Community Participation of Beneficiaries, Institutional Support, And Implementation of Integrated Social Forestry Program of a Public Office

Authors

Scarlette Mae L. Llanes

Faculty of the Graduate School La Carlota City College Negros Occidental the Degree Master of Public Administration (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701039

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 15195-15233

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-08

Accepted: 2026-08-13

Published: 2026-08-20

Abstract

This study determined the levels of community participation of beneficiaries, institutional support, and implementation of the Integrated Social Forestry Program (ISFP) of a public office, as well as the relationships among these variables. Specifically, it assessed community participation of beneficiaries in terms of planning, decision-making, program implementation, and monitoring and evaluation; institutional support in terms of technical assistance, training and capacity-building, financial and material support, and monitoring and supervision; and ISFP implementation in terms of lot development, land tenure, and environmental protection. The study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design and utilized a researcher-made questionnaire that underwent expert validation and reliability testing. The respondents were qualified ISFP beneficiaries from three selected People’s Organizations in the Negros Island Region. Findings revealed very high levels of community participation of beneficiaries, institutional support, and ISFP implementation. The results further showed that community participation of beneficiaries had no significant relationship with ISFP implementation, while institutional support had a significant positive relationship with ISFP implementation. The study concluded that institutional support is significantly associated with ISFP implementation. Thus, concerned public offices and partner institutions are encouraged to sustain and strengthen technical assistance, training and capacity-building, financial and material support, and monitoring and supervision to enhance the implementation and long-term sustainability of the Integrated Social Forestry Program.

Keywords

Master in Public Administration

Downloads

References

1. Book [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Magazines, Publications, Journals, and Researches [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barrameda, P. G. (2017). Certificate of stewardship contract and watershed management: A comparative study between participants and non-participants of the Integrated Social Forestry Program. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 15(2), 115–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (1991). Department Administrative Order No. 04, s. 1991: Revised regulations governing the Integrated Social Forestry Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2024a). Annual report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2024b). Forestry sector statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2023). Local governance performance management guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Forest Management Bureau. (2024). Annual accomplishment report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Government of the Philippines. (1975). Presidential Decree No. 705: Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Government of the Philippines. (1982). Letter of Instructions No. 1260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Government of the Philippines. (1987). Executive Order No. 192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Government of the Philippines. (1991). Republic Act No. 7160: Local Government Code of 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Marquez, G., Powell, B., Olavides, R., & Dionnie, H. (2024). Integrating science-based and local ecological knowledge: A case study of mangrove restoration and rehabilitation projects in the Philippines. Disasters, 48(Suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Natarajan, L., & Hassan, S. (2024). 9DF: A nine-dimensional framework for community engagement. Town Planning Review, 95(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2024.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. National Economic and Development Authority. (2023). Philippine Development Plan 2023–2028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Philippine Statistical Yearbook. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pulhin, J. M., Borlagdan, S. B., Lasco, R. D., Cruz, R. V. O., et al. (2024). Contextualizing sustainable forest management and social justice in the Community-Based Forest Management Program in the Philippines. Trees, Forests and People. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ramirez, M. A. M., Lecciones, A. M., & Capiña, X. G. B. (2019). Social forestry in the ASEAN region: Gaps and strategic interventions. Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture. (2020). Strategic responses to emerging issues in social forestry: Experiences from selected ASEAN member states. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sugimoto, A., Pulhin, J. M., & Inoue, M. (2024). Is recentralization really dominant? The role of frontline foresters for institutional arrangement in the Philippines. Small-scale Forestry. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tutor, L. G. (2013). Implementation of Integrated Social Forestry Program (ISFP) in San Carlos City, Negros Occidental. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Bank. (2023). World Development Report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Online Resources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry. (2023). Annual report 2023. https://www.cifor-icraf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry. (2024). Transforming forest landscapes through science and partnerships. https://www.cifor-icraf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024a). Community forestry and sustainable livelihoods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024b). The state of the world's forests 2024: Forest-sector innovations towards a more sustainable future. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1211en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Government at a glance 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Making peace with nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. https://www.unep.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Annual report 2024. https://www.unep.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wiset, K., Gregorio, N., Fisher, R., Mangaoang, E. O., & Herbohn, J. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of the engagement of local people in restoring degraded forest landscapes in Leyte and Biliran Provinces, Philippines. Environmental Science & Policy, 148, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles