Communicative School Climate and Digital Pedagogical Competence in Driving Teacher Performance: Evidence from Malaysia’s TS25 Reform

Improving teacher performance remains a central priority within Malaysia’s TS25 reform, which seeks to enhance instructional quality and school effectiveness nationwide. Although leadership and innovation have been widely examined, limited empirical evidence explains how communicative school climates and teachers’ digital pedagogical competence jointly shape professional performance. This study addresses this gap by examining the direct and complementary effects of school climate communication and digital competence on teacher performance in TS25 secondary schools in Sabah. A quantitative survey was conducted with 350 teachers selected through stratified random sampling, and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that school climate communication is the strongest predictor of teacher performance, highlighting the importance of transparent dialogue, collaborative culture, and supportive leadership in strengthening instructional effectiveness. Digital pedagogical competence also demonstrates a significant positive effect, particularly in enhancing teachers’ capacity to implement innovative and adaptive instructional practices. Furthermore, a supportive communicative climate amplifies the contribution of digital competence, indicating a complementary interaction between organizational and individual resources. Theoretically, the study advances organizational communication and teacher effectiveness literature by situating digital competence within the Job Demands–Resources framework, emphasizing the synergy between contextual and personal resources in shaping performance outcomes. Practically, the findings underscore the need for policymakers and school leaders to cultivate supportive communicative environments while sustaining continuous digital professional development, especially in reform-driven and resource-diverse contexts such as Sabah where teacher performance is critical to long-term educational transformation.

Teacher Performance, School Climate Communication, Digital Pedagogical Competence, TS25 Schools, Sabah

1. Abdul Raji, R., & Ambotang, A. S. (2024). Teacher performance disparities in Malaysian secondary schools: Implications for reform. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 40(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, E. M. E., Masdar, M. H., & Engku Abdullah, E. M. (2023). Digital competency among educators in Malaysia facing the fourth industrial revolution (IR4.0): A systematic literature review. Jurnal Al-Sirat, 2(23), 66–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, M., Noor, H. M., & Sani, Z. (2021). Digital divide in Malaysian education: Challenges for rural schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 1238–1250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ali, H., Rahman, F., & Idris, N. (2020). Organizational climate and teacher performance: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 605–622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2023). Digital competence and teacher resilience in disrupted [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2023). Communication patterns in schools as drivers of reform sustainability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, 104060. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands–resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. Handbook of Well-Being. DEF Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chong, K. M. (2022). Teaching competency in the digital era in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines: Challenges of digital competency among lecturers. EBP Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Collie, R. J. (2022). Teacher well-being, engagement, and performance: The role of school climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2022). Sustaining teachers’ commitment and effectiveness in times of change. Teachers and Teaching, 28(5), 473–488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Delgado-Galindo, P., García-Jiménez, J., Torres-Gordillo, J.-J., & Rodríguez-Santero, J. (2025). School climate and academic performance: Key factors for sustainable education in high-efficacy versus low-efficacy schools. Sustainability, 17(14), Article 6497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. El-Hamamsy, L., Monnier, E.-C., Avry, S., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Liégeois, G., Bruno, B., & Zufferey, J. D. (2023). An adapted cascade model to scale primary school digital education curricular reforms and teacher professional development programs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2020). Teachers’ ICT self-efficacy and perceived ICT competence: Relations with digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2159–2179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hadiyanto, & Subhi, N. (2021). Open communication and teacher innovation in Indonesian schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 567–584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, and ICT resources on academic performance and student engagement. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hashim, U. Z. M., Puad, M. H. M., Ayub, A. F. M., & Ghazali, N. (2024). Development and assessment of a digital pedagogy competency instrument for teaching and learning: A needs analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hizam, S. M., Akter, H., Sentosa, I., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis. [arXiv preprint]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hizam, S. M., Akter, H., Sentosa, I., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change, elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 43–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ismail, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Professional learning communities and communication in Malaysian TS25 schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khalid, A., Rahman, R., & Noor, M. (2024). Transparent communication and teacher engagement: Evidence from Malaysian schools. Journal of Educational Research, 117(1), 44–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pham, T.-T.-H., Pham, H.-H., & Luong, D.-H. (2025). State-of-the-art in teachers’ online pedagogical competencies in higher education from 2011 to 2022: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Qu, G. (2024). Perceived school climate, collective teacher efficacy, self-compassion, and subjective well-being: SEM analysis among Chinese university teachers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1600. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher burnout and job satisfaction: The role of school climate. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements. Education and Information Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo, K. (2021). Examining pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as evolving knowledge domains: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1560–1575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Victor, A. O. (2025). Assessing digital competence and its impact on academic performance: A study at Universiti Malaysia Sarawak undergraduates. EduLearn, 23002, 20852100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yong, F. L., Chin, C. H., Chuah, F. S. Y., Uie, L. L. L., & Chin, Y. F. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of the cruciality of digital leadership among principals in Sabah, Malaysia: A quantitative study. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(5), e003389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yunus, M. M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence in Malaysian schools: Practices and challenges. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 715–734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhang, L. J. (2023). Predicting foreign language teaching enjoyment from self-efficacy, school climate, and well-being: SEM analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study