Child Maintenance Assessment in Shariah Courts: Integrating Maslahah and Mafsadah for Fairer Outcomes

Child maintenance remains one of the most contested issues in Islamic family law, particularly in the context of judicial assessment within Shariah Courts. Although the obligation to provide maintenance for children is firmly established under Islamic legal principles, the principal challenge lies in determining an amount that is both adequate for the child’s welfare and proportionate to the financial capacity of the father. Existing practices frequently rely on broad judicial discretion without a structured evaluative framework, resulting in inconsistencies, limited transparency, and perceptions of procedural unfairness. This study critically examines the assessment of child maintenance through the integration of maslahah (public interest/welfare) and mafsadah (harm prevention) as foundational principles of maqasid al-shariah. Employing a qualitative normative methodology, the study analyses statutory provisions, classical juristic sources, contemporary scholarship, and selected Shariah Court decisions concerning child maintenance. The findings indicate that current judicial approaches generally acknowledge the child’s needs and the payer’s financial ability, yet these considerations remain implicit and insufficiently operationalised. In many cases, child welfare is narrowly interpreted as basic material needs, while broader dimensions such as education, healthcare, emotional wellbeing, and long-term development receive less systematic attention. Similarly, potential harms to the payer, including excessive financial burden, non-compliance, and prolonged litigation, are rarely assessed within an explicit balancing framework. The study proposes a more structured child maintenance assessment model based on the prioritisation of needs, contextual financial evaluation, and a transparent balancing of welfare and harm. Such an approach would enhance consistency, strengthen judicial legitimacy, and promote fairer outcomes in Shariah Courts. The study contributes to contemporary debates on Islamic family law reform by demonstrating how maqasid-oriented principles can be translated into practical judicial assessment mechanisms.

Child maintenance; Islamic family law

1. Ahmad, B. (2015). Penentuan kriteria kifayah dan ma‘ruf nafkah isteri dan anak di Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya, Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, B., Wahab, M. A., Azahari, R., & Ab Rahman, A. (2016). Pentaksiran nafkah anak berasaskan kriteria kifayah dan ma‘ruf: Kajian kes di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aidid, A. (2023). Access to justice and civil-procedural bargaining. University of Toronto Law Journal, 73(Supplement 1), 3-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aizer, A., & McLanahan, S. (2006). The impact of child support enforcement on fertility, parental investments, and child well-being. Journal of Human Resources, 41(1), 28-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Ghazālī, A. H. (2008). Al-Mustasfa min ‘ilm al-usul. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Shatibi, I. M. (2003). Al-I‘tisam. Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-Hadith. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ashur, M. A. T. I. (2006). Ibn Ashur: Treatise on Maqasid Al-Shariah. Iiit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London, United Kingdom: International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Baderin, M. A. (2003). International human rights and Islamic law. OUP Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Balchin, C. (2009). Family law in contemporary muslim contexts: triggers and strategies for change. Wanted: Equality and Justice in the Muslim Family, 209-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (2014). Multifaceted concept of child well-being. Handbook of child well-being, 1(1), 1-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bradshaw, J. (2013). Child poverty and child well-being in comparative perspective. In A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy, Second Edition (pp. 303-328). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chuku, M. C. (2025). Comparative analysis of islamic law and statutory law on marriage and divorce in nigeria. Alex-ekwueme federal university faculty of law ll. B projects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dimon, Z., & Jusoh, Z. Y. M. (2024). Pengubahan perintah nafkah anak berdasarkan kos sara hidup dari perspektif undang-undang di Malaysia. Journal of Muwafaqat, 7(2), 86–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Durotun, N. (2024). ANALISIS PENENTUAN KADAR NAFKAH ISTRI DAN ANAK PASCA CERAI GUGAT PERSPEKTIF JURIMETRI DAN MASLAHAH MURSALAH (Studi Putusan-Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Kab. Madiun tahun 2023) (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN PONOROGO). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fuad, Z., Abdullah, M., & Karim, R. (2024). Considering debt in the perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah: Maslahah versus Mafsadah. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 9(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hakovirta, M. (2011). Child maintenance and child poverty: A comparative analysis. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(3), 249-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hakovirta, M., Skinner, C., Hiilamo, H., & Jokela, M. (2020). Child poverty, child maintenance and interactions with social assistance benefits among lone parent families: A comparative analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 49(1), 19-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hashem, M. (2024). Maqasid Al-Shari'ah: A Civilizational Perspective. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ibrahim, B. H., & Mohd, A. B. (2013). Hak anak terhadap nafkah dalam perundangan Islam: Sejauh manakah bapa bertanggungjawab menanggung nafkah anaknya. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 25(2), 255-272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ibrhim, A. K., & Nasri, M. S. (2025). Faktor-Faktor Pengabaian Nafkah Anak Di Mahkamah Syariah Melaka. Journal of Law and Governance, 8(1), 45-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ibrhim, A. K., Nasri, M. S., & Ithnan, K. A. (2025). Konsep maslahah dan mafsadah dalam menentukan jumlah nafkah anak yang adil. Jurnal Sains Sosial, 10(1), 37-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ihugba, B. U. (2020). Meaning and Types of Legal Research. In Introduction to Legal Research Method and Legal Writing (pp. 1–12). Malthouse Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8155048.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mutawali, M. (2025). Challenges and Harmonization Between Islamic Law and Human Rights. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(2), 250-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pells, K., & Woodhead, M. (2014). Changing children's lives: risks and opportunities. Young Lives, Department for International Development, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sanusi, T. O. (2025). Maqasid Al-Shariah as an Evaluative Framework for the Digitalisation of Islamic Education:(Contemporary Hermeneutic Approach Study). Permata: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(1), 49-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sonneveld, N., & Lindbekk, M. (2017). Women judges in the Muslim world: A comparative study of discourse and practice. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tanzilulloh, M. I., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Rustamaji, M. (2024, February). Understanding Judicial Discretion: A Comparative Study of judge’s legal reasoning in Civil Law and Common Law Jurisdictions. In International Conference On Law, Economic & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2023) (pp. 551-556). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tyler, T. R. (2024). The legitimacy of legal institutions. In Research Handbook on Law and Psychology (pp. 34-48). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Welchman, L. (2007). Women and Muslim family laws in Arab states: A comparative overview of textual development and advocacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.