Classroom Environmental Quality and Learner Performance in Zambia: A Multidimensional Regression Analysis

Authors

Kadonsi Kaziya

Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education and Sociology of Education the University of Zambia (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200159

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 2092-2108

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-23

Accepted: 2025-12-01

Published: 2026-01-05

Abstract

The quality of classroom environments is widely acknowledged as central to academic success, yet limited empirical evidence exists on how specific environmental dimensions predict learner outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. In Zambia, where disparities in infrastructure, teaching practices, and psychosocial supports remain pronounced, rigorous statistical analysis of these relationships is scarce. This study sought to determine whether classroom environmental quality significantly predicts learner performance, to identify the most influential dimensions, and to quantify their explanatory power. A correlational quantitative design was employed, drawing on data from 200 secondary school learners across urban and rural schools. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression were used to examine the predictive effects of physical, psychosocial, and instructional dimensions on academic performance. Findings revealed that psychosocial factors were rated most positively (M = 3.78, SD = 0.65) and correlated most strongly with learner performance (r = .63, p < .01). The regression model was statistically significant, F(3, 196) = 24.85, p < .001, explaining 27% of the variance in learner performance. Psychosocial factors (β = .41, p < .001) emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by instructional (β = .26, p < .001) and physical (β = .18, p < .01) factors. These results highlight the predictive role of classroom quality in shaping academic achievement and demonstrate that psychosocial and instructional dimensions are particularly critical. The study contributes new evidence from Zambia to educational psychology, with implications for teacher training, policy reform, and targeted investments aimed at improving equity and learning outcomes.

Keywords

classroom environment, learner performance, psychosocial factors, regression analysis, Zambia

Downloads

References

1. Ahmed, N. and Pierre, D. (2024). The role of classroom management in enhancing learners’ academic performance: teachers’ experiences. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i1.364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajimudin, A., & Mukuna, T. (2024). Family support and academic outcomes: Evidence from educational settings. Educational Psychology Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arai, M., Tsubaki, H., & Sagisaka, Y. (2021). Evidence-based statistical evaluation of japanese l2-learners’ proficiency using principal component analysis. SHS Web of Conferences, 102, 01005. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110201005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aşıksoy, G. and Özdamlı, F. (2017). The flipped classroom approach based on the 5e learning cycle model - 5elfa/nastavni pristup obrnute učionice uutemeljen na 5e modelu ciklusa učenja. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i4.2564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … & Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Pergamon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brooks, D. (2011). Space matters: the impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chelliq, N., Zaki, K., & Nsengiyumva, J. (2024). Motivation influences on learning: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Costa, C., Cardoso, A., Lima, M., Ferreira, M., & Abrantes, J. (2015). Pedagogical interaction and learning performance as determinants of academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 874-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Duncan, M., Patte, K., & Leatherdale, S. (2021). Mental health associations with academic performance and education behaviors in canadian secondary school students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(4), 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573521997311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor, R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Erasmus, S., Eeden, R., & Ferns, I. (2022). Classroom factors that contribute to emotional intelligence in the case of primary school learners. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Farid, M., Setiawan, D., Solichin, M., Noviana, N., & Sari, V. (2024). The effect of school infrastructure quality and economic factors on academic achievement of high school students in east java. WSSHS, 2(02), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i02.687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fauth, B., Wagner, W., Bertram, C., Göllner, R., Roloff, J., Lüdtke, O., … & Trautwein, U. (2020). Don’t blame the teacher? the need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1284-1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Findley, B. and Varble, D. (2011). Creating a conducive classroom environment: classroom management is the key. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (Ctms), 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.19030/ctms.v2i1.5252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fraser, B. J. (2015). Classroom learning environments. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 394–408). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jafari, S. and Asgari, A. (2020). Predicting students’ academic achievement based on the classroom climate, mediating role of teacher-student interaction and academic motivation. Integration of Education, 24(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.062-074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jančiauskas, M. (2018). Emotional safety and self-esteem as pivotal factors in learner engagement: Perspectives from mixed methods research. International Journal of Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Johnson, L., Monroe, G., & McKoy, J. (2020). Psychological and social supports in education: An integrative review. American Educational Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kadri, H., Widiawati, W., Susanti, L., & Ermita, E. (2022). Dimension of tangible in quality of higher education services based on undergraduate student’s perception., 56-64. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-33-6_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Khavere, S., Ogutu, J., & Bota, K. (2023). Students’ perception of teacher classroom effectiveness and academic achievement: a case of secondary school students in hamisi sub-county, kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kolbe, M., Robinson, T., & Thompson, M. (2019). The importance of teacher-learner interactions in motivating students: A survey study. Teaching and Teacher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kraft, M., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: a meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lim, C. and Fraser, B. (2018). Learning environments research in english classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9260-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mabena, M., Musonda, S., & Mbulu, M. (2021). Addressing biases in educational research: The necessity for accounting covariates in learner performance studies. Journal of African Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mapulanga, M. (2019). Investigating physical classroom environment: The impact of lighting and ventilation on student concentration. Zambia Journal of Educational Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Muthivhi, A., & Kriger, M. (2019). A pedagogical approach to instructional practices on student outcomes: Regression-based analysis. Journal of Mathematics Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Närhi, V., Kiiski, T., Peitso, S., & Savolainen, H. (2014). Reducing disruptive behaviours and improving learning climates with class-wide positive behaviour support in middle schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.986913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ntshuntshe, Z. and Mathwasa, J. (2022). The marginalised and voiceless children: an in-depth look into psycho-social support in schools. E-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2022.1901.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Oluwatelure, T. (2010). Classroom learning environments as a correlate of scientific literacy. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Tlc), 7(6). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v7i6.124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Recalde, J., Palau, R., & Márquez, M. (2021). How classroom acoustics influence students and teachers: a systematic literature review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Reyes, M., Brackett, M., Rivers, S., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Roorda, D., Koomen, H., Spilt, J., & Oort, F. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sandilos, L., Rimm‐Kaufman, S., & Cohen, J. (2016). Warmth and demand: the relation between students' perceptions of the classroom environment and achievement growth. Child Development, 88(4), 1321-1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shaheen, N., Ahmad, N., & Shah, R. (2020). Quality university education through conducive classroom learning environment. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (Rjsser), 1(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss1-2020(76-84) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Şirin, D., & Şahin, H. (2020). Examining the relationship between gender and performance: Insights from logistic regression analysis. Educational Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sorbet, L., & Barnes, R. (2020). Effects of instructional practices on cognitive load and student performance: A comprehensive survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Sorbet, S. and Barnes, C. (2020). Using positive behavior role plays to prepare teacher candidates for the classroom: an exercise for classroom management. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 4(2), p145. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v4n2p145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Telio, M., Delmastro, S., & Leslie, A. (2016). Feedback mechanisms that build trust and engagement among learners: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Educational Effectiveness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Tosto, M., Asbury, K., Mazzocco, M., Petrill, S., & Kovas, Y. (2016). From classroom environment to mathematics achievement: the mediating role of self-perceived ability and subject interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wali, Y., Ahmad, F., Muhammad, A., & Mustapha, A. (2019). Impact of classroom environment on students` performance in english language. JEP. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/10-17-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wong, K., Lee, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Sociocultural influences on performance assessments: The impact of perceived biases. Cultural Studies of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Yidana, P. (2025). Predictors of the higher education psychosocial learning environment: students’ perspectives. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 08(01). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles