Classroom Assessment Practices for Formative and Authentic Assessment at SJK (C) Yuk Cheng
Authors
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business Education, Social Science and Humanities, Department of Management Science, Isra University, Hyderabad, Pakistan (Pakistan)
GV Universal Resources, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700523
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 7668-7685
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-22
Accepted: 2026-07-27
Published: 2026-08-06
Abstract
This study aims to examine the implementation of Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA), focusing on formative and authentic assessment practices at SJK (C) Yuk Cheng, Tanah Merah, Kelantan. Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA), introduced by the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) in 2017, is designed to assess students holistically by evaluating the cognitive (intellectual), affective (emotional and spiritual), and psychomotor (physical) domains in alignment with the objectives of the Standard-Based Primary School Curriculum (KSSR) and the National Education Philosophy (NEP). A total of 24 teachers from various academic disciplines participated in this study, selected through a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire developed by the research team and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods through Google Forms. The findings indicate that the choice of assessment instruments plays a significant role in influencing students' interest in learning. Selecting appropriate assessment instruments not only enhances students' engagement and motivation but also contributes to more effective teaching and learning processes in the classroom. These findings highlight the importance of implementing formative and authentic assessment practices that support meaningful learning and foster students' holistic development.
Keywords
Perception, Workshop Effectiveness, Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA)
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad Zaidi Husin. (2019). Model amalan pentaksiran formatif dalam kalangan guru-guru Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu (pp. 1–223). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baskaran, K., Pillai, R. V., & Kunhikannan, S. K. (2021). Keberkesanan pelaksanaan bengkel Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD). Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 19(1), 51–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Che Aleha Ladin. (2015). Pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah pendidikan seni visual (pp. 1–408). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Danielson, C. (2017). Assessment for learning: For teachers as well as students. In The Future of Assessment (pp. 191–213). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (1994). Kamus Dewan (3rd ed.). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ting, D., Chzin, J., & Surat, S. (2021). Sorotan literatur bersistematik: Faktor-faktor mempengaruhi pencapaian akademik pelajar. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(12), 137–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Halimatus Saadiah Kariya. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian akademik pelajar Politeknik METRO Betong Sarawak. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(4), 9–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Idris Mohd Radzi. (2016). Perancangan pentaksiran formatif guru pelatih dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Asian People Journal, 3(1), 152–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Pilai, K. G., & Kutty, F. M. (2022). Sikap guru Bahasa Melayu dalam pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(5), e001522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Buku Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Salleh, M., Sarkowi, A., Hamid, H. A., Jafar, M. F., & Arif, Z. M. (2019). Tahap literasi guru terhadap pendekatan dalam Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 9, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Abu Hassan, M. A., & Musa, K. (2020). Tahap profesionalisme guru sekolah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 9(2), 37–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Saad, N., & Sankaran, S. (2000). Pembuatan keputusan kolaboratif: Sikap guru dan galakan pengetua. Universiti Utara Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Atan, N. A., Yaakob, N., Shafie, N., & Mohamed, Z. (2020). Amalan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) bagi pentaksiran autentik dalam kalangan guru sekolah rendah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nurul Akmar, S. (2020). Pentaksiran alternatif: Pentaksiran prestasi, autentik, portfolio dan kaedah pelaksanaan pentaksiran prestasi. Sains Humanika, 2(2000), 51–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Faudzi, N. H., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Kesediaan guru sejarah melaksanakan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. In International Conference on Business Studies and Education (ICBE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Primus, V. W., Mosin, M., & Musirin. (2021). Pengurusan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah murid berkeperluan khas dalam program pendidikan inklusif di sekolah rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(8), 59–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Talib, R., & Abd Ghafar, M. N. (2008). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen bagi mengukur tahap literasi pentaksiran guru sekolah menengah di Malaysia. In Proceedings of Seminar Penyelidikan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mohd Nor, S., & Haron, Z. (2023). Instrumen literasi Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah guru sekolah berdasarkan konteks pendidikan di Malaysia: Sorotan literatur bersistematik (SLR). Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(4), e002261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Abd. Mutalib, S. (2016). Penggunaan teknik pentaksiran formatif dalam subjek Bahasa Melayu Darjah Satu: Kajian kes. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Abd. Mutalib, S., & Kanreng, M. Z. (2017). Pelaksanaan KBAT dalam pentaksiran formatif bagi slot tunjang komunikasi Bahasa Melayu: Kajian kes. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-kanak, 6(1), 18–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tan Jia Yuh. (2020). Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dan prestasi murid Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di Hulu Langat, Selangor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mahamod, Z. (2012). Inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study