Circular Economy and Carbon Neutrality: Synergies, Pathways, and Policy Implications

Authors

Khaizie Sazimah Ahmad

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Joeaiza Juhari

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Najihah Abdul Rahim

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Nani Shuhada Sehat

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Jumaelya Jogeran

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Norhaidah Ahmad

Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM) Melaka Branch (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900112

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 1639-1646

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-04

Accepted: 2026-09-09

Published: 2026-10-02

Abstract

Global climate change, driven by industrialization and dependence on non-renewable energy, has made carbon neutrality an urgent international objective. This paper examines the role of the circular economy as a systemic complement to conventional decarbonization strategies. It argues that renewable energy deployment, carbon capture, and efficiency gains, while necessary, are insufficient without transforming how materials and products are produced, used, and recovered. Drawing on the concept of carbon as both an energy carrier and a material, the paper analyzes the mechanisms through which circular strategies resource efficiency, product life extension, waste valorization, recycling, and industrial symbiosis reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the waste, industrial, agricultural, urban, and energy sectors. A dedicated empirical case study section presents facility, cluster, and economy-level evidence, including an industrial symbiosis network in China that reduced CO₂ emissions by 1.09 Mt per year, equivalent to 3.63% of a city's total carbon footprint under a business-as-usual scenario. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste indicates average global emissions of 89.7 kg CO₂e per tonne in 2023, with open dumping contributing almost 70%, and modelling shows that circular economy implementation could achieve net-zero emissions from global municipal solid waste management by 2050. The paper concludes by discussing policy frameworks in the European Union and China, implementation barriers, and key challenges such as land-use trade-offs of bio-based materials and the high cost of carbon removal technologies, which range from $100 to $1,200 per ton of CO₂.

Keywords

circular economy, carbon neutrality, net-zero emissions, waste management, industrial symbiosis, climate policy

Downloads

References

1. Bassi, F., & Dias, J. G. (2020). Sustainable development of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in the European Union: A taxonomy of circular economy practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2528–2541. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(4), 2277–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Daddi, T., Nucci, B., & Iraldo, F. (2017). Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gautam, P., Salunke, D., Lad, D., & Gautam, A. (2025). Convergent synergy of carbon capture within the circular economy paradigm: a nexus for realizing multifaceted sustainable development goals. Carbon Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-024-00178-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. González-Torres, M., Magrini, C., Rodríguez-Manotas, J., Senatore, V., Beltrán, D. B., & Caldas, M. (2026). Enhancing circularity in EU product policymaking: A case study of a domestic oven using the EcoReport tool. Energy Efficiency, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-026-10423-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hailemariam, A., & Erdiaw‐Kwasie, M. O. (2022). Towards a circular economy: Implications for emission reduction and environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1951–1965. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hoy, Z. X., Woon, K. S., Cheong, C. W., Fan, Y. V., & Yoo, S. J. (2023). Curbing global solid waste emissions toward net-zero warming futures. Science, 382(6672), 797–800. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg3177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Huan, J., & Han, L. (2022). Potential Contribution to Carbon Neutrality Strategy from Industrial Symbiosis: Evidence from a Local Coal-Aluminum-Electricity-Steel Industrial System. Sustainability, 14(5), 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jesús, A. de, & Mendonça, S. (2017). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kara, S., Hauschild, M. Z., Sutherland, J. W., & McAloone, T. C. (2022). Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability? CIRP Annals, 71(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, Y., Wood, L. C., Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., & Farooque, M. (2021). Barriers to sustainable food consumption and production in China: A fuzzy DEMATEL analysis from a circular economy perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Marco‐Fondevila, M., Llena-Macarulla, F., Gastón, S. C., & Jarne-Jarne, J. I. (2020). Are circular economy policies actually reaching organizations? Evidence from the largest Spanish companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McDowall, W., Geng, Y., Huang, B., Barteková, E., Bleischwitz, R., Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., & Doménech, T. (2017). Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Möslinger, M., Ulpiani, G., & Vetters, N. (2023). Circular economy and waste management to empower a climate-neutral urban future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Murakami, S., Shimizu, K., Tokoro, C., & Nakamura, T. (2022). Role of Resource Circularity in Carbon Neutrality. Sustainability, 14(24), 16408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Neves, Â., Godina, R., Azevedo, S. G., & Matias, J. (2019). A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oni, B. A., Oni, O. Y., Sunday, O., Ojo, V. O., & Odofin, O. L. (2025). Synergizing climate mitigation and circular economy: A Comprehensive review for achieving carbon neutrality. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 4(2), 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oo, P. Z., Prapaspongsa, T., Strezov, V., Huda, N., Oshita, K., Takaoka, M., Ren, J., Halog, A., & Gheewala, S. H. (2024). The role of global waste management and circular economy towards carbon neutrality. Liverpool John Moores University, 52, 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ranta, V., Aarikka‐Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S. (2017). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 135, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazançoğlu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Chiesa, V. (2017). Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha), 168, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Xie, X., Fu, H., Zhu, Q., & Hu, S. (2024). Integrated optimization modelling framework for low-carbon and green regional transitions through resource-based industrial symbiosis. Nature Communications, 15(1), 3842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48249-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Msigwa, G., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. (2022). Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zeng, X. (2022). Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles