Colonialism and Communal/Border Disputes: The Akure–Isikan/Isolo Affair in Historical Perspective

Insecurity is commonly understood as the actual outbreak of violence, yet this reading is too narrow. Disputes and disagreements capable of precipitating a serious breakdown of law and order constitute, in themselves, a latent form of insecurity, whether or not they culminate in bloodshed. Communal clashes over chieftaincy and boundary questions are a recurring feature of Nigerian public life, and they routinely prompt government commissions of inquiry charged with tracing root causes and recommending remedies. Far less attention, however, has been paid to the much larger number of disputes that have never reached that terminal stage — disagreements that persist for generations without resolving into open violence but that nonetheless corrode trust, entrench division, and periodically threaten to erupt. The Akure–Isikan/Isolo chieftaincy and border dispute in present-day Ondo State is one such case. This article traces the dispute to the colonial encounter, arguing — on the basis of the documentary and comparative-historiographical evidence available, and pending the fuller archival research identified below — that the British administration's technology of rule in Western Nigeria, most notably the compilation of "Intelligence Reports" during the reorganization of Native Administrations, was significantly implicated in converting a more fluid, layered, and historically contested relationship between Akure, Isikan, and Isolo into a rigid hierarchy of paramount and subordinate authorities. In doing so, the colonial state did not merely record local history; on the reading advanced here, it reshaped it, hardening an ambiguity that had once permitted coexistence into a fixed and contested hierarchy, and in the process likely helped plant seeds of mistrust that continue to structure litigation and unrest a century later. The article concludes that the "created" traditions of origin, and in particular the chieftaincy hierarchies inherited from the colonial period, require serious and sustained appraisal — by historians, by government, and by the communities themselves — if their afterlife in local government administration and in the machinery of dispute resolution is to be properly understood and responsibly managed.

colonialism; communal disputes; chieftaincy institutions; Intelligence Reports

1. "Bribery, Imposition Allegations Rock Ondo Community Over Oba's Selection." New Telegraph (Lagos), September 13, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. "Chiefs and Rural Health Services in South-Western Nigeria, c. 1920–c. 1950s." Social History of Medicine 35, no. 2 (2022): 589–611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. "Councils and Indirect Rule in British Africa." NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. "Deji of Akure Sacks Iralepo of Isikan." Roving Reporters, February 21, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. "Indirect Rule in Nigeria and Its Impact on Traditional Rulers." HistoricalNigeria.com, October 23, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. "Indirect Rule, Africa." Encyclopedia.com. Accessed August 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. "Operation of Colonial Indirect Rule Policy and Political-Social Vices in Nigeria." International Journal of Law, Politics & Humanities Research 9, no. 6 (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. "Two Princes at War over Iralepo Chieftaincy Stool in Ondo." The Street Journal, October 24, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. "Uneasy Calm in Akure Kingdom, Isikan Community Tackles Deji over Chieftaincy Stool." Punch (Lagos), November 1, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. "You Can Only Become King in Nollywood Movies, Deji of Akure Tells New Isikan King." Tribune (Ibadan), October 26, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Afigbo, A. E. The Warrant Chiefs: Indirect Rule in Southeastern Nigeria, 1891–1929. London: Longman, 1972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Akintide, Wumi. "Isinkan Kingdom and Akintide's Crocodile Tributes to Osolo to Further Akure's Hegemony." Vanguard (Lagos), July 31, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Atanda, J. A. The New Oyo Empire: Indirect Rule and Change in Western Nigeria, 1894–1934. London: Longman, 1973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Falola, Toyin, and Matthew M. Heaton. A History of Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Galtung, Johan. "Violence, Peace, and Peace Research." Journal of Peace Research 6, no. 3 (1969): 167–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lugard, Frederick D. Political Memoranda: Revision of Instructions to Political Officers on Subjects Chiefly Political and Administrative. London: Waterlow, 1906. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mamdani, Mahmood. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: James Currey, 1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Perham, Margery. Native Administration in Nigeria. London: Oxford University Press, 1937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Agarwood: A Fragrant Link between India and Southeast Asia
• Pens of Protest: Malayalam Press in the Freedom Struggle
• Long-Term Trends of Temperature and Rainfall in Sivakasi: A Climatic Assessment (1980–2025)
• Iran’s Forgotten Friend William Morgan Shuster: Victim of Anglo-Russian Conspiracy
• The (Moordkop) Murder Hill Massacre 1830: A Historical Analysis of the Griqua-Ndebele Conflict