Collaborative Governance and Sustainable Youth Empowerment in Lagos and Osun States, Nigeria

Youth empowerment in Nigeria continues to be constrained by limited access to learning opportunities, skills acquisition, employment, entrepreneurial financing, leadership inclusion, and democratic participation, particularly within fragmented subnational governance systems. When institutionalised effectively, collaboration among pertinent stakeholders provides a structured mechanism through which youth empowerment initiatives can be planned, financed, and sustained. This study is grounded in collaborative governance theory to examine how institutionalised stakeholder engagement shapes youth empowerment outcomes at the subnational level. Youth empowerment is conceptualised through empowerment theory as a multidimensional expansion of economic, social, and political agency, while transformative governance provides a normative lens for assessing the sustainability and institutional embeddedness of these outcomes.
The study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods methodology to examine youth empowerment efforts in Lagos and Osun States, which represent two divergent governance contexts within Nigeria's federal system. Quantitative survey data from youth beneficiaries are integrated with qualitative interviews of institutional actors to evaluate the impact of collaborative arrangements on empowerment outcomes and the sustainability of youth empowerment programmes over time.
The results reveal that formal stakeholder engagement substantially predicts enhancements in economic, educational, and civic empowerment outcomes. Nonetheless, inadequate coordination structures, insufficient youth representation in decision-making processes, and financial limitations hinder sustainability. The research contends that sustained youth empowerment is optimally perceived as a governance result influenced by the quality of collaboration infrastructure, rather than only by the extent of programme scope or the magnitude of finance.
This paper situates youth empowerment within the framework of collaborative governance studies, extending theoretical insights to subnational contexts in the Global South and emphasising the institutional requirements that enable multi-actor arrangements to provide sustainable developmental outcomes.

Collaborative governance, Stakeholder collaboration, Subnational governance

1. Adhikari, B. (2024). An educational study focused on the application of a mixed methods approach as a research method. OCEM Journal of Management, Technology & Social Sciences, 3, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.3126/ocemjmtss.v3i1.62229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinyetun, T. S. (2021). Youth political participation, good governance and social inclusion in Nigeria: Evidence from Nairaland. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth, 13(2), 1–13. http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index/php/cjfy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31311629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bango, B. (2023). The role of local government in the empowerment of youth-owned small,medium, and micro enterprises in Cape Town [Master’s thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology]. https://etd.cput.ac.za/handle/20.500.11838/3899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2019). Regulating collaboration: The legal framework of collaborative governance in ten European countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1658771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berñe, A. L., Planas-Lladó, A., Vila-Mumbrú, C., & Valdivia-Vizarreta, P. (2023). Factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment, according to social educators. Journal of Youth Studies. https://www.emerald.com/insight/1443-9883.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: Models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cahill, H., & Dadvand, B. (2018). Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. City Population Admin. (2022). Nigeria: Administrative divisions, states and local government areas. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/nigeria/admin/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Connor, D. M. (1988). A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77(3), 248–257. https://geog.sdsu.edu/People/Pages/jankowski/public_html/web780/Connor_1988.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creighton, J. (2022). Social science tools for natural resource managers. Natural Resources, 13, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2022.136009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dube, B., Nkomo, D., & Apadile-Thokweng, M. (2024). Pragmatism: An essential philosophy for mixed methods research in education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Elder-Vass, D. (2022). Pragmatism, critical realism, and the study of value. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(3), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2022.2049088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Elgeddawy, M., & Abouraia, M. (2024). Pragmatism as a research paradigm. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 23, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.23.1.2444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Enaifoghe, A., Maramura, T., Durokifa, A., Maduku, H., Ekanade, I. K., & Chiwarawara, K. (2024). Examining the critical role of youth participation as catalysts for sustainable social and economic development. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(5), e1124. https://ojs.journalsdg.org/jlss/article/view/1124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Eze, O. F. (2023). Skill acquisition for youth empowerment and reduction of unemployment in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies, 16(2), 641–663. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajpas/article/view/260407/245845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fares, J., Chung, K. S. K., & Abbasi, A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0255658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Farthing, R. (2015). Why youth participation? Some justifications and critiques of youth participation using New Labour’s youth policies as a case study. Youth & Policy, 116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298745098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Federal Government of Nigeria. (2021). National policy on population for sustainable development. National Population Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Federal Ministry of Youth and Sports Development. (2021). Nigerian Youth Employment Action Plan (NIYEAP) 2021–2024. Federal Republic of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ganeshu, P., Fernando, T., & Keraminiyage, K. (2023). Barriers to, and enablers for, stakeholder collaboration in risk-sensitive urban planning: A systematised literature review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hafer, J., Ran, B., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Rethinking perspectives of power in collaborative governance. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8(2), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.8.2.260-280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Heath, S., & Moreau, K. (2024). Involving youth in empowerment evaluation: Evaluators’ perspectives. Canadian Journal of Programme Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.73987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ile, I., & Boadu, E. (2018). The paradox of youth empowerment: Exploring youth intervention programme in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1528709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). (2023). Citizen participation in local governance in Africa: A selection of case studies. International IDEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. International Labour Organisation (ILO). (2020). Global employment trends for youth 2020: Africa. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_626831/lang--en/index.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. International Labour Organisation. (2024a). Global employment trends for youth 2024: Decent work, brighter future. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. International Labour Organisation (ILO). (2024b). World employment and social outlook: Trends for youth 2024. https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/world-employment-and-social-outlook-trends-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jennings, L. B., Parra-Medina, D. M., Hilfinger-Messias, D. K., & McLoughlin, K. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kelly, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organisational processes. Methodological Innovations, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Khasanah, R. P., Purnomo, E. P., & Kasiwi, A. N. (2020). Collaborative governance in national community empowerment programmes in poverty alleviation. JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA, 9(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.31232/42240a/211.-2/55 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kimpact Development Initiative (KDI). (2020). Legislative brief Osun Youth Agenda. Osun Youth Development Commission (OYDC) Establishment Bill, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. LibreTexts. (n.d.). Exponential growth model . In College Mathematics for Everyday Life. Retrieved September 9, 2025, from https://libretexts.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Longley, R. (2021, September 20). What is political participation? Definition and examples. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/political-participation-definition-examples-5198236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mauthner, N. S. (2020). Research philosophies and why they matter. In M. Townsend (Ed.), . How to keep your doctorate on track (pp. 76–86). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975636.00018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Milagres, R., Silva, S., & Rezende, O. (2019). Collaborative governance: The coordination of governance networks. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 18, 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342761205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Miyano, S. (2021). Youth development in Africa: From the current paradigm to the alternative. Journal of Human Security Studies, 10(1), 21–38. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jahss/10/1/10_21/_pdf/-char/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2022). Demographic statistics bulletin, 2022. National Bureau of Statistics, Demographic Statistics Division. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. National Population Commission [NPC] Nigeria. (2020). Nigeria population projection and demographic indicators—State and national. Abuja, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ndukwe, C., Offiah, G. A., Okpata, F. O., Odo, S. I., & Aluko, H. A. (2023). Good governance and youth empowerment: A recipe for sustainable development. African Journal Online. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jpds/article/view/253533/239548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Newo, A. O., Oladipo, O. V., Ayankoya, R. A., & Olanrewaju, M. K. (2023). Entrepreneurship and youth development in Nigeria: Policies, practices and effectiveness. Covenant Journal of Entrepreneurship (CJoE), 7(1). https://journals.