Compliance, Quality Assurance, and Innovation Practices in Hospitality Management Programs: A Multiple-Case Study of HEIs in Panay Island

The increasing demand for globally competitive hospitality education has compelled higher education institutions (HEIs) to strengthen compliance systems, quality assurance mechanisms, and innovative academic practices. This study explored the compliance practices, quality assurance systems, innovation initiatives, challenges, and sustaining strategies among Hospitality Management programs in selected HEIs in Panay Island, Philippines. Using a qualitative multiple-case study design, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observations involving administrators, quality assurance officers, faculty members, and program coordinators from selected institutions. Thematic analysis and cross-case synthesis were employed to identify emerging themes and institutional variations.
Findings revealed that compliance and quality assurance practices were institutionalized through structured governance systems, periodic curriculum review, faculty capability development, strategic industry partnerships, and digitalized documentation systems. Institutions also demonstrated innovation through technology integration, experiential learning, simulation-based instruction, and industry-responsive curriculum enhancement. Despite these advances, HEIs continue to experience challenges related to documentation workload, infrastructure upgrading, resource limitations, and faculty workload. The study further revealed that collaborative leadership, stakeholder engagement, and a culture of continuous improvement significantly contribute to sustaining compliance and achieving higher accreditation outcomes.
The study contributes to hospitality education management literature by providing a contextualized understanding of institutional practices within Philippine HEIs. The findings may serve as a framework for strengthening compliance systems, sustaining quality assurance initiatives, and promoting innovation in hospitality education.

compliance, quality assurance, innovation, hospitality management, higher education institutions, multiple-case study, Panay Island

1. Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2020). Planning research in hospitality and tourism. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baum, T. (2021). Human resource management for tourism, hospitality and leisure: An international perspective. Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Berger, R. (2020). Reflexivity and research: A brief introduction and practical guide. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(3), 333–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(14). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carlson, J. A. (2020). Avoiding traps in member checking. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1192–1203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chan, J., et al. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education quality assurance systems. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 25–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. CHED. (2017). Policies, standards and guidelines for Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management. Commission on Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2021). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ineson, E., et al. (2013). Hospitality management education and quality assurance systems. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kay, C., & Moncarz, E. (2004). Knowledge, skills, and abilities for lodging management success. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 285–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lugosi, P., & Lynch, P. (2016). Theoretical developments in hospitality management education. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 689–711. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yin, R. K. (2023). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria