Collaborative Learning Practices and Academic Engagement Influencing Mathematics Achievement Among Senior High School Students

Authors

Alvin D. Ganate

Sultan Kudarat State University, ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines (Philippines)

Allan Jay S. Cajandig

Sultan Kudarat State University, ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800500

Subject Category: Learning

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 7709-7714

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-28

Accepted: 2026-08-25

Published: 2026-09-10

Abstract

This study addressed the persistent challenge of improving Mathematics achievement among Senior High School students despite the increasing implementation of learner-centered and collaborative instructional approaches in Mathematics education. It examined the relationship between collaborative learning practices and Mathematics achievement and determined the influence of academic engagement on Mathematics achievement among Senior High School students in General Mathematics. Guided by Vygotsky's Social Constructivist Learning Theory, Johnson and Johnson's Cooperative Learning Model, and the ICAP Framework of Engagement, the study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design. Grade 11 students enrolled in General Mathematics were selected through cluster sampling (n = 288). Data were collected using a validated Collaborative Learning Survey Questionnaire, a teacher-rated Academic Engagement Observation Rubric, and a pilot-tested 50-item General Mathematics Achievement Test. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that collaborative learning practices were highly evident (M = 3.82, SD = 0.09), with accountability receiving the highest rating. Interactive engagement was the predominant type (30.2%), while students demonstrated satisfactory Mathematics achievement (M = 82.10, SD = 7.73). A significant moderate positive relationship was found between collaborative learning practices and Mathematics achievement (r = .433, p < .001), with group processing exhibiting the strongest relationship (r = .506, p < .001). Mathematics achievement also differed significantly across engagement types, F(3, 151) = 4.00, p = .009, η² = .074, with students demonstrating interactive and constructive engagement obtaining significantly higher achievement than those demonstrating active engagement. The study concluded that collaborative learning practices and academic engagement significantly contributed to students' Mathematics achievement, highlighting the importance of strengthening collaborative learning experiences and promoting higher levels of academic engagement.

Keywords

Mathematics

Downloads

References

1. Alvarez, M. T., & Dalida, R. M. (2020). Collaborative learning and mathematics performance among senior high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(4), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Socio-emotional skills and Filipino students' mathematics achievement: Insights from international large-scale assessments. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Factors influencing mathematics achievement among Filipino students: The role of engagement and collaborative learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(4), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational outcomes: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 30, 100327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Casinillo, L. F., Lacandula, M. J., & Zanoria, M. J. (2023). Collaborative learning and mathematics achievement among Grade 7 students. Philippine Journal of Education Research Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chi, M. T. H. (2014). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 219–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2013). Implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 10533 (Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept and state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. García-Martínez, J. A., et al. (2021). Cooperative learning strategies in mathematics classrooms and their impact on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hernandez, J. P., & Bautista, L. R. (2021). Collaborative learning strategies and students' mathematics achievement in senior high school. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 789–804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Järvelä, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2023). Engagement in collaborative learning environments: Processes and outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, Y., & Xue, H. (2023). The mediating role of student engagement in collaborative learning and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 190, 104625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2019). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 613–651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Villanueva, M. L., & Cruz, E. P. (2022). Emotional intelligence and collaborative learning outcomes in secondary mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 95–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang, L., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). Direct and indirect effects of collaborative learning on academic achievement: The mediating role of engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, 101294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhu, M., & Urhahne, D. (2020). Teacher support and collaborative learning in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles