Comparative Predictive Performance of Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machine Models in Loan Default Classification among Microfinance Institution Clients in Makueni County, Kenya

Microfinance institutions (MFIs) play a critical role in improving financial inclusion in Kenya; however, high loan default rates continue to threaten their financial sustainability. This study aimed to develop and compare the performance of Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models in predicting loan default among clients of MFIs in Makueni County, Kenya. The study adopted a quantitative research design and used secondary data comprising 4,592 borrower records obtained from selected MFIs operating within the county. Data analysis was done using python programming. Borrower socio-economic and financial attributes were extracted from loan records and preprocessed through data cleaning, normalization an. encoding procedures. To ensure robust and unbiased evaluation, Stratified 5-fold cross-validation combined with Grid Search CV hyperparameter tuning was applied across all models. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The results showed that the SVM model achieved the highest predictive performance (accuracy = 0.857, AUC = 0.914), followed by Logistic Regression (accuracy = 0.830, AUC = 0.904), while Naïve Bayes performed least effectively (accuracy = 0.740, AUC = 0.769). The findings demonstrate that SVM provides superior classification ability in capturing complex borrower patterns, while Logistic Regression remains a strong and interpretable baseline model. The study concludes that machine-learning models, particularly SVM, significantly improve credit risk prediction in microfinance environments and can support data-driven lending decisions in rural financial institutions.

Loan default, Microfinance institutions, Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes

1. R. Kandula et al., “Comparative Analysis for Loan Approval Prediction System Using Machine Learning Algorithms,” in Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies (IC3T 2023), B. R. Devi, K. Kumar, M. Raju, K. S. Raju, and M. Sellathurai, Eds. Springer, 2024, vol. 897. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-9704-6_18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Association of Micro-finance Institutions–Kenya, Microfinance Sector Report 2025. AMFI-K, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.amfikenya.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Central Bank of Kenya, Bank Supervision Annual Report 2024. Central Bank of Kenya, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Central Bank of Kenya, State of the Banking Industry Report 2025. Central Bank of Kenya, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. D. Twesige, A. Uwamahoro, P. Ndikubwimana, F. Gasheja, I. K. Misago, and U. Hategikimana, “Causes of Loan Defaults Within Microfinance Institutions: Learning from Micro and Small Business Owners in Rwanda: A Case of MSEs in Kigali,” Rwanda Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Business, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–49, 2021. doi: 10.4314/rjsshb.v2i1.3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. H. Njuguna, “Kenya’s Microfinance Banks: A Decade of Declining Fortunes,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kenyanwallstreet.com/kenyas-microfinance-banks-a-decade-of-declining-fortunes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. H. R. Boye and F. Mithi, “Firm Characteristics and Non-Performing Loans of Microfinance Banks in Kenya,” The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 368–381, 2023. doi: 10.61426/sjbcm.v10i4.2762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. I. N. Barasa, S. W. Wanyonyi, and M. M. Kololi, “Application of Logistic Regression in Enhancing Digital Credit Risk Management in Commercial Banks,” Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 13–26, 2025. doi: 10.9734/ajpas/2025/v27i2710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. K. Amzile and H. Mohamed, "Assessment of Support Vector Machine performance for default prediction and credit rating," Banks and Bank Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 161–175, 2022. doi: 10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. M. A. Rahman, “Financial Inclusion and Economic Development,” International Journal of Economics and Management Intellectuals (IJEMI), 2024. doi: 10.63665/ijemi-y1f1a002. [Ahead of print]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. M. K. Mwaka, “Factors Influencing Repayment Among Microfinance Loan Consumers in Makueni County: A Case of Nzaui/Kilili/Kalamba Ward, Makueni County, Kenya,” Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. M. M. Kasina, J. M. Kihoro, and A. Kibet, “Performance of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Risk Classification,” Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, vol. 13, pp. 504–519, 2025b. doi: 10.4236/jdaip.2025.134029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. Raymond, “The Impact of Machine Learning on Reducing Credit Risk in Microfinance Institutions,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394414373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Net Relative Run-Ratio Method (NRRR), a Foolproof Technique to Replace the Net Run Rate (NRR) Method in Evaluating the Authority of Match-Wins
• Statistical Role of CB-SEM Vs PLS-SEM in the Field of Social Science
• Predictive Modelling and Statistical Analysis of Housing Prices in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Collocational Patterns of Guru in American Business vs. Spiritual Discourse
• A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Dynamic Algorithms for Route Optimization in Johor’s Delivery Hubs