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/index.php/cjoe/article/3775/1545/8074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Nmadu, T. (2023). Youth empowerment: A strategic instrument to curb insecurity in Nigeria. Lapai International Journal of Administration (LIJAD), 6(2). https://ojs.ibbujournals.com.ng/index.php/lijad/article/download/923/1234/6211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ofusori, T. (2025). The challenge of youth unemployment and its implications for democratic stability in Africa. https://ddp.org.za/blog/the-challenge-of-youth-unemployment-and-its-implications-for-democratic-stability-in-africa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ogunyewo, A. O., & Oluwasuji, C. O. (2023). The Nigerian youth and the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Dealing with the roadblocks. Zamfara Journal of Politics and Development, 4(1). https://zjpd.com.ng/index.php/zjpd/issue/view/7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Olonade, O. Y., George, T. O., Imhonopi, D., Egharevba, M. E., & Kasa, A. G. (2022). Youths’ socio-economic well-being in Southwest Nigeria: What role can empowerment/poverty reduction programmes play? Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2115694. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2115694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Youth stocktaking report. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Osuagwu, O. E., Agbasonu, V. C., Ndigwe, C., Eze, I., & Sulaiman, U. (2015). ICT and pragmatism: Creating sustainable employment for graduates in Nigeria. West African Journal of Industrial and Academic Research, 13(1), 42. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/wajiar/article/view/120414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. (1995). Empowerment theory, research and application. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14354763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Planas-Lladó, A., & Úcar, X. (2022). Evaluating youth empowerment: The construction and validation of an inventory of dimensions and indicators. American Journal of Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211055643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rosado-Cubero, A., Freire-Rubio, T., & Hernández, A. (2022). Entrepreneurship: What matters most. Journal of Business Research, 144, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sanyang, R. (2021). Youth empowerment as a tool for implementation of the right to development in Africa. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354537447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Schruijer, S. (2020). The dynamics of interorganisational collaborative relationships: Introduction. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Sharma, L. R., Bidari, S., Bidari, D., Neupane, S., & Sapkota, R. (2023). Exploring the mixed methods research design: Types, purposes, strengths, challenges, and criticisms. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajll.2023.v05i01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Shishima, S. D. (2018). Youth empowerment and sustainable development in Nigeria. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/37509154/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. The Street Journal (TSJ). (2022). Lagos youth population potential asset for rapid economic transformation. https://thestreetjournal.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Trivedi, V., & Patel, V. (2023). Empowering youth: Building a strong foundation for tomorrow. VIDYA - A Journal of Gujarat University, 2, 118–120. https://doi.org/10.47413/vidya.v2i2.218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). World youth report 2022: Youth and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. United Nations (UN). (2023, March 28). Global issues: Who are the youth? https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/youth [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. United Nations. (2024). Young people’s potential, the key to Africa’s sustainable development. https://www.un.org/ohrlls/news/young-people%E2%80%99s-potential-key-africa%E2%80%99s-sustainable-development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UNDESA]. (2012). Empowerment: Definitions and perspectives. http://social.un.org/empowerment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (n.d.). Definition of youth. Prepared by the United Nations Inter-Agency Network on Youth Development, coordinated by the Focal Point on Youth, UNDESA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Human development report 2019: Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Urdal, H. (2006). A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00416.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Voets, J., Brandsen, T., Koliba, C., & Verschuere, B. (2021). Collaborative governance. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Vorng, P. (2025). Youth empowerment and civic engagement: Best practices for engaging youth in policy and governance. Governance, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1234/2025-VP-006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Waziri, M., & Idris, A. (2019). Youth empowerment programme in Nigeria: A strategy for poverty alleviation and national development. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v2i3.921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Waziri, M., Lawal, J. U., & Haliru, I. Y. (2022). The impact of youth empowerment scheme programme for self-reliance and poverty alleviation in Nigeria. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra10633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. World Bank. (2006). World development report 2007: Development and the next generation. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. World Bank Group. (2023). Investing in youth, transforming Africa. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/06/27/investing-in-youth-transforming-afe-africa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2000). Stakeholder collaboration: Building bridges for conservation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Zimmerman, M. A. (2012). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organisational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions