Competency Gap Analysis of Mechanical Engineering Education Graduates to the Job Needs of the Digital Era: Evidence from a Survey Study

Authors

Ali Hasbi Ramadani

Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Bima Anggana Widhiara Putra

Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Nur Aini Susanti

Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Dewanto

Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Yunus

Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700819

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 12190-12200

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-26

Accepted: 2026-07-31

Published: 2026-08-13

Abstract

The rapid transformation of the labor market driven by Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 has increased the demand for graduates who possess not only technical expertise but also employability skills that align with workplace expectations. Consequently, higher education institutions are required to continuously evaluate the relevance of graduate competencies to support curriculum improvement. This study aims to analyze the competency gap between graduates of the Bachelor's Program in Mechanical Engineering Education at Universitas Negeri Surabaya and the competencies required in the workplace using tracer study data. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed using secondary data from the 2025 institutional tracer study involving 53 graduates. Seven competency dimensions were evaluated: ethics, field-specific expertise, English proficiency, information technology skills, communication, teamwork, and self-development. Descriptive statistics, Gap Analysis, Importance Performance Analysis (IPA), and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test were applied to assess competency alignment and identify priority areas for curriculum enhancement. The results reveal relatively small competency gaps, ranging from −0.09 to −0.28, indicating that graduates' competencies are generally aligned with labor market requirements. IPA results show that no competency falls within the high-priority improvement quadrant, while ethics, communication, teamwork, and self-development are positioned in the "Keep Up the Good Work" quadrant. However, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test identifies significant differences in field-specific expertise (p = 0.005), communication (p = 0.002), teamwork (p = 0.012), and self-development (p = 0.022), suggesting that these competencies require further strengthening. This study demonstrates that integrating Gap Analysis, Importance Performance Analysis, and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating graduate competency alignment beyond conventional tracer study indicators. The findings offer practical implications for evidence-based curriculum development, continuous quality improvement, and strengthening the alignment between higher education outcomes and industry needs.

Keywords

Graduate Competency, Tracer Study, Gap Analysis, Importance–Performance Analysis, Employability Skills, Mechanical Engineering Education

Downloads

References

1. Abhari, K. (2025). Employee Participation in Digital Transformation: From Digitalization Sentiment to Transformation Predisposition. Information & Management, 62(8), 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2025.104212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, W., & Hahm, S. W. (2019). The Relationship Between Job Uncertainty and Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Charismatic Leadership, Organizational Communication, and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 338. https://doi.org/10.5430/IJFR.V10N5P338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Huangfu, D., & Chang, Y. F. (2026). Job competence gap of quantity surveying graduates of higher vocational colleges with a high dimensional measurement error model. PLOS One, 21(2), e0328617. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0328617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Junior, A. B., Martinez, B. A., Tano, I., Estacio, R., Arago, R., Bautista, G., & Bien, L. (2023). Acquired Skills of Graduates of a Local Philippine University and its Relevance to Their Present Job: A Tracer Survey. Diversitas Journal, 8(3), 2656–2669. https://doi.org/10.48017/DJ.V8I3.2644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Löfgren, S., Ilomäki, L., & Toom, A. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions on relevant upper-secondary vocational graduate competencies and their development. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(2), 98-125–198–125. https://doi.org/10.3384/NJVET.2242-458X.2212298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2020). The Demands of Industry 4.0 on Project Teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 941–949. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2899350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. OECD. (2025). OECD Skills Outlook 2025: Building the Skills of the 21st Century for All. OECD Skills Outlook, OECD Skills Outlook, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1787/26163CD3-EN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sivunen, A., & Laitinen, K. (2019). Digital communication environments in the workplace. Workplace Communication, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196881-4/DIGITAL-COMMUNICATION-ENVIRONMENTS-WORKPLACE-ANU-SIVUNEN-KAISA-LAITINEN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Spöttl, G., & Windelband, L. (2021). The 4th industrial revolution – its impact on vocational skills. Journal of Education and Work, 34(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1858230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Teng, W., Ma, C., Pahlevansharif, S., & Turner, J. J. (2019). Graduate readiness for the employment market of the 4th industrial revolutionThe development of soft employability skills. Education + Training, 61(5), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2018-0154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability. Education + Training, 59(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2016-0090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Borrego, M. (2026). The Global Gap Between the Skills of Technical-Vocational School Graduates and the Manufacturing Industry’s Needs: A 2020-2025 Scoping Literature Systematic Review. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 24–71. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.14.1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles