Community-Centric Approaches to Counter-Terrorism: A Policy Brief on Enhancing PCVE through Collaboration

This study conducts a comparative analysis of two community-centric social reintegration programs in the Philippines: the AGILA Haven Program in Maguindanao and Ronda Probinsya sa Kalinaw in Sarangani. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of these localized initiatives in preventing and countering violent extremism (PCVE) and facilitating the successful transition of former violent extremists (FVEs) back into mainstream society. Methodologically, the research employs a qualitative case study design, integrating primary data collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions involving program participants, community leaders, and key government stakeholders. This approach provides a nuanced understanding of the operational mechanisms and socio-cultural adaptations of each program. The results reveal that both initiatives successfully utilize active community engagement and sustainable livelihood projects to reintegrate FVEs and mitigate the spread of radical ideologies. However, their strategic implementations differ significantly. AGILA Haven adopts a highly integrated approach that incorporates specialized religious education and localized conflict resolution mechanisms to navigate Maguindanao’s complex socio-cultural and security dynamics. Conversely, Ronda Probinsya sa Kalinaw leverages the relatively stable environment of Sarangani by focusing heavily on consistent educational interventions and long-term community presence. Despite these achievements, both programs encounter substantial challenges, most notably the relentless recruitment efforts by active extremist factions and the vulnerability associated with fluctuating financial support from governmental and non-governmental entities. The study concludes that while community-centric approaches are indispensable for the sustainable social reintegration of former extremists, their long-term viability is heavily dependent on institutionalized support. To enhance program efficacy, policymakers must prioritize robust inter-agency collaboration, secure consistent funding streams, and maintain continuous community engagement, as these measures are critical for building resilient communities and advancing broader national security objectives.

Countering Violent Extremism, Social Reintegration, Community Engagement

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agaton, S. I. G. (2022). The Kantian Categorical Imperative and Marawi Refugees: Affirming the Importance of the Anti-Terrorism Law. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 35(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V35122022.231-241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, K. B. (2015). Educational practice: Lessons to be learned from madrasah and religious schools in contemporary Southeast Asia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v5i1.29-48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arango-Fernández, M. P., & Zuilkowski, S. (2022). The Role of Technical and Vocational Education in Social Reintegration: Insights from Colombian Ex-Combatants. Journal on Education in Emergencies, null, null. https://doi.org/10.33682/tehb-tshy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Butler, M. (2020). Using Specialised Prison Units to Manage Violent Extremists: Lessons from Northern Ireland. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(3), 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2017.1388791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. da Silva Rebelo, M. J., Fernández, M., & Meneses-Falcón, C. (2022). Chewing Revenge or Becoming Socially Desirable? Anger Rumination in Refugees and Immigrants Experiencing Racial Hostility: Latin-Americans in Spain. Behavioral Sciences, 12(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12060180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ellefsen, R., & Sandberg, S. (2022). Everyday Prevention of Radicalization: The Impacts of Family, Peer, and Police Intervention. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 0(0), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2037185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellis, B. H., & Abdi, S. (2017). Building community resilience to violent extremism through genuine partnerships. American Psychologist, 72(3), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freear, M., & Glazzard, A. (2020). Preventive Communication: Emerging Lessons from Participative Approaches to Countering Violent Extremism in Kenya. The RUSI Journal, 165(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2020.1734316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Henkin, S. (2021). Dynamic Dimensions of Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Sabah, Malaysia. https://www.resolvenet.org/research/dynamic-dimensions-radicalization-and-violent-extremism-sabah-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hikam, M. A. S., & Munabari, F. (2022). Unholy War: Violent Extremism in Marawi and Its Impacts on Muslim Communities in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 91-109. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i4.10517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists?: Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ibrahim, N. A. (2018). Countering Violent Extremism in Canada and Abroad. Inquiry@Queen's Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp.11804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mazerolle, L., Eggins, E., Cherney, A., Hine, L., Higginson, A., & Belton, E. (2020). Police programmes that seek to increase community connectedness for reducing violent extremism behaviour, attitudes and beliefs. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2020). The moral compass and life skills in navigating radicalization processes: Examining the interplay among life skills, moral disengagement, and extremism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12636 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Permanent Mission of the Republic of the Philippines to the United Nations. (2020). Measures Undertaken by the Philippine Government to Eliminate International Terrorism. https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/75/int_terrorism/philippines_e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tanoli, I., Pais, S., Cordeiro, J. M. M., & Jamil, M. (2022). Detection of Radicalisation and Extremism Online: A Survey. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1185415/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vuong, Q.-H., Le, T.-T., & Nguyen, M.-H. (2021). The psycho-religious mechanism behind suicide attacks: A mindsponge-based Bayesian statistical investigation and implications for the post-9/11 world. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/5npaz [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Centralised Versus State Policing in Nigeria: A Strategic Assessment of Implications for National Security and Security Governance