Combating Patronage Politics: Depoliticizing Ayuda Using John Rawls’ Distributive Justice in the Philippines

This study provides a philosophical investigation of the distribution of ayuda in the Philippines within the context of entrenched patronage politics. While government assistance programs such as the SAP, AICS, and AKAP aim to alleviate poverty and aid vulnerable sectors, their actual implementation has often been compromised by political favoritism and electoral manipulation. This study argues that such practices morally undermine the fairness and integrity of social assistance, transforming public entitlement rooted in justice into political indebtedness. Rooted in John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness, highlighting the equal liberty principle and the difference principle, this research assesses whether ayuda distribution can be publicly justified to citizens as free and equal members of society. While Rawls provides a strong normative framework focused on impartiality and priority for the least advantaged, his theory presumes a well-ordered society, an assumption challenged by political realities in the Philippines, characterized by weak institutions and relational norms. To address this limitation, the study proposes a hybrid normative framework that integrates Rawlsian principles with the Filipino moral values of pakikipagkapwa (shared humanity) and bayanihan (communal solidarity). While these values sustain moral motivation, they must be constrained by an institutionalized standard of impartiality to prevent their distortion by patronage. Ultimately, this research contends that neither Rawls nor Filipino values alone are sufficient to depoliticize ayuda. A culturally resonant yet institutionally constrained hybrid framework is necessary to completely transform ayuda into a genuine instrument of social justice rather than a mechanism of patronage politics.

Ayuda, patronage politics, John Rawls, pakikipagkapwa

1. Abad, M. (2021, April 8). What went wrong in 2020 COVID-19 ‘ayuda,’ lessons learned for 2021. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/what-went-wrong-in-2020-covid-19-ayuda-lessons-learned-for-2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abad, M. (2025, February 20). Which forms of ‘ayuda’ are allowed, banned during the 2025 elections? Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/elections/forms-aid-assistance-allowed-banned-polls-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abante, M., Diaz, M. L., Lipata, A., Tagacay, M. E., & Vigonte, F. (2023, October 17). The effects of ayuda distribution among indigent individuals from the local government unit: A literature review. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4604884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Albert, J.G., Crismo, J.J.L., Genio, F.G. (2025, March 20). Assessing the Implementation of Joint Programming in Government Social Protection and Economic Inclusion Interventions in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Almario, V. S. (2010). UP Diksiyonaryong Filipino, Binagong Edisyon. Anvil Publishing Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anastacio, A., & Morandarte, N. (2023, February 17). Political patronage in Philippine local politics. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4362736 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Apostol, V. (2020). Ameliorating the Social Amelioration Program [Review of Ameliorating the Social Amelioration Program]. In L. Go (Ed.), Business World, Yellow Pad. https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2020/08/09/310101/ameliorating-the-social-amelioration-program/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baclig, C. E. (2021). Corruption scandals amid pandemic: When doctors shout for change. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1502434/corruption-scandals-amid-pandemic-when-doctors-shout-for-change [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Barrameda, A. S., & Barrameda, T. (2011). Rebuilding communities and lives: The role of damayan and bayanihan in disaster resiliency. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 3, 132–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Barrientos, A. (2016, February 29). Justice-based social assistance. Global Social Policy, 16(2), 151–165. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1468018116633576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Biraogo, L. (2025, February 13). The hidden cost of ayuda: Are government handouts solving poverty or perpetuating it? Kweba ni Barok. https://kwebanibarok.com/2025/02/11/the-hidden-cost-of-ayuda-are-government-handouts-solving-poverty-or-perpetuating-it/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Belgica, J. (2024, November 28). The Ayuda Republic: Legal plunder and false philanthropy. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2024/11/28/opinion/columns/the-ayuda-republic-legal-plunder-and-false-philanthropy/2012246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (20). How clientelism varies: Comparing patronage democracies. Democratization, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Campbell, J. (2020). Buying the honor of thieves? Performance pays, political patronage, and corruption. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 63, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Capulong, H. G. (2021). Mindfulness as key in easing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Journal of Public Health, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cervantes, F. M. (2020). Vaccines, social amelioration program prioritized in 2021 budget [Review of Vaccines, social amelioration program prioritized in 2021 budget]. Philippines News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1124961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chavez, C. (2021). Corruption? Favoritism? DILG urges public to file complaints on cash assistance distribution. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/4/8/corruption-favoritism-dilg-urges-public-to-file-complaints-on-cash-assistance-distribution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cleofas, J. A. (2016, March). An account of virtue and solidarity from pakikipagkapuwa. Quest: Studies on Religion & Culture in Asia, 1, 73–86. https://research.ateneo.edu/en/publications/an-account-of-virtue-and-solidarity-from-pakikipagkapuwa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Colonnelli, E., Prem, M., & Teso, E. (2020). Patronage and selection in public sector organizations. American Economic Review, 110(10), 3071–3099. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. del Castillo, F. A., & Perdido, M. S. (2022). ‘Bayanihan:’ Protecting communities from the cost-of-living crises. Journal of Public Health, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Department of Interior and Local Government. (2020, September 12). 89 Punong Barangays nationwide suspended over SAP Tranche 1 anomalies. https://dilg.gov.ph/news/DILG-89-Punong-Barangays-nationwide-suspended-over-SAP-Tranche-1-anomalies/NC-2020-1307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (n.d.). Assistance to individuals in crisis situation (AICS). https://aics.dswd.gov.ph/aics-program/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2013, January 31). DSWD says NO to Epal and yes to empowering Pantawid Pamilya beneficiaries. https://pantawid.dswd.gov.ph/2013/01/dswd-says-no-to-epal-and-yes-to-empowering-pantawid-pamilya-beneficiaries/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2022). Department’s Memorandum Circular No. 15, Series of 2022. Quezon City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2024). Department’s Memorandum Circular No. 04, Series of 2024. Guidelines in the implementation of the Ayuda sa Kapos ang Kita Program (AKAP). https://www.dswd.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MC_2024-004.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Doctolero, J. (2023, August 3). ‘Ayuda’ programs to continue despite lifting of State of Public Health Emergency. Philippine Information Agency. https://pia.gov.ph/ayuda-programs-to-continue-despite-lifting-of-state-of-public-health-emergency/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Eadie, P., & Yacub, C. (2023). COVID-19 and aid distribution in the Philippines: A patron-clientelist explanation. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2218807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the third world. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 3–18. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1981-22322-001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Flores, A. (2022, February 15). Ayuda—The Philippines’ Covid-19 social protection response. Institute of Development Studies. https://alumni.ids.ac.uk/news/blogs-perspectives-provocations-initiatives/642/642-Ayuda-The-Philippines-Covid-19-social-protection-response [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Farolan, R. (2013). The Filipino bayanihan spirit. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2013/11/25/opinion/columnists/the-filipino-bayanihan-spirit/52033/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Freeman, S. (2007). Rawls. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Galang, J. R., Gopez, J. M., Capulong, H. G., & Gozum, I. E. (2021). Solidarity as a companion virtue in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Gonzales, C. (2020, April 8). How Bayanihan became the heart of Filipino tradition. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/move-ph/bayanihan-heart-filipino-tradition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Gozum, I. E., & Aguas, J. J. (2022, January 22). Rawlsian distributive justice and the Philippine Ayuda program during the pandemic. Philosophia International Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.23.1.a.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Gozum, I. E., Capulong, H. G., Galang, J. R., & Gopez, J. M. (2021). An ayuda to the least advantaged: Providing a program for those who were hit the hardest during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Gudmalin, C., Perante-Calina, L., & Balbosa, J. (2021). Protecting the poor and vulnerable against the pandemic. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/protecting-poor-and-vulnerable-against-pandemic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Gutierrez, J. (2021). Community pantry movement in the Philippines. Global Voices. https://globalvoices.org/2021/04/26/community-pantry-movement-in-the-philippines-a-truly-grassroots-initiative/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hernandez, C. J. D., Gozum, I. E. A., & Delgado, C. A. A. (2024). Community pantry as a form of Bayanihan in the light of Alber Camus’ concept of rebellion. XLinguae, 17(3), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2024.17.03.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Hutchroft, P. (2019). Strong patronage, weak parties: The case for electoral system redesign in the Philippines. Briefer. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Strong-Patronage-Weak-Parties-Briefer.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. iPES Food. (2025, July 28). Brazil beats hunger. Press Release. https://ipes-food.org/brazil-beats-hunger/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kreuzer, P. (2020). Patronage democracy and the politics of coercion: Characteristics and legitimacy. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26192.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kuker, M. L. (2025, July 28). Ayuda or abuse? The unfair cost of political loyalty. Medium. https://medium.com/@monetluker/ayuda-or-abuse-the-unfair-cost-of-political-loyalty-d7881e9dd13a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mabizela, H. N. (2024). Political patronage: A catalyst for corruption and misgovernance in South Africa. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(15), 9627. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Maboloc, C. R. (2024, November 8). The question of justice in contemporary liberal theory. ElziStyle Bookshop. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Macapagal, E. J., Ofreneo, M., Montiel, C., & Nolasco, J. (2013). Social psychology in the Philippine context. Ateneo de Manila University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Magalhaes, J., Ziebold, C., Evans-Lacko, S., Matijasevich, A., & Paula, C. S. (2024, October 14). Health, economic and social impacts of the Brazilian cash transfer program on the lives of its beneficiaries: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 24, 2818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20046-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Menguin, J. (2020). Bayanihan: The culture that turns ordinary Filipinos into heroes. The Filipino Beat. https://jefmenguin.com/bayanihan/#:~:text=Bayanihan%2C%20pronounced%20%2F%CB%8C%CA%8C%C9%AA%C9%99%CB%88ni%CB%90han%2F%2C,core%2C%20bayanihan%20is%20about%20unity [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Michelbach, P. A., Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Doing Rawls justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms. Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology, 186. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Mulder, N. (2013). Filipino identity: The haunting question. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(1), 55–80. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/186810341303200103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Naher, N., Hoque, R., Hassan, M. S., Balabanova, D., Adams, A., & Ahmed, S. M. (2020). The influence of corruption and governance in the delivery of frontline health care services in the public sector: A scoping review of current and future prospects in low and middle-income countries of South and South-East Asia. BMC Public Health, 20, 880. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08975-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Noda, K. (2011). Politicization of Philippine budget system: Institutional and economic analysis on pork barrel. Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance, Government of Japan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Olver, C. (2021). Power, institutions and rents in two South African cities. Area Development and Policy, 6(3), 250–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Palatino, M. (2025, January 16). The politics of ‘ayuda’ in the Philippines. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2025/01/the-politics-of-ayuda-in-the-philippines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Parrocha, A. (2020). Pensioners excluded from receiving P5K–P8K aid: IATF. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1098927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Pellicer, M., Wegner, E., Bayer, M., & Tischmeyer, C. (2019). Clientelism from the client’s perspective: An empirically grounded conceptual framework. UCD-Dublin, School of Politics & International Relations, Working Paper 15. https://t1p.de/6l9f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Pilapil, R. (n.d.). John Rawls and distributive justice in a globalizing world. Social Science Diliman, 15(1), 1–24. https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/download/6766/5865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024, August 15). 11 out of 18 regions recorded significant decreases in poverty incidence in 2023. https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/poverty [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Politiko. (2024, December 18). ‘Bigger and louder’: Pork barrel returns in Ayuda system–Greco Belgica. Politiko. https://politiko.com.ph/2024/12/18/bigger-and-louder-pork-barrel-returns-in-ayuda-system-greco-belgica/politiko-lokal/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO). (2020, March 24). Bayanihan: The Filipino spirit of communal unity. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/bayanihan-filipino-spirit-communal-unity/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Punongbayan, J. C. (2025, February 14). [In this economy] Ayuda concerns in the Philippines and abroad. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/in-this-economy-ayuda-aid-concerns-philippines-abroad/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Punongbayan, J. C., & Suzara, Z. N. (2025, March). Rethinking ayuda for sustainable development. International Center for Innovation, Transformation, and Excellence in Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice: Revised edition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Republic of the Philippines. (2020). Republic Act No. 11469: Bayanihan to Heal as One Act. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2020/03mar/20200324-RA-11469-RRD.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Reliefweb. (2024, October 7). DSWD continues giving ‘ayuda’ through various programs like AICS, AKAP. https://reliefweb.int/report/philippines/dswd-continues-giving-ayuda-through-various-programs-aics-akap-entl [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Robredo, J., Naguit, R., & Mangalili, K. (2023). Bayanihan E-Konsulta: A volunteer-driven response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. The Humanitarian Leader. https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2023art1769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Salazar, J. N., & Villanueva, P. A. (2015). Patronage politics and clientelism in housing welfare: The case of Gawad Kalinga (GK) villages in Paranaque City, the Philippines. Journal of Government and Politics, 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2015.0013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Suazo, J. (2021, April 19). What the community pantry movement means for Filipinos. CNN Philippines. https://cnnphilippines.com/life/culture/2021/4/19/community-pantry-filipinos-pandemic.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Talabong, R., & Gavilan, J. (2020). ‘Biglang-bigla’: Duterte orders more cash aid for poor as complaints pour in. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/257131-duterte-orders-more-cash-aid-poor-complaints-pour-in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Toral, G. (2019). The benefits of patronage: How the political appointment of bureaucrats can enhance their accountability and effectiveness. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3462459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Toral, G. (2024, April 2). How patronage delivers: Political appointments, bureaucratic accountability, and service delivery in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Tribune Admin. (2020). Where art thou ayuda? Daily Tribune. https://tribune.net.ph/index.php/2020/05/04/where-art-thou-ayuda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Human development report 2005. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Viloria, A. L. C. (2022). On Economy, Efficiency, and Experience: A Policy Analysis Paper of the Social Amelioration Program. Preprint. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27230.72003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Wilkin, S. (2011). Can bad governance be good for development? Survival, 53(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2011.555601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Wong, J., Sim, A., Dos Santos, N., Waud, A., Garcia, N., & Ray, S. (n.d.). Reaching the hard to reach: A case study of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Xu, G. (2018). The costs of patronage: Evidence from the British Empire. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3170–3198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions