Circular Economy for Sustainable Animal Feed: Harnessing Sargassum Fluitans for Food Security and Coastal Restoration in Lagos State, Nigeria

In response to growing global concerns over feed scarcity, rising production costs, and coastal degradation, this study explores the transformative potential of Sargassum fluitans within a circular economy framework. The research assessed the sustainability of using this nutrient-rich yet environmentally problematic seaweed as an alternative animal feed ingredient for chickens, fish, pigs, and rabbits in Lagos State, Nigeria. Despite its abundance, Sargassum remains underutilized due to the absence of effective Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) frameworks that ensure project efficiency, economic feasibility, and long-term sustainability. Guided by Implementation Theory and Theory of Change, this study employed a mixed-methods approach. A 12-week randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the nutritional performance, growth metrics, and survival rates of animals fed Sargassum-based diets. Feed safety was ensured through Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP), while Linear Programming Optimization (LPO) developed cost-effective feed formulations. Quantitative data were analyzed using ANOVA and t-tests; qualitative insights were supported by stakeholder engagement and Logical Framework Analysis (LFA). Findings revealed that Sargassum-based feed is nutritionally comparable to conventional feeds and significantly reduced feeding costs by 55.5%. It enhanced animal growth, improved food security, generated green jobs, and contributed to coastal restoration by reducing Sargassum waste buildup. By closing material loops and repurposing marine biomass, the study offers a replicable model for integrating marine resources into sustainable agriculture. The result-based M&E framework ensured accountability, informed decision-making, and scalability, aligning the project with SDGs 2 (Zero Hunger), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), 13 (Climate Action), and 14 (Life Below Water). This research repositions Sargassum from an ecological burden to a blue economy asset, offering a novel, data-driven, and locally adaptable solution for sustainable livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa.

Sargassum fluitans; Circular economy; Sustainable animal feed; Monitoring and evaluation; Blue economy; SDGs; Cost optimization.

1. Abbasi, A., & Jaafari, A. (2018). Project management research and industry-focused innovations. Journal of Modern Project Management, 6(1), 60-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdool-Ghany, A. A., Pollier, C. G., Oehlert, A. M., Swart, P. K., Blare, T., Moore, K., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M. (2023). Assessing quality and beneficial uses of Sargassum compost. Waste Management, 171, 545-556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abdullah, O., Inan, U. H., & Al-Hadidy, A. I. (2021). Benefits of project management to realizing sustainable buildings. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 11(3), 168-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abed El-Fatah, R., Abousekken, M., Zaid, A., El-Tabaa, M., & Gazalla, A. (2024). Effect of dietary supplementation with sargassum muticum algae and Pulicaria Undulate (Rabol) on growth performance, blood parameters, immune response, manure characteristics and ammonia emissions of broilers. International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 3(1), 28-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Abu M. A., Azor, A. A., & Ohioze, E. N. (2021). Challenges of animal production and food security in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development. Retrieved from IJSRED. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Adet, L., Nsofor, G. N., Ogunjobi, K. O., & Camara, B. (2017). Knowledge of climate change and the perception of Nigeria’s coastal communities on the occurrence of sargassum natans and sargassum fluitans. Open Access Library Journal, 4(12), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ajayi, R. A. (2001). Evaluation of extension agents’ job characteristics: a case study of Enugu State agricultural development project, Nigeria. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 8(3), 21-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Akinradewo, O., Aigbavboa, C., Ogunbayo, B., Thwala, D., Tanga, O., & Akinradewo, O. (2022). Construction project planning techniques: awareness, usage and suitability. Production Management and Process Control, 36, 98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Akpotu, E. A., & Chukwuka, C. (2023). Livestock industry in Nigeria: Challenges, current state, and path to transformation. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. Retrieved from NJAP. Retrieved 6, May, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Almadani, I., Ramos, B., Abuhussein, M., & Robinson, A. L. (2024). Advanced swine management: infrared imaging for precise localization of reproductive organs in livestock monitoring. Digital, 4(2), 446-460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.) 495–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Amin, S. A. S., & Sobhi, N. (2023). Process optimization in poultry feed mill. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Anetekhai, M. A. (2023). Aquapreneurship; The pathway to sustainable marine and blue economy. Being a valedictory speech delivered in Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria: Lagos State University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Anetekhai, M. A., Clarke, E. O., Mekuleyi, G. O., & Badmos, L. A. (2024). Evaluation of Sargassum fluitans (Borgessen, 1914) As an alternative energy source in the production of feeds for African catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell, 1822). Nigerian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 12(1), 60-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Anetekhai, M. A., Clarke, E. O., Osodein, O. A., & Dairo, M. T. (2018). Physical, chemical parameters and plankton in a tropical earthen pond catfish farm in Badagry, Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 10(6), 71-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Anetekhai, M., Olateju, I., Nwatulegwu, B., Fagbohun, M., Elegbede, A., & Idowu, O. (2022). The weed sargassum: Valuable bride in circular economic development. Faculty of Science International Conference (FOSIC), 2022. Lagos State University, Ojo. 5th -8th December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Angbulu, S. (2023, October 1). Nigeria’s livestock contribution to GDP lags despite 156 million cattle. Punch Newspapers. https://punchng.com/nigerias-livestock-contribution-to-gdp-lags-despite-156-million-cattle/#:~:text=Despite%20its%20vast%20ruminant%20population,population%20involved%20in%20pastoral%20activities [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Angelo, T.A., & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Anosike, F. U., Rekwot, G. Z., Owoshagba, O. B., Ahmed, S., & Atiku, J. A. (2018). Challenges of poultry production in Nigeria: A review. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 45(1), 252-258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Araújo, R., Vázquez Calderón, F., Sánchez López, J., Azevedo, I. C., Bruhn, A., Fluch, S., ... & Ullmann, J. (2021). Current status of the algae production industry in Europe: an emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 626389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. ArcGIS StoryMaps (29 November 2023). The saga of sargassum. storymaps.arcgis.com/ stories/ed880e039d814e1f94091ac63a4cabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Arellano, G., Cabacas, R., Balontong, A., & Ra, I. H. (2014). A swine management system for plc basd on integrated image processing technique. Smart Media Journal, 3(1), 16-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ashcraft, L. E., Goodrich, D. E., Hero, J., Phares, A., Bachrach, R. L., Quinn, D. A., ... & Chinman, M. J. (2024). A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022. Implementation Science, 19(1), 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. AusAID (2000). AusGUIDElines: the logical framework approach. Canberra: AusAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bakun, A. (1978). Guinea Current upwelling. Nature. 271 (5641): 147–150. Bibcode:1978Natur. 271..147B. doi:10.1038/271147a0. ISSN 1476-4687 Retrieved 6, May, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Barwick, M., Dubrowski, R., & Damschroder, L. (2020). Factors associated with effective implementation: Research and practical implications. Implementation Science 3.0, 81-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Blue Food Assessment. (2023). How aquatic food could serve us. Blue food assessment. Retrieved July 7, 2024, from https://bluefood.earth/news/how-aquatic-food-could-serve-us-axios/ Retrieved 6, May, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Brown-Brandl, T. M., Adrion, F., Maselyne, J., Kapun, A., Hessel, E. F., Saeys, W., ... & Gallmann, E. (2019). A review of passive radio frequency identification systems for animal monitoring in livestock facilities. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 35(4), 579-591. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Burlamaqui, A. B., Poccard-Chapuis, R., De Medeiros, R. D., De Lucena Costa, N., & Tourrand, J. F. (2018). Management and labour in an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system in Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Callistus, T., & Clinton, A. (2018). The role of monitoring and evaluation in construction project management. In Intelligent Human Systems Integration: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2018): Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, January 7-9, 2018, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (pp. 571-582). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Calvani, S., & Chinnanon, S. (2003). A manual on monitoring and evaluation for alternative development projects. A Manual on Monitoring and Evaluation for Alternative Development Projects, 127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Cano, C., Carulla, P., & Villagrá, A. (2024). Welfare, behavior, and housing of rabbits. In veterinary care of farm rabbits: a complete practice guide to rabbit medicine and production (pp. 155-187). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Carbonwave (2021) Sargassum: Turning the tide towards a blue bioeconomy. Online news article• Accessed on 9th December 2021 from https://carbonwave.com/blog-posts/2021-06-09-sargassum-turning-the-tide-towards-a-blue-bioeconomy/ Retrieved 6, May, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Carrillo-Domínguez, S., Rodríguez-Martínez, R. E., Díaz-Martínez, M., Magaña-Gallegos, E., & Cuchillo-Hilario, M. (2023). Potential application of pelagic Sargassum spp. in animal feeding. Journal of Applied Phycology, 35(2), 433-444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Casley, D.J., & Lury, D.A. (1982). Monitoring and evaluation in agriculture and rural development projects. Published for the World Bank: The Johns Hopkins University Press: Washington D.C. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Çelikyürek, H., Karakuş, K., & Kara, M. (2019). Storing and Evaluation of the Records of Livestock Enterprises in Database. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(12), 2089-2094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2019). Statistical Bulletin 2018. Abuja: CBN Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Child, K. (2013). Livestock and Fish monitoring, evaluation and learning framework. Research program on livestock and fish. http://livestockfish.cgiar.org. Accessed on the 3rd of January 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Chinh, H. D., Anh, H., Hieu, N. D., & Radhakrishnan, K. K. (2021). An IoT-based condition monitoring system of biogas electrical generator for performance evaluation. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, 27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Choudhary, B., Khandwal, D., Gupta, N. K., Patel, J., & Mishra, A. (2023). Nutrient composition, physicobiochemical analyses, oxidative stability and antinutritional assessment of abundant tropical seaweeds from the Arabian Sea. Plants, 12(12), 2302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Cilev, G., Pavlovski, Z., Radulovic, S., Stojanovski, S., Pacinovski, N., & Davidovski, Z. (2020). The influence of different part of soybean in mixture for nutrition of one-day chick to 18 weeks age chickens from Italian breed in individual conditions. Journal of Animal Science, 57(4), 38-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Citaristi, I. (2022). Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development—OECD. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022 (pp. 694-701). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Coali, A., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2024). Scientific decision-making, project selection and longer-term outcomes. Research Policy, 53(6), 105022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Coleman, G. (1987). Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal, 2(4), 251-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International journal of project management, 21(5), 363-373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. D’Urso, P. R., Arcidiacono, C., Pastell, M., & Cascone, G. (2023). Assessment of a UWB real-time location system for dairy cows’ monitoring. Sensors, 23(10), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. De Ramon N’Yeurt, A., & Iese, V. (2015). The proliferating brown alga Sargassum polycystum in Tuvalu, South Pacific: assessment of the bloom and applications to local agriculture and sustainable energy. Journal of Applied Phycology, 27, 2037-2045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Dery, T. S. S., Adenyo, C., Kayang, B. B., & Inoue-Murayama, M. (2020). Assessment of feed resources, management practices and mitigating strategies to feed scarcity in grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus) production in north-western Ghana. African Study Monographs, 40(4), 149-172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Desrochers, A., Cox, S. A., Oxenford, H. A., & Van-Tussenbroek, B. (2020). Sargassum uses guide: A resource for Caribbean researchers, entrepreneurs, and policymakers. Bridgetown, Barbados: Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Dlamini, B. C., & Adetunji, A. I. (2023). Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) and food safety management systems. Food Safety and Toxicology: Present and Future Perspectives, 243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In: Dolin, J., Evans, R. (eds) Transforming Assessment. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 4. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Domaćinović, M., Mijić, P., Novoselec, J., Domaćinović, A., Solić, D., & Prakatur, I. (2023). Advantages and Threats of Precise Monitoring and Management Technology Application on Dairy Farms. Poljoprivreda, 29(2), 70-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Doyle, E., & Franks, J. (2015). Sargassum fact sheet. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Drury, M., Fuller, J., & Hoeks, J. (2023). Embedding animals within a definition of sustainability. Sustainability Science, 18(4), 1925-1938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Dubois, O., & Silvius, G. (2020). The relation between sustainable project management and project success. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 9(4), 218-238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Durdikuliyevna, A. A., Anvarovna, C. D., & Zulayho, A. (2019). Formative and summative assessment in teaching process. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(12), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Edmunds, R., & Marchant, T. (2008). Official statistics and monitoring and evaluation systems in developing countries: Friends or foes. Retrieved on February 24, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. El-Khatib, M., Alhosani, A., Alhosani, I., A.l. Matrooshi, O., & Salami, M. (2022). Simulation in project and program management: utilization, challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(4), 731-749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K., & Prasanna, B. M. (2022). Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food security, 14(5), 1295-1319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. European Parliament (2015). Circular economy: Definition, importance and benefits. www.europarl.europa.eu. 2015-02-12. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. EvalCommunity. (2024). Results-based monitoring and evaluation approach. EvalCommunity. https://www.evalcommunity.com/career-center/results-based-monitoring-and-evaluation-approach/ Retrieved 3 Mar. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. FAO (2017). Animal nutrition in FAO and sustainable development goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i6778e/i6778e.pdf Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. FAO (2022). Employment in fisheries and aquaculture. Available at https://www.fao.org/ 3/cc0461en/ online/sofia/2022/fisheries-aquaculture-employment.html. Retrieved 10 , December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. FAO (2020). Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. FAO. (2023). FAOSTAT Food Balances (2010-). Food supply quantity (kg/capita/yr) [dataset]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Statistics Division (ESS). License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. FAO (2023). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. Rome. DOI: 10.4060/cc8166en. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. FAOSTAT analytical brief No 18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/cb3808en/cb3808en. pdf . Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M., ... & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(3), 1381-1418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Farm Animal Welfare Council (2009) Animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future. FAWC, 17 Smith Square, London. http://www.fawc.org.uk.Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, & Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department. (2019). Poultry development review. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nationshttp:// www.fao.org/3/ i353 1e/i3531e00.htm. Retrieved 1/6/2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). https://www.fao.org/news/archive/news-by-date/2021/en/Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022). The future of food and agriculture. Alternative pathways to 2050, FAO, Rome (URL: http://www.fao.org/3/I8429EN/i8429en.pdf). Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Ed.). (2017). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Frey, B. B., Lohmeier, J. H., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Gaskill, M. (2018, August 13). Sargassum Blooms: Too Much of a Good Thing? | Blog | Nature | PBS. Nature. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/blog/sargassum-blooms-much-good-thing. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Gavrilova, N. G. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in Nigeria’s agricultural sector. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Gido, J., Clements, J. & Baker, R. (2018). Successful project management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning Asia Pte Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Gladshtein, V., Pîrlea, G., & Sergey, I. (2024). Small scale reflection for the working lean user. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12733. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Gomez-Zavaglia, A., Prieto L.M. A., Jimenez-Lopez, C., Mejuto, J. C., & Simal-Gandara, J. (2019). The potential of seaweeds as a source of functional ingredients of prebiotic and antioxidant value. Antioxidants, 8(9), 406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Good, L. (2024). 5 Phases of project management life cycle: Complete guide. project-management.com. https://project-management.com/project-management-phases/ Retrieved 15, December, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Gopakumar, C. P., & Deka, R. P. (2020). Standard operating procedures for managing pig breeding farms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Hammer, N. (2017). Evaluation of a UHF RFID system for livestock. Universität Hohenheim. https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/6157. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Haque, M. H., Sarker, S., Islam, M. S., Islam, M. A., Karim, M. R., Kayesh, M. E. H., ... & Anwer, M. S. (2020). Sustainable antibiotic-free broiler meat production: Current trends, challenges, and possibilities in a developing country perspective. Biology, 9(11), 411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Hasan, A. J., & Laszlo, V. (2023). Using agile in implementing agriculture AI projects and farm management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Herbert, S., Hashemi, M., Chickering‐Sears, C., Weis,S., Miller, K., Carlevale, J., Campbell‐Nelson, K., & Zenk, Z. (2017). Basics for livestock and equine nutrition. Center for Agriculture, Food, and the Environment, 24 Feb. 2017, ag.umass.edu/crops-dairy-livestock-equine/fact-sheets/basics-for-livestock-equine-nutrition. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Hirose, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Applying core quality criteria of mixed methods research to an empirical study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Honig, H., Haron, A., Plitman, L., Lokshtanov, D., Shinder, D., Nagar, S., ... & Druyan, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of broiler housing systems: Implications for production and wellbeing . Animals, 14(11), 1665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Ibileke, J. (2017, August 29). Agriculture, the abandoned pathway to Nigeria’s economic diversification and national prosperity. PM News. Retrieved from https://pmnewsnigeria.com/ 2017/08/29/agric-abandoned-pathway-nigerias-economic-diversification-national-prosperity-osinbajo/Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Ibitomi, F. (2024, January 20). Lagos State pledges to provide alternative feed solutions for farmers. Voice of Nigeria. https://von.gov.ng/lagos-state-pledges-to-provide-alternative-feed-solutions-for-farmers/ Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Ijie, B. A. (2023). Impact of Nigeria's agriculture promotion policy on the technical efficiency and income of small-scale palm oil processors in Edo State. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 3(6), 1830-1843. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Ikehi, M. E., Ifeanyieze, F. O., & Nwaokocha, P. O. (2022). Growth performance and cost implications of replacing soybean meal with graded levels of African yam bean (Sphenostylis Stenocarpa) For Weaner Pigs. Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 9 (5), 13-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2011). IFRC monitoring and evaluation guide. Retrieved from https://www.ifrc.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/IFRC-ME-Guide-8-2011.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. International Feed Industry Federation, & Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). Annual report 2020/21. IFIF. https://annualreport.ifif.org/2020-2021/Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2023). Managing for impact in rural development: A guide for project M&E. IFAD. Retrieved from https://www.ifad.org/ documents/38714182/39723123/toc.pdf/e7c718e2-56b9-4f60-b404-3f31448a38a2. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Irshad, Z., Qasim, M., Hajati, H., & Hosseini, S. A. (2024). Functional feed for broiler chickens: exploring Spirulina platensis as a nutritional supplement. World's Poultry Science Journal, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Isaac, J. O. (2021). IOT-Livestock monitoring and management system. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(9), 254-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Jacobson, C., Carter, R. W., Thomsen, D. C., & Smith, T. F. (2014). Monitoring and evaluation for adaptive coastal management. Ocean & coastal management, 89, 51-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Jaikaeo, C., Jansang, A., Li-On, S., Kitisriworapan, S., Tangtrongpairoj, W., Phonphoem, A., ... & Blanchard, M. (2022). Design and field test of a low-cost device for real-time livestock tracking using GPS/LoRa communication. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 38(6), 885-901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. James, Cathy (2011). Theory of Change Review: Report Commissioned by Comic Relief. http://mande.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2012-Comic-Relief-Theory-of-Change-Review-FINAL.pdf. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Jankovic, D., & Faria, R. (2022). Economic evaluation methods and approaches. In Encyclopedia of Evidence in Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Janocha, A., Milczarek, A., Gajownik-Mucka, P., & Matusevicius, P. (2023). Evaluation of the efficiency of computer monitoring based on selected parameters of dairy herd behaviour in relation to daily milk yield. Animal Science and Genetics, 19(3), 23-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Jun, L. I., Yingqing, H. E., Ruru, D. E. N. G., Longhai, X. I. O. N. G., & Ruihao, Z. H. A. N. G. (2024). Remote sensing information extraction of sargassum from the in-shore shallow sea in Daya Bay. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 0(5), 108-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Kabeyi, M. J. B. (2019). Evolution of project management, monitoring and evaluation, with historical events and projects that have shaped the development of project management as a profession. Int J Sci Res, 8(12), 63-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Kennady, V., Chakraborty, S., Biswal, J., & Rahman, H. (2023). Sustainable livestock production: A systematic review of different constraints associated with sustainable livestock production. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 5(2), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Khalifeh, A., Farrell, P., & Al-edenat, M. (2020). The impact of project sustainability management (PSM) on project success: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 453-474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Kim, D. D., & Basu, A. (2021). How does cost-effectiveness analysis inform health care decisions? AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(8), 639-647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Kioko, J. (2010). Project management: Monitoring and evaluation. Richmond Designers and Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Kogen, L. (2018). What have we learned here? Questioning accountability in aid policy and practice. Evaluation 24 (1), 98–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Kothari, C. R. & Gaurav, G. (2020). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers; Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Landau, P. (2024, May 21). Project evaluation Process: definition, methods & steps. Project Manager. https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/improving-project-evaluation-process. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Le Loeuff, J., Boy, V., Morançais, P., Hardouin, K., Bourgougnon, N., & Lanoisellé, J. L. (2023). Air drying of brown algae Sargassum: Modelling and recovery of valuable compounds. Journal of Applied Phycology, 35(4), 1879-1892. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. (2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 400-418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Walsh-Bailey, C., Lyon, A. R., Beidas, R., Mittman, B., ... & Chambers, D. A. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health. Implementation Science, 15, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Lomartire, S., & Gonçalves, A. M. (2023). Algal hydrocolloids: bioactivities and pharmaceutical applications. Marine Drugs, 21(7), 384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. López Miranda, J. L., Celis, L. B., Estévez, M., Chávez, V., van Tussenbroek, B. I., Uribe-Martínez, A., ... & Silva, R. (2021). Commercial potential of pelagic Sargassum spp. in Mexico. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 768470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Louime, C., Fortune, J., & Gervais, G. (2017). Sargassum invasion of coastal environments: a growing concern. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 13(1), 58-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Madan Kumar C, Manvanth G, Mohan Y,Nagesh B.R,Dr. Pavithra G.,Dr. T.C.Manjunath(2023). An AI-driven well-being and health monitoring setup for science and engineering applications. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Sciences, 6(7), 23-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Maddock, N. (2023). On the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural development projects. Academia.edu. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/94377166/On_the_monitoring_and_evaluation_of_agricultural_development_projects. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Mallick, P., Muduli, K., Biswal, J. N., & Pumwa, J. (2020). Broiler poultry feed cost optimisation using linear programming technique. Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, 3(1), 31-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Mamphogoro, T. P., Mpanza, T. D. E., & Mani, S. (2024). Animal feed production and its contribution to sustainability of livestock systems: An African perspective. The Marginal Soils of Africa: Rethinking Uses, Management and Reclamation, 37-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Marcelino-Sádaba, S., González-Jaen, L. F., & Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. (2015). Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Mark, S., & Lurie, Y. (2018). Customized project charter for computational scientific software products. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 18(1), 165-176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Matu, J., Kyalo, D., Mbugua, J., & Mulwa, A. (2020). Stakeholder participation in project planning: A prerequisite to the effective completion of urban road transport infrastructure projects in Kenya. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 8(1), 73-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Mekuleyi, G. O. (2022). Environmental health status and aqua-economics of some aquatic ecosystems in Badagry division of Lagos State, South West Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation, Lagos State University]. Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Mendeja, K. L. D., Dulce, N. R., Martinez, V. U., Tuazon, C. N., Gaspado, J. M., & Magnaye, N. A. N. A. (2023). A Development using the Rapid Application Model of peTrace: Peter’s poultry supply sales and monitoring management system. International Journal of Metaverse, 1(1), 21-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Miller, G. J. (2021, September). Artificial intelligence project success factors—beyond the ethical principles. In Special Sessions in the Advances in Information Systems and Technologies Track of the Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (pp. 65-96). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Moslen, M., & Miebaka, C. A. (2024). Population growth and environmental pollution in the global south. In Biomonitoring of Pollutants in the Global South (pp. 127-152). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

128. Murray-Webster, R., & Dalcher, D. (2019). APM Body of Knowledge. (7th ed ed.) Association for Project Management; Princes Risborough. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

129. Mwangi, N. N., & Moronge, M. (2020). Role of a logical framework on monitoring and evaluation of public-private partnerships projects in Nairobi County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(4), 224 – 239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

130. Myer, Y.& Maddock, T.(n.d.): Guideline for using alternative feedstuffs for livestock. University of Florida IFAS Extension. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

131. Naeem, M., Bedford, M. R., Burton, E. J., & Azhar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the effect of pelleting on the particle size of commercial poultry feeds: A case study. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 33(1), 10-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

132. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF). (1992). CCP Decision Tree [Flowchart]. Retrieved on the 9th of July 2024 from https://www.fda.gov/ food/hazard-analysis-critical-control-point-haccp/haccp-principles-application-guidelines. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

133. National Bureau of Statistics (2023). Nigeria: Contribution Oil Sector to GDP 2023 | Statista. Statista, 27 Sept. 2023, www.statista.com/statistics/1165865/contribution-of-oil-sector-to-gdp-in-nigeria. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

134. National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Foreign trade in goods statistics (2016-2019). National Bureau of Statistics. https://nigerianstat.gov.ng/elibrary/read/1241099. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

135. National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Foreign trade in goods statistics (Q1 2024). National Bureau of Statistics. https://nigerianstat.gov.ng/pdfuploads/FTS_Q1_2024.pdf. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

136. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2023). The impact of climate change on coastal erosion. Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/climate/coastal-erosion. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

137. Nesamvuni, A. E., Tshikolomo, K. A., Lekalakala, G. R., Petja, B. M., & Van Niekerk, J. (2022). A framework to monitor and evaluate the vulnerability of smallholder livestock farmers: a case study of Limpopo & Mpumalanga Provinces. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 29, 732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

138. Nichols P. (1999). An introduction to the logframe approach: Course workbook & materials. Melbourne: IDSS; 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

139. Nigeria Coastline – Geography (2023). www.indexmundi.com/nigeria/ coastline.html# google_vignette. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

140. Nilsen, P. (2020). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Implementation Science 3.0, 53-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

141. Nimco, J. S., & Kaumbulu, A. K. (2024). Unpacking project implementation: the effective role of monitoring and evaluation systems in Local Non-Governmental Organization in Somaliland. Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 30-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

142. Nzeka, U.M., & Beillard, M.J. (2019). Animal Feed Sector Snapshot – 2019. Global agricultural information network, report NG-19005. Fas.usda.gov. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

143. Odife, I. (2024). The Nigerian State and agricultural intervention: Experiences in Anambra State, 1976-1991. Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities (NJAH), 4(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

144. Odunuga, S., Badru, G. & Bello, O. M. (2014). Climate change, sea level rise and coastal inundation along part of Nigeria Barrier Lagoon Coast. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 18(1), 41-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

145. Okafor, A. E. (2021). Influence of monitoring and evaluation system on the performance of projects. Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 6(8), 34-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

146. Okereke, O. C. (2017). Causes of failure and abandonment of projects and project deliverables in Africa. PM World Journal, 6(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

147. Okereke, O. C. (2020). Achieving Successful and Sustainable Project Delivery in Africa: How to Implement Effective and Efficient Project Management Practices and Policies. Productivity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

148. Okon, U. M., Ekpo, J. S., & Christopher, G. I. (2023). Effect of Monodora myristica (African nutmeg) as feed additive on rabbit’s carcass composition and serum lipid profile. Animal Research International, 20(2), 4957-4965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

149. Orieno, O. H., Ndubuisi, N. L., Eyo-Udo, N. L., Ilojianya, V. I., & Biu, P. W. (2024). Sustainability in project management: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 656-677. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

150. Owusu, W. A., Marfo, S. A., & Osei, H. (2024). Sargassum-to-energy: A review of bioethanol production and its significance in Ghana. Sustainable Environment, 10(1), 2299541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

151. Oyeniyi, O. T., Abiodun, A. J., Moses, C. L., & Osibanjo, A. O. (2016). Research methodology: with simplified step-by-step application of SPSS package. Pumark Nigeria Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

152. Oyesiku, O. O., & Egunyomi, A. O. O. O. A. E. (2014). Identification and chemical studies of pelagic masses of Sargassum natans (Linnaeus) Gaillon and S. fluitans (Borgessen) Borgesen (brown algae), found offshore in Ondo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

153. Pardilhó, S., Cotas, J., Pereira, L., Oliveira, M. B., & Dias, J. M. (2022). Marine macroalgae in a circular economy context: A comprehensive analysis focused on residual biomass. Biotechnology Advances, 60(10), 79-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

154. Pari, R. F., Uju, U., Hardiningtyas, S. D., Ramadhan, W., Wakabayashi, R., Goto, M., & Kamiya, N. (2024). Ulva Seaweed-Derived Ulvan: A Promising Marine Polysaccharide for Biomaterial Design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

155. Pasian, M. B. (Ed.). (2015). Designs, methods and practices for research of project management. Gower Publishing, Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

156. Pehu, E. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation for World Bank agricultural research and extension projects: A good practice note. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/ en/research. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

157. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press Simon and Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

158. Poultry Association of Nigeria (2024 September 6). Home - PAN-Poultry Association of Nigeria. PAN-Poultry Association of Nigeria. https://poultryassociationofnigeria.org/. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

159. Pourkhalili, K., Karimi, Z., Farzaneh, M. R., Ehsandoost, E., Mohammadi, M., Lotfipour, M., & Akbari, Z. (2021). Renoprotective effect of fucoidan from seaweed Sargassum angustifolium C. Agardh 1820 on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity: From marine resources to therapeutic uses. Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products, 17(2), 16-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

160. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

161. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

162. Putman, N. F., & He, R. (2013). Tracking the long-distance dispersal of marine organisms: sensitivity to ocean model resolution. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20120979. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

163. Raba, D., Gurt, S., Vila, O., & Farres, E. (2020). An Internet of Things (IoT) solution to optimise the livestock feed supply chain. Computer Science & Information Technology, 10(4), 103-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

164. Rajauria, G. (2015). Seaweeds: A sustainable feed source for livestock and aquaculture. In Seaweed sustainability (pp. 389-420). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

165. Rakhimov, O., Khidirova, D., Manzarov, Y., & Yavkochdieva, D. (2024). Results of the study of rotary feed pump with separator and screw feeder. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 95, p. 01023). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

166. Rocha C.P. (2021). Seaweeds as valuable sources of essential fatty acids for human nutrition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(9), 49-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

167. Rodríguez-Hernández, N. S., Arango, M., Moreno-Conn, L. M., Arguello, J. O., Bernal-Riobo, J. H., & Pérez-López, O. (2023). Grassland management effect on ecosystem services in the livestock system in an oxisol from the Eastern high plains of Colombia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1107466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

168. Salma, L., Aymen, E. M., Maher, S., Hassen, A., Chérif, H., Halima, C., ... & Mimoun, E. (2014). Effect of seaweed extract of Sargassum vulgare on germination behaviour of two bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L) under salt stress. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 7(2), 116-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

169. SAP Integrated Report. (2024). SAP contributions to economic resilience and environmental conservation. Retrieved from SAP Integrated Report 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

170. Saratale, R. G., Kumar, G., Banu, R., Xia, A., Periyasamy, S., & Saratale, G. D. (2018). A critical review on anaerobic digestion of microalgae and macroalgae and co-digestion of biomass for enhanced methane generation. Bioresource Technology, 262, 319-332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

171. Sarnighausen, V. C. R., de Souza Silva, A. C., & Moraes, S. O. (2021). Greenhouse gas emission in Cattle Livestock System, the challenge in quantification and mitigation strategies: meta-synthesis. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais, 12(1), 417-435. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

172. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. &Thornhill, A. (2023) Research methods for business students. 9th Edition, Pearson, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

173. Seaweed in Nigerian languages (n.d.). Online translator Translate.com. https://www.translate.com/ dictionary/igbo-english/okpuru-mmiri-26664354. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

174. Shojaeipour, A., Falzon, G., Kwan, P., Hadavi, N., Cowley, F. C., & Paul, D. (2021). Automated muzzle detection and biometric identification via few-shot deep transfer learning of mixed breed cattle. Agronomy, 11(11), 23-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

175. Silvius, A. G., & Van-Den Brink, J. (2014). Taking responsibility: The integration of sustainability and project management. Advances in project management: Narrated journeys in unchartered territory, 137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

176. Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2022). Changing patterns of the Gulf Stream. Journal of Marine Science. Retrieved from https://www.journalofmarinescience.com/gulf-stream. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

177. Smith, W.C. & Benavot, A. (2019). Improving accountability in education: The importance of structured democratic voice. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

178. Solarin, B. B., Bolaji, D. A., Fakayode, O. S., & Akinnigbagbe, R.O. (2014). Impacts of an invasive seaweed Sargassum hystrix var. fluitans (Børgesen 1914) on the fisheries and other economic implications for the Nigerian coastal waters. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 7(7), 1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

179. Somagond, A., Aderao, G. N., Girimal, D., & Singh, M. (2024). Animal feeding and watering technologies. In Engineering Applications in Livestock Production (pp. 37-62). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

180. Sowah, W. N. A., Jayson-Quashigah, P. N., Atiglo, D. Y., & Addo, K. A. (2022). Socio-economic impact of sargassum influx events on artisanal fishing in Ghana. Research square, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1861970/v1 L. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

181. Spillias, S., Kelly, R., Cottrell, R. S., O’Brien, K. R., Im, R. Y., Kim, J. Y., ... & McDonald-Madden, E. (2023). The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, 2(2), 10-042. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

182. Sultana, F., Wahab, M. A., Nahiduzzaman, M., Mohiuddin, M., Iqbal, M. Z., Shakil, A., Mamun, A., Khan, M. S. R., Wong, L., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2023). Seaweed farming for food and nutritional security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and women empowerment: A review. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 8(5), 463-480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

183. Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011-1013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

184. Taye, H., Bendapudi, R., Swaans, K., Hendrickx, S., & Boogaard, B. (2018). Outcome mapping as a monitoring and evaluation tool for livestock value chain interventions: the case of imGoats. J Multidiscip Eval, 14, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

185. Taylor, R. B., Sotka, E., & Hay, M. E. (2002). Tissue-specific induction of herbivore resistance: seaweed response to amphipod grazing. Oecologia, 132, 68-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

186. Texas A&M Oceanographer part of team battling Gargantuan seaweed blob. (n.d.). https:// artsci.tamu.edu/news/2023/04/texas-aandm-oceanographer-part-of-team-battling-gargantuan-seaweed-blob.html. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

187. The 5Ps of the SDGs: People, planet, prosperity, peace and partnership. (n.d.). https://unsdg.un.org/latest/videos/5ps-sdgs-people-planet-prosperity-peace-and-partnership. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

188. The Georgia Basin Inter-Agency Theory of Change Project. (2017). Theory of Change: A Short Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

189. Tholhappiyan, T., Sankar, S., Selvakumar, V., & Robert, P. (2023, August). Agriculture monitoring system with efficient resource management using IoT. In 2023 Second International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS) (pp. 1628-1633). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

190. Thompson, T. M., Young, B. R., & Baroutian, S. (2020). Efficiency of hydrothermal pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of pelagic Sargassum for biogas and fertiliser recovery. Fuel, 279, 118527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

191. Tobin, C. T., Bailey, D. W., Stephenson, M. B., Trotter, M. G., Knight, C. W., & Faist, A. M. (2022). Opportunities to monitor animal welfare using the five freedoms with precision livestock management on rangelands. Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 928514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

192. Tun, S. C., Onizuka, T., Tin, P., Aikawa, M., Kobayashi, I., & Zin, T. T. (2024). Revolutionizing cow welfare monitoring: A novel top-view perspective with depth camera-based lameness classification. Journal of Imaging, 10(3), 67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

193. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population division. (2022). World population prospects 2022: Summary of results. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

194. United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Handbook on monitoring and evaluating for results. Retrieved from https://popp.undp.org/document/4631/download. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

195. United Nations Environment Programme (2023). A Beginner’s Guide to Sustainable Farming. UNEP, www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/beginners-guide-sustainable-farming.Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

196. UNSDG (2023). unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/universal-values/leave-no-one-behind. Retrieved 10, December, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

197. Van-Mierlo, B. C. (2011). Approaches and methods for monitoring and evaluation. Syscope Magazine, 2011(summer), 31-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

198. Wang, M., Hu, C., Barnes, B. B., Mitchum, G., Lapointe, B., & Montoya, J. P. (2019). The great Atlantic sargassum belt. Science, 365(6448), 83-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

199. Warinda, E. (2019). Evaluating operationalisation of integrated monitoring and evaluation system in Kisumu County: Implications for policy makers. African Evaluation Journal, 7(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

200. Water, Engineering and Development Centre School of Civil and Building Engineering (2011). Introduction to the logical framework. WEDC, Loughborough University: London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

201. Weiss, C.H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families in New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Aspen Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

202. Wicha, S., Noinan, K., Yamsa-Ard, S., Kamhangwong, D., Chaisricharoen, R., & Sureephong, P. (2023, November). Decision model of Walk-Over-Weighing System (WoW) for support the fattening process of beef cattle farm. In 2023 7th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT) (pp. 498-502). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

203. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

204. Willard, B. (2005). The next sustainability wave: Building boardroom buy-in. New Society Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

205. Wilmcow, S. (2012). HACCP implementation in food manufacturing. HACCP Europa Publication. 5, June, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

206. Wisitpongphan, N., & Khampachua, T. (2016). Agile in public sector: Case study of dairy farm management projects. In 2016 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

207. WorldBank(2024).Overview. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

208. AgricultureandFood. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview#:~:text=Last%20Updated%3A%20Mar%2015%2C%202024%20Agriculture%20can%20help,with%20%248.1%20billion%20in%20new%20commitments%20in%202013. Accessed on 21 June 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

209. World Bank. (2013). Toolkit for monitoring and evaluation of agricultural water management. 5, June, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

210. World Health Organization. (2003). Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. 5, June, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

211. Zawyya, W. S. (2022, November 10). Over 56,000 projects worth $2.7bln “abandoned” in Nigeria in 20 years. ACE Times. https://www.zawya.com/en/economy/africa/over-56-000-projects-worth-27bln-abandoned-in-nigeria-in-20-years-s8ityiix. Retrieved 5, June, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Comparative Effects of Oven and Microwave Drying on Nutrient Retention and Consumer Acceptability of Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus)
• Bamboo Shoots (Bambusa Vulgaris) Bites: A Flavorful Twist On Siomai
• Relevance of Scanning Electron Microscope and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technique in Food Research: A Review
• Effect of Drying Conditions on Nutrient Content of Dried ‘Nsukka’ Yellow Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L)
• Analysis of Proximate and Phytomicrobial Properties of Fluted Pumpkin and white Leadwort Obtained from Some Botanical Gardens in Warri South Local Government