Concept Maps in the Modern Classroom

Aim: To examine the theoretical foundations, instructional applications, assessment functions, pedagogical benefits, and practical limitations of concept maps, with particular attention to digital learning environments and collaborative knowledge construction. Design: A literature review was conducted. Methods: The review included theoretical and empirical publications issued mainly between 2000 and 2025, including journal articles, scholarly books, theses, dissertations, and conference proceedings. Relevant literature was identified between September and December 2025 through searches in ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu. Searches used combinations of terms related to concept maps and concept mapping. The selected literature was analyzed thematically according to the theoretical foundations, educational uses, assessment applications, benefits, and limitations of concept mapping. Results: The literature indicates that concept mapping can support the integration of prior and new knowledge, improve conceptual understanding and recall, and make learners’ cognitive structures visible. It can also strengthen critical thinking, creativity, self-regulation, and metacognitive awareness. Concept maps can be used before, during, and after instruction for diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. Collaborative concept mapping promotes dialogue, negotiation of meaning, and the co-construction of knowledge, while digital environments facilitate revision, multimedia enrichment, collaboration, and immediate feedback. However, the literature also identifies important limitations, including the time required for construction and analysis, the cognitive demands placed on inexperienced learners, the need for teacher training, and concerns regarding the validity, reliability, and subjectivity of scoring procedures. Conclusion: Concept maps are multidimensional tools that can support teaching, learning, reflection, collaboration, and assessment. Their educational effectiveness depends on explicit instruction, appropriate scaffolding, clear assessment criteria, and integration with complementary assessment methods. They should therefore be used as structured pedagogical tools rather than as isolated or purely decorative classroom activities.

Education, Pedagogy, Didactics

1. Aliakizoglou, E. (2009). Concept mapping: Evaluation of methods and tools and application to illustrative examples [Master's thesis, Postgraduate Programme in Geoinformatics, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens]. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research integrity and peer review, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baig, M., Tariq, S., Rehman, R., Ali, S., & Gazzaz, Z. J. (2016). Concept mapping improves academic performance in problem solving questions in biochemistry subject. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(4), 801–805. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bes Piá, A., Blasco-Tamarit, E., & Muñoz-Portero, M. J. (2011). Different applications of concept maps in Higher Education. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 4(1) DOI:10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n1.p81-102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Birbili, M. (2006). Mapping Knowledge: Concept Maps in Early Childhood Education. Early Childhood Research and Practice 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cañas, A. J., Novak, J. D., & Reiska, P. (2015). How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 6–19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cañas, A. &. Novak, D. (2006). Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cañas, A. J., Carff, R., Hill, G., Carvalho, M., Arguedas, M. & Safayeni Eskridge, T. (2005). Concept maps: Integrating knowledge and information visualization. In S.O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization: Searching for synergies (pp. 205-219). Heidelberg/NY: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cañas, Alberto J. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Carr-Lopez, S. M., Galal, S. M., Vyas, D., Patel, R. A., & Gnesa, E. H. (2014). The Utility of Concept Maps to Facilitate Higher-Level Learning in a Large Classroom Setting. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 78(9), 170. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe789170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, C. H., Chou, Y. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2016). An augmented-reality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 567–578. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40299-016-0284-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Davies, M. (2011). Mind mapping, concept mapping, argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? High Education, 62, pp. 279–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eshuis, E.H., ter Vrugte, J. & de Jong, T. (2022). Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps. Metacognition Learning 17, 691–713. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the 'mind map' study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fortouni, T., & Fragkaki, M. (2003). Concept mapping: A teaching intervention. Proceedings of the 2nd Panhellenic Conference “Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies in Education,” Syros, 9–11 May 2003, 411–424. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Georgiou, M. (2009). Application and integration issues of concept maps within the secondary-education curriculum [Master's thesis, Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki], p. 87. Retrieved from https://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/114033/files/GEORGIOU.pdf [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., & Grigoriadou, M. (2009). Using the concept map as a teaching, assessment, and learning tool in computer science courses. In M. Grigoriadou, E. Gouli, & A. Gogoulou (Eds.), Teaching approaches and tools for computer science education. New Technologies Publications. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gouli, E. (2007). Concept mapping in computer science education: Assessment as a learning tool in web-based and adaptive educational environments [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens]. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., & Grigoriadou, M. (2006). The concept map in the educational process of computer science: A pilot investigation. Topics in Education, Special Issue: Contemporary Research in Computer Science Education, 7(3), 351–377. Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikolaou, K. & Grigoriadou, M. (2005). Evaluating learner’s knowledge level onconcept mapping tasks. In P. Goodyear, D. Sampson, D. Yang, Kinshuk, T. Okamoto, R. Hartley & N.S. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2005) (pp. 424-428). Kaohsiung, Taiwan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikolaou, K., & Grigoriadou, M. (2005). Using the concept map as a teaching, assessment, and learning tool in computer science courses. In A. Tzimogiannis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference “Teaching Computer Science.” University of the Peloponnese, Corinth, 7–9 October 2005. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A. & Grigoriadou, M. (2003). A Coherent and Integrated Framework Using Concept Maps for Various Educational Assessment Functions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, pp. 215-240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hay, D. B., Kinchin, I. M., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Bridging the Gap between Expert-Novice Differences: The Model-Based Feedback Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (2), 103-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jonassen D. (2000). Revisiting Activity Theory as a Framework for DesigningStudent- Centered Learning Environments, In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds). Theoretical foundations of Learning Environments, LEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (volume II, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kasumu, R. (2022). Concept mapping as a teaching strategy: benefits and challenges in higher institution, International Journal of Trendy Research in Engineering and Technology, 6(6). Issn: 2582-0958. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367590450_ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kinchin, I., Hay, D. & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development, Educational Research, 42(1), 43-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kinchin, I.M. (2016). Visualising Powerful Knowledge to Develop the Expert Student: A Knowledge Structures Perspective on Teaching and Learning at University; Sense: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 15, 73. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307802074_Visualising_Powerful_Knowledge_to_Develop_the_Expert_Student [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Krieglstein, F., Schneider, S., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2022). How the design and complexity of concept maps influence cognitive learning processes. Educational technology research and development: ETR & D, 70(1), 99–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (2000). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Machado, C. T., & Carvalho, A. A. (2020). Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Matsagouras, I., & Kouloumbaritsi, A. (1999). A programme for teaching critical thinking: Theoretical principles and applications in written-language production. Psychology, 6(3), 299–326. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Narang K., & Lata, P. (2024). The construction of concept maps: enhancing learning and knowledge representation, ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 5(1). DOI:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1743. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383714877_THE_CONSTRUCTION_OF_CONCEPT_MAPS_ENHANCING_LEARNING_AND_KNOWLEDGE_REPRESENTATION [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nesbit, J., & Adesope, O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nicoll, G., Francisco, J. S. & Nakhleh, M. (2001). An Investigation of the Value of Using Concept Maps in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Novak, J. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6, 21-30. 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. (Technical Report IHMC CmapTools). FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Pensacola, available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Novak, J. & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Orue, AB, Alvarez, G, & Montoya, F. (2008). Using concept maps to improve scientific communications. On the proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Mathematics, ENMA 2008. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44745163_Using_Concept_Maps_to_improve_Scientific_Communications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pernaa, J., & Aksela, M. (2008). concept maps as meaningful learning tools in a web–based chemistry material. Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators. Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Riley, N. R. & Ahlberg, M. (2004). Investigating the use of ICT-based concept mapping techniques on creativity in literacy tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 244-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing concept maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 431–455. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10648-017-9403-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Schwendimann, B. (2014). Concept mapping. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education. Publisher: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Serrano, R. M., Ruiz, R. O., & Romera, E. M. (2010). Language proficiency and pre-conceptual mastery: working with concept maps in Early Childhood Education. Revista de Educación, 353, 589-613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Shavelson, R., Lang, H. & Lewin, B. (1993). On concept maps as potential ‘authentic’ assessments in science, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing, US Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Soares, M. & Valadares, J. (2006). Using concepts maps as a strategy to teach physics, in particular the topic of acoustics, in A. Cañas and J. Novak (eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, Vol. 2, 279-283, San Jose, Costa Rica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Stasinakis, P., & Protopapadaki, E. (2007). The use of concept maps in biology: Presentation of CmapTools software. 4th Panhellenic Conference of Educators on ICT: Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies in Teaching Practice, Syros. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Styla, D., & Michalopoulou, K. (2014). Rubrics or graduated rating scales in student assessment: A useful tool for students and teachers. Vima ton Koinonikon Epistimon, 16(64). https://doi.org/10.26253/heal.uth.ojs.sst.2014.398 [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Styla, D., & Orovou, E. (2023). Contemporary teaching methodology in education: Theory and practice. Athens: Konstantaras Publications. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tsiggidou, S., Michalopoulou, M., & Kostas, G. (2013). The use of concept mapping in preschool education: A theoretical approach and literature review. Ekpaideftikos Kyklos, 1(2). ISSN 2241-4576. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Vardaka, M., Vardakas, E., & Alimisis, D. (2004). Computer-based creation of concept maps and their instructional use. In N. Tzimopoulos (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference of Educators on ICT: Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies in Teaching Practice. Syros. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Vasilopoulou, M. (2001). The concept map as a learning tool: Applications in biology education and environmental education. Athens: Grigoris. [In Greek]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Wang, X-M., Wang, J., Xu, S-Y., & Xu, S-J. (2025). Concept mapping in STEM education: a meta-analysis of its impact on students’ achievement (2004–2023), International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1). DOI:10.1186/s40594-025-00554-2. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392898236_Concept_mapping_in_STEM_education_a_meta-analysis_of_its_impact_on_students'_achievement_2004-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Watson, M. K., Barrella, E., & Pelkey, J. (2016). Concept maps as teaching, learning, and assessment tools. First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, 1(August), p.p.1–3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study