Client Adaptation to Virtual Pag-IBIG Services

Authors

Riza Mae H. Gerodias

North Eastern Mindanao State University (Philippines)

Roel T. Lim

North Eastern Mindanao State University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200621

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 8734-8758

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-06

Accepted: 2026-03-11

Published: 2026-03-23

Abstract

The digital transformation of government services has been promoted to improve efficiency, accessibility, and client experience; however, the successful implementation of such platforms depends largely on users’ readiness to adopt them. This study assessed the readiness of clients of the Pag-IBIG Fund – San Francisco Branch and its extension office, the Tandag Member Services Office, to adopt Virtual Pag-IBIG services for loan and benefit transactions. Specifically, the study examined clients’ demographic profile and their level of readiness in terms of digital literacy, perceived usefulness and ease of use, trust and perceived security, accessibility and usability, and legal awareness and institutional support. Persistent reliance on in-branch transactions, despite the availability of online services, underscored the need for a localized assessment of client readiness in a provincial setting.
The study employed a descriptive research design and involved 122 Pag-IBIG clients selected through convenience sampling. Data were gathered using a validated and reliable structured questionnaire and were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tools. Results showed that clients were generally Much Ready to adopt Virtual Pag-IBIG services, with legal awareness and institutional support and perceived usefulness and ease of use obtaining the highest mean ratings. Significant differences in readiness were found when respondents were grouped according to income level, internet connectivity, and type of digital device used, while age, sex, and educational attainment showed no significant differences. Security concerns, unfamiliarity with the system, and limited digital skills emerged as the most common barriers. Based on the findings, a Client Adoption Enhancement Framework was developed to strengthen digital literacy, trust, accessibility, and institutional support. The study provided empirical evidence to guide Pag-IBIG Fund administrators and policymakers in improving inclusive and effective digital service delivery at the branch level.

Keywords

Virtual Pag-IBIG, Client readiness, Digital literacy

Downloads

References

1. Alhassan, I., & Abdulai, M. (2021). Determinants of e-government adoption in Ghana: A descriptive study. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 13(2), 45–56. https://academicjournals.org/journal/JPAPR [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Okaily, R., Al-Qirim, N., & Al-Fraihat, D. (2022). Technology acceptance model in e-government adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., & Saleh, M. (2021). The role of intrinsic motivation in digital service adoption: Evidence from government platforms. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 1051–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10027-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Andaya, E. J., Orlina, R. J. G., & Ilustre, R. G. (2025). Digital governance in the Philippines: A scoping review of current challenges and opportunities. Global Sustainability Research, 4(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.56556/gssr.v4i1.1204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2020). Trust and risk in e-government adoption: Lessons from citizen surveys. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2021). The role of trust in e-government adoption. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 17(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021040103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2022). A meta-analysis of citizen adoption of e-government services. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10115-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2022). More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 87(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mangarin, R. (2024). Exploring contributing factors on poor digital literacy of students: A review of existing studies. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 4(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v4i1.312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Marbibi, A., Masinas, A., et al. (2022). Demographics and awareness of Pag-IBIG Fund’s e-government service among private employees in the Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358494961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mensah, I., & Adams, R. (2020). E-government adoption: The effect of perceived security and trust on usage intention. Information Development, 36(5), 601–615.https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920911630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Digital service transformation: Hybrid models for e-government implementation. Public Management Review, 23(7), 1010–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1814391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Policarpio, R. J., & Magpantay, E. (2024). The impact of digital access and literacy on women’s e-commerce adoption in the Philippines. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Technology, 2(1), 35–47. https://ujost.org/index.php/journal/article/view/154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rahman, A., & Hamid, N. (2022). Assessing citizen readiness for e-government services in Malaysia: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of E-Government Research, 18(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.301557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2020). Digital inequalities and access disparities in e-government services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1611526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Senate Economic Planning Office. (2025). Transforming public service delivery through e-government (Policy Brief No. 2025-02). https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/publications/PB_TransformingPublicService.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Taherdoost, H. (2020). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 9(1), 18–27. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3205035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Valle, J. S., Bugayao, Z. R., Gutierrez, C., & Malang, B. P. (2024). Impact of e-government technologies on citizen engagement and service delivery: A case study of local government units in Caloocan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(4), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.04.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2020). The third-level digital divide: Digital skills and inequalities in digital service adoption. Information, Communication & Society, 23(8), 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1615290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2021). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and empirical validation in e-government adoption. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(4), 1061–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1941363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, X., Chen, L., & Li, H. (2023). Descriptive study of digital platform adoption in public service: Evidence from China. Journal of Digital Government Studies, 5(3), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541296231124598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles