Community-Governed Digital Preservation of Zambezi Indigenous Knowledge: Transitioning Oral Traditions to Sustainable Learning Documentation in Namibia

Authors

Earnest Joy Maziezi

Africa Research University, Lusaka Zambia (Zambia)

Alex Kambulu

Africa Research University, Lusaka Zambia (Zambia)

Davy Mainde

Africa Research University, Lusaka Zambia (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600808

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 11593-11603

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Accepted: 2026-06-16

Published: 2026-07-06

Abstract

This study investigates the epistemological, ethical, and technological constraints of transitioning the oral traditions of the Mafwe, Masubia, Mayeyi, and Mashi communities in Namibia's Zambezi region into sustainable digital learning documentation without compromising cultural integrity, localized data sovereignty, or traditional protocols. Positioned at the intersection of decolonial education and heritage preservation, the research employs a qualitative participatory case study design engaging 28 purposively sampled key stakeholders, including Traditional Authority elders, youth cultural stewards, formal educators, institutional ICT officers, and senior traditional leaders. Data collection was executed through semi-structured interviews and document analysis, analyzed through the analytical lens of reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicate that while oral narratives, proverbs, and rituals function as living epistemic archives, they are vulnerable to rapid intergenerational erosion caused by urban migration, Westernized pedagogical dominance, and severe local infrastructural deficits. To resolve the tension between digital accessibility and cultural expropriation, this paper proposes a formalized Community-Governed Integrated Digital Indigenous Knowledge Documentation Model. This framework operationalizes Indigenous Data Sovereignty through Traditional Authority governance structures that regulate ownership, access permissions, stewardship responsibilities, and intellectual property rights relating to digitized knowledge. It further applies the principle of technauriture by preserving oral narratives, rituals, songs, and storytelling traditions through multimedia documentation that retains their performative and cultural context. While the model offers a theoretically grounded and community-driven framework for digital preservation, future pilot implementation is required to evaluate its practical feasibility, scalability, and long-term sustainability. This research conclude that sustainable digital preservation is achievable only when structural data governance is operationalized under the control of traditional structures rather than external institutional repositories.

Keywords

Zambezi Indigenous Knowledge; Digital Learning Documentation; Technauriture; Indigenous Data Sovereignty; Traditional Authorities; Decolonial Pedagogy.

Downloads

References

1. Adebiyi, D. T., Fashina, A., & Olusakin, A. M. (2025). Integrating indigenous knowledge into digital learning for enhanced student well-being: A counselling perspective in higher education. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.58709/niujss.v11i2.2238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amunkete, K. N. (2020). A model for the digital preservation of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants in Namibia via an e-learning platform (Master’s dissertation, University of South Africa). University of South Africa Institutional Repository. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/26842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chisita, C. T., & Ngoepe, M. (2023). Archiving and documenting indigenous knowledge: A decolonial perspective. South African Journal of Information Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dube, B. (2020). Rural online learning in the context of COVID-19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Global Indigenous Data Alliance. (2021). CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2021). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. ANU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lilemba, J. M., & Matemba, Y. (2014). Reclaiming indigenous knowledge of Mafwe in a post-colonial Namibian curriculum. Journal of Human Ecology, 48(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2014.11906780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Masenya, T. M. (2024). Revitalization and digital preservation of Indigenous knowledge systems for sustainable development of Indigenous communities in South Africa. The Serials Librarian, 84(5–8), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2023.2277962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mbinge, U., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., & Stanley, C. (2025). Co-creating digital representations of indigenous knowledge: An ovaHimba curated digital repository. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 26, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-025-00418-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mhlongo, M. (2021). A framework for the integration of indigenous knowledge into libraries in South Africa. IFLA Journal, 47(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211018224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Morford, A. C., & Ansloos, J. (2021). Indigenous sovereignty in digital territory: A qualitative study on land-based relations with Native Twitter. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211019097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nakale, A. L. N. (2023). Digital preservation maturity at the Office of the Prime Minister of Namibia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Namibia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nakashima, D., McLean, K. G., Thulstrup, H. D., Ramos Castillo, A., & Rubis, J. (2022). Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems and sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Namibia National Planning Commission. (2025). Sixth National Development Plan (NDP6): Policy document. Government of Namibia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Republic of Namibia. (2000). Traditional Authorities Act, 2000 (Act No. 25 of 2000). Government of the Republic of Namibia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Uutoni, W. E. (2024). Digital preservation preparedness of the National Library of Namibia for digital preservation of documentary heritage: A case study. University of Cape Town. https://open.uct.ac.za/items/ca089d62-ef3f-48ce-a2ab-c005d568f808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Uutoni, W. E., Raju, J., & Kalusopa, T. (2025). Documentary heritage digital preservation framework for the National Library of Namibia and the Namibia library and information sector. International Journal of Documentary Heritage, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.71278/IJODH.2025.2.1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Stanley, C., Mbinge, U., Chivuno-Kuria, S., & Zaman, T. (2025). Creating a responsible AI framework for cultural validity: Exploring heritage futures with an Ovahimba indigenous community of Namibia. In Proceedings of the 5th African Human Computer Interaction Conference (AfriCHI 2025) (pp. 358–368). https://doi.org/10.1145/3708557.3716310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles