Comparative Performance of Junior and Senior Pharmacy Students in a Malaysian Pharmacotherapy Course
Authors
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Bertam Campus, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang; Telehealth and Remote Patient Care Research Interest Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Bertam Campus, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang (Malaysia)
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Bertam Campus, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang (Malaysia)
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Bertam Campus, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang; Collaborative Drug Discovery Research (CDDR) Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Bertam Campus, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang; Telehealth and Remote Patient Care Research Interest Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Program Studi DIII, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Ranah Minang, Padang, Sumatera Barat 25171 (Indonesia)
School of Education, College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah (Malaysia)
HOE Pharmaceuticals Sdn. Bhd., 42000 Port Klang, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400240
Subject Category: Pharmacy
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 3308-3317
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-08
Accepted: 2026-04-14
Published: 2026-05-05
Abstract
Pharmacotherapy education requires integration of pharmacological knowledge with clinical application, yet performance differences between junior and senior pharmacy students within the same course remain underexplored. This study compared assessment outcomes between Semester 2 and Semester 4 Diploma in Pharmacy students enrolled in a pharmacotherapy course and examined predictors of performance. A cross-sectional study involving 159 students (Semester 2, n = 81; Semester 4, n = 78) was conducted. Assessments comprised a midterm test (20%), group assignment (20%), and final examination (60%). Semester 4 students achieved significantly higher scores in the midterm (p < 0.001), final examination (p = 0.011), and overall weighted marks (p = 0.004), while Semester 2 students scored higher in group assignments (p = 0.014). Failure rates were higher among Semester 2 students (11.1% vs. 1.3%). Regression analysis identified midterm performance as a strong predictor of final examination scores (β = 0.727, p < 0.001). Overall, senior students outperformed junior students, underscoring the diagnostic value of early assessments and the need for targeted academic support for junior cohorts.
Keywords
Academic Performance, Pharmacotherapy
Downloads
References
1. Abubakar, U., Azli, N. A. S. M., Hashim, I. A., Kamarudin, N. F. A., Latiff, N. A. I. A., Badaruddin, A. R. M., Razak, M. Z. & Zaidan, N. A. (2021), Association between grit and academic achievement among pharmacy undergraduate students in Malaysia. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abubakar, U., Salehudin, A. H. M., Asri, N. A. A. N. M., Rohi, N. A. M., Ramli, N. H., Khairuddin, N. I. M., Izham, N. F. S., Nasrullah, S. H. & Sa’ad, A. A. (2022). Perceptions of undergraduate pharmacy students towards online assessments used during the COVID-19 pandemic in a public university in Malaysia. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.191198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Campbell, A., Hinton, T., da Costa, N. C., O’Brian, S. E., Liang, D. R. & Wheate, N. J. (2024). Causes and outcomes of at-risk underperforming pharmacy students: implications for policy and practice. BMC Medical Education, 24, 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05327-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Etukakpan, A., Uzman, N., Ozer, O., Tofade, T., Leite, S. N., Joda, A., Choonara, Y., Mwila, C., Azzopardi, L. M., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Rahal, M., Darwish, R., Lee, B. J., Shakya, R., Gallagher, P. J., Moreau, P., Lourenço, L., McKinnon, R. A. & Altiere, R. J. (2023). Transforming pharmaceutical education: A needs-based global analysis for policy development. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 9, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Halimi, S. N., Mirzaei, A., Rowett, D. & Luetsch, K. (2024). An investigation of academic resilience, resilience, and empathy in pharmacy students: Implications for pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education, 24(1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.241.226237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jegede, A. O., Olabanji, K. T. & Arolagbade, T. (2024). Exploring student perceptions: Factors influencing academic performance in a school of pharmacy in Nigeria. Pharmacy Education, 24(1), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.241.238247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Khurshid, F., O’Connor, E., Thompson, R., & Hegazi, I. (2023). Pedagogical interventions and their influences on university-level students learning pharmacology-a realist review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1190672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lyons, K. M., Newman, M. C., Carlson, E. E. & Schneider, J. J. (2020). Predictors of pharmacy student performance on written examinations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(12), 777–784. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Maerten-Rivera, J. L., Medina, M. S., Joseph, J., Barnett, C. & Ballentine, J. E. (2022). Multi-institutional analysis of student and program factors as predictors of examination performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Marcinak, R., Paris, M. & Kinney, S. R. M. (2018). Pharmacogenomics education improves pharmacy student perceptions of their abilities and roles in its use. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(9), 6424. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Masnan, F., Rani, M. J. A., Alias, N. S., Esquivias, M. A., Shaari, M. S. & Kustiningsih, N. (2025). The role of sense of purpose, time management, attendance, sleep and self-esteem in academic performance among university students in Malaysia. Social Science & Humanities Open, 11, 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mosleh, R., Ghanim, M., Khatib, A. O. A., Jarrar, Y., Hamdan, A., Balasmeh, R. & Shilbayeh, S. A. R. (2025). Assessment of knowledge and perceptions of pharmacy students toward pharmacovigilance activities, and their predictors: A cross-sectional study in Palestine. BMC Medical Education, 25, 1067. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07575-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Nezhad, M. T., Shayanfar, A., Yaqoubi, S., Hamedeyazdan, S., Kazemi, M., Garjani, A. & Dizaji N. M. (2024). Implementation of an integrated pharmacy education system for pharmacy students: a controlled educational trial. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06277-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Othman, M. I., Sulaiman, S. & Ismail, W. N. H. W. (2022). Forced online and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perceptions and experiences. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(4), 894-905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Othman, M. I., Najib, M. N. M. & Sulaiman, S. (2024). Through the pharmacy lens: Unveiling students’ insights into the curriculum. Asian People Journal, 7(2), 86–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Othman M. I., Najib, M. N. M. & Sulaiman, S. (2023). Forced transition into online assessments: Exploring perceptions and challenges amongst pharmacy students. International Journal of Modern Education, 5(17), 228-243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Paraidathathu, T., Ploylearmsang, C. & Olson, P. S. (2022). The development and trends in pharmacy education across ASEAN countries. Isan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Stratton, T. P., Janetski, B. K., Ray, M. E., Higginbotham, M. C., Lebovitz, L. & Martin, B. A. (2022). Detection of academic early warning signs and effective intervention “takes a village”’. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(7), 8743. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Thanh-Thao, P. T., Song Ha, N. T., Thu Trang, T. T. & Vu Ha, D. (2024). Factors influencing pharmacy students’ satisfaction with pharmacy education quality: A cross-sectional study at a private university in Vietnam. Pharmacy Education, 24(1), 818–828. doi: 10.46542/pe.2024.241.818828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Thiagarajan, H., Jamshed, S., Suhaimi, A. M., Lua, P. L., & Ibrahim, U. I. (2023). A quantitative exploration of the knowledge of pharmacy and medical students about Pharmacogenetics: Findings from a public university in Malaysia. Pharmacy Education, 23(1), 723-731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Veerasamy, A. K., Laakso, M-J. & D’Souza, D. (2022). Formative assessment tasks as indicators of student engagement for predicting at-risk students in programming courses. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Werners, A. & Fajt, V. R. (2021). What a veterinary graduate should know about basic and clinical pharmacology: A Delphi study to finalize day-1 competencies. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 44(4), 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/JVP.12920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Yağcı, M. (2022). Educational data mining: prediction of students’ academic performance using machine learning algorithms. Smart Learning Environments, 9(11), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Zainal, Z. A., Awang N. A. I. A., Redzuan, A. M., Huri, H. Z., Hashim, R. & Jamil, N. (2023). Health sciences students’ readiness for interprofessional education (IPE) in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy, 12, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- QbD Approach to Hplc Method Development and Validation of the Simultaneous Estimation of Sulbactum and Durlobactum in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
- A Review on an Evaluation of a Liposomal Hydrogel for Combined Minoxidil and Tretinoin Delivery in Androgenetic Alopecia
- Qualitative Screening and Analysis of Lunasia amara Blanco (Tawal-ulad) Ethanolic Leaves Extract as Potential Anti-Angiogenic Inhibitors Using the Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay on Mallard Duck Embryo
- A Comprehensive Review on Calotropis Procera on Its Analgesic Activity
- Formulation, Characterization and In-Vitro Evaluation of Curcumin Loaded Liposome for Colon Drug delivery