Compliance to RA 11032: The Case of ILOCOS Training and Regional Medical Center

Authors

Melvin M. Mercado

Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Graduate Studies City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)

Josephine V. Gimpaya

Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Graduate Studies City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100338

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 4377-4394

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-16

Accepted: 2026-01-26

Published: 2026-02-05

Abstract

This descriptive research design assessed and analyzed the level of satisfaction and degree of observance of clients and implementers to the Government Service Delivery Act of 2018 (RA 11032) and identified problems encountered on compliance to RA 11032. The respondents were the 163 top management and frontline service personnel and 286 clients of ITRMC. The data gathered were treated descriptively using mode, frequency counts, and percentages. Generally, frontline and top management employees are female dominated, young in the service, and college graduate while clients were generally female, young adults, and patients of the hospital. Although it was found that the top management and frontline service personnel manifested a very high observance and the clients are extremely satisfied to RA 11032, common problems were identified such as long queue, lack of understanding to ARTA Law, and long process of specific procedures. A sustainability model should be considered for adoption to further improve and sustain their compliance.

Keywords

citizen’s charter, government services, frontline services

Downloads

References

1. Antiporda, J. (2018, May 23). 5 government agencies probed for corruption. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/5-govt-agencies-probed-for-corruption/400615/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brillantes, A. B., & Fernandez, M. T. (2011). Restoring trust and building integrity in government: Issues and concerns in the Philippines and areas for reform. International Public Management Review, 12(2), 55–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. De Mesa, C. (2017). Designation of alternate signatories for official documents. Department of Education. https://depedcavite.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DM244-s.-2017.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Health. (2019). 2019 Anti-Red Tape Act report card survey results. Department of Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Information and Communications Technology. (2019). Report on Philippine ranking in Doing Business 2020. DICT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of the Interior and Local Government Region I. (2012). Region I narrative report: Monitoring LGUs’ full compliance to the Anti-Red Tape Act. http://region1.dilg.gov.ph/ebooks/fin/AR2012/mobile/index.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of the Interior and Local Government Region I. (2021). 2021 Good Financial Housekeeping passers. DILG Region I. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Evangelio, J. V., & Abocejo, F. T. (2015). Political dynasty as perceived by residents of selected villages in Badian, Cebu City, Philippines. Countryside Development Research Journal, 3(1), 86–95. http://www.ssu.edu.ph/subdomains/ojs/index.php/CDRJ/article/view/49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gabriel, A. G. (2018). Bureaucratic red tape in the Philippines. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gabriel, A. G., & Ong, D. U. (2018). Linking transparency and accountability to local legislative performance in the province of Nueva Ecija in the Philippines. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(2), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i2.13195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Grossman, R. (2020). Knowledge gaps and workplace productivity. [Publisher not specified]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harper, D. (2010). Online etymology dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hays, J. (2008). Corruption in the Philippines. Facts and Details. https://factsanddetails.com/southeastasia/Philippines/sub5_6f/entry-3906.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. (2013). Good governance in the public sector. International Federation of Accountants. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Good-Governance-in-the-Public-Sector.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jurado, D. (2016, July 10). What is the principle that “ignorance of the law excuses no one”? Philippine Law Today. https://philippinelawtoday.wordpress.com/2016/07/10/what-is-the-principle-that-ignorance-of-the-law-excuses-no-one/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mendoza, R. U., Canare, T. A., & Ang, A. P. (2015). Doing business: A review of literature and its role in APEC (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2015-37). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/127051/1/pidsdps1537.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Morano, R. S., et al. (n.d.). The interdependence between ease of doing business, innovation, and competitiveness of nations. Brazilian Administration Review. https://www.scielo.br/j/bar/a/QbDcSGhnyxQJ4Z7xwSmtZKj/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Moreno, R. Y. (2023, July 25). Improving ease of doing business: ARTA and PPP. BusinessWorld. https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2023/07/25/535717/improving-ease-of-doing-business-arta-and-ppp/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pañares, J. L. A., & Abocejo, F. T. (2019). Evaluation of “Naga Akong Garbo” (NAGa) program: Status, challenges, and successes. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 4(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3269629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Palines, J. A., et al. (n.d.). A cross-sectional study of the health-seeking behaviours between PhilHealth members and non-members in Barangay Doña Imelda, Quezon City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Puno, R. (2008). Primer on the Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007. Local Government Academy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Republic Act No. 11032. (2018). An act promoting ease of doing business and efficient delivery of government services. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2018/05/28/republic-act-no-11032/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rio, E. (2019). Prescribing the implementing rules and regulations for Section 14 of R.A. 11032. Department of Information and Communications Technology. https://dict.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Draft_EODB_IRR_PBD_Finalv3.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Support role of women in the workplace – Civil Service Commission. (n.d.). https://contactcenterngbayan.gov.ph/267-support-role-of-women-in-the-workplace-csc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Thompson, A. E., Anisimowicz, Y., Miedema, B., Hogg, W., Wodchis, W. P., & Aubrey-Bassler, K. (2016). The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: A QUALICOPC study. BMC Family Practice, 17, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0438-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. World Bank Group. (2020). Doing business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/688761571934946384/pdf/Doing-Business-2020-Comparing-Business-Regulation-in-190-Economies.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles