert Florentino

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Armie Lhyn D. Recla

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Dr. Junvil A. Insong

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300362

Subject Category: Criminology

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 4877-4884

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-08

Accepted: 2026-03-14

Published: 2026-04-09

Abstract

Efforts to combat illegal drug activities place law enforcers in demanding operational environments that require sufficient resources, continuous training, and strong community cooperation. This study examined the challenges encountered by law enforcers in the conduct of anti-drug operations, with particular attention to operational constraints, community participation, and officer safety in one of the cities of Misamis Occidental, Philippines. A qualitative research design was employed, using in-depth interviews with law enforcement personnel to document their lived experiences in implementing anti-drug initiatives. The collected data were analyzed through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and issues affecting operational effectiveness. The findings revealed several interconnected challenges in anti-drug enforcement. Six cluster themes emerged from the analysis: resource and logistical constraints, training and adaptability, limited community support, awareness and preventive education, dangers of armed and hostile suspects, and coping mechanisms and safety protocols. Participants reported that shortages in manpower, limited funding, and inadequate operational equipment restrict the ability of enforcement units to sustain proactive operations and respond effectively to the evolving strategies of drug syndicates. The study also found that community cooperation remains limited due to fear of retaliation, mistrust of authorities, and the tendency of some families or community members to protect individuals involved in illegal drug activities. Additionally, officers frequently encounter high-risk situations, including armed resistance and hostile operational environments, which increase both physical danger and psychological strain. The study concludes that the effectiveness of anti-drug operations is influenced not only by enforcement capacity but also by the level of institutional support and community engagement. Strengthening resource allocation, improving logistical support, and expanding continuous professional training may enhance the operational readiness of law enforcement personnel. Furthermore, reinforcing community-based engagement programs and establishing support mechanisms that protect the safety and well-being of officers may contribute to more sustainable and effective anti-drug enforcement efforts.

Keywords

anti-drug operations, law enforcement challenges, community cooperation, policing strategies, operational safety.

Downloads

References

1. Andersen, J. P., & Gustafsberg, H. (2023). Stress exposure training for police officers: Improving decision-making under pressure. Policing: An International Journal, 46(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2022-0102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cordner, G. (2022). Police technology and equipment modernization in contemporary policing. Police Quarterly, 25(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111221090214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. del Pozo, B., Sightes, E., Goulka, J., Ray, B., Wood, C. A., Siddiqui, S., & Beletsky, L. (2021). Police discretion in encounters with people who use drugs: Operationalizing the theory of planned behavior. Harm Reduction Journal, 18(132). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00583-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Espevik, R., Johnsen, B. H., Eid, J., & Thayer, J. F. (2021). Shared mental models and operational effectiveness in high-risk teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 604667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Greer, A., Selfridge, M., Watson, T. M., Macdonald, S., & Pauly, B. (2022). Young people who use drugs: Views toward the power and authority of police officers. Contemporary Drug Problems, 49(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509211058989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Willis, J. J. (2020). Understanding the limits of police staffing and proactive policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(3), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09394-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Manzi, F. (2024). Leadership and planning in high-risk operational policing environments. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nhan, J., Huey, L., & Broll, R. (2020). Digilantism: An analysis of crowdsourcing and the Boston Marathon bombings. British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nix, J., & Wolfe, S. E. (2021). The impact of officer safety concerns on police decision-making. Police Quarterly, 24(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611121996877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Noble, P. S. M. N. (2024). Lived experiences of Philippine National Police drug enforcers in the Eastern Visayas region. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 3(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/32469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Olma, S., Hystad, S. W., & Hetland, H. (2024). Team coordination and shared mental models in high-risk professions. Safety Science, 169, 106321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rouhani, S. (2025). Experiences of a drug decriminalization policy among police and people who use drugs in Baltimore City: A post structural policy analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Spicer, J. (2021). Policing county lines: Responses to evolving provincial drug markets. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54193-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Stapinski, L. A., Reda, B., Newton, N. C., Champion, K. E., Teesson, M., & Slade, T. (2022). Effectiveness of school-based substance use prevention programs: A systematic review. Drug and Alcohol Review, 41(5), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). World Drug Report 2024: Trends and developments. United Nations. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2024.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wilson, J. M. (2024). Reframing the police staffing challenge: A systems approach to workforce planning and workload demand. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zgierska, A. E., White, V. M., Balles, J., et al. (2021). Pre-arrest diversion to addiction treatment by law enforcement: Protocol for the community-level policing initiative. Health & Justice, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00134-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles