Conceptualising and Implementing STEM in Albanian Catholic Primary Schools An Exploratory Study of Teachers' Drawings, Diagrams and Written Reflections

Authors

Joseph Xhuxhi

Faculty of Education, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, Spain (Spain)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800773

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 11386-11402

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-09-02

Published: 2026-09-17

Abstract

STEM education is a contested and context-dependent construct, and teachers' interpretations shape which disciplines, pedagogies, purposes and learners become visible in school practice. This qualitative, interpretive case study examines how 45 practising teachers from private Catholic primary schools across Albania conceptualised STEM and anticipated its implementation. Data were generated at the beginning of the first day of a three-day professional-formation event organised by the National Commission for Catholic Education in Albania at the Interdiocesan Seminary of Shkodër in June 2025, before participants received any training input. Participants first responded to the open prompt through drawings, diagrams, words or mixed visual-textual forms, 45 artefacts were collected. They then answered five open questions concerning current school and classroom practice, possible implementation, flexibility, and barriers or facilitators. Twenty-four written response pages were available for analysis. Teachers represented STEM principally as an integrated, learner-centred and developmental approach organised through projects, questions, practical activity, collaboration and teacher facilitation. Organic growth, journeys, positive affect, citizenship and school modernisation were prominent, while engineering design, mathematical evidence, testing, revision and assessment were less visible. The written responses added a more conditional account, implementation ranged from first awareness to established pockets of integrated practice, flexibility and gradual implementation were strongly endorsed; and adoption was seen to depend on professional learning, curriculum space, leadership, collaboration, resources and parental relationships. The central contribution is the distinction between an aspirational visual grammar of STEM and an operational discourse of cautious, conditional optimism. Professional learning should therefore recognise existing practical expertise while making disciplinary purpose, engineering design, evidence and curriculum alignment more explicit.

Keywords

Albania; Catholic education; integrated STEM; primary teachers; teacher conceptualisations; visual elicitation; reflexive thematic analysis

Downloads

References

1. Albanian Telegraphic Agency. (2025a, April 7). Manastirliu at “Manastir Congress” school: 80 new STEM labs in our schools. https://en.ata.gov.al/2025/04/07/manastirliu-at-manastir-congress-school-80-new-stem-labs-in-our-schools/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albanian Telegraphic Agency. (2025b, September 8). Education minister: Some 30 new schools and smart labs open as new school year begins. https://en.ata.gov.al/2025/09/08/education-minister-some-30-new-schools-and-smart-labs-open-as-new-school-year-begins/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barlex, D., Orchard, K., & Walkerdine, N. (2007). Cross-curricular collaboration in STEM. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(3), 5-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Council of Europe. (2018). Protocol amending the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (CETS No. 223). Council of Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Congregation for Catholic Education. (2014). Educating today and tomorrow: A renewing passion. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kacerja, S., Tasho, E., Zeqo, L., Kafazi, D., Cobani, S., & Vula, E. (2026). Introducing investigative approaches in mathematics teacher education: A case study from Albania. Education Sciences, 16(7), Article 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kadriu, E., Fondaj, R., & Cahanaj, E. (2026). Educating across cultures: Experiences of international student women in STEM. Journal of International Students, 16(3), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.32674/87rfhw80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Komisioni Kombëtar i Edukimit Katolik Shqiptar. (2021). Teacher professional-development needs questionnaire [Unpublished internal dataset]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kosova, R., Sina, Z., Kullolli, T., & Kosova, A. M. (2025). Examining STEM education in Albania: A survey proposal. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 9(4), 70-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Literat, I. (2013). “A pencil for your thoughts”: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. McComas, W. F., & Burgin, S. R. (2020). A critique of “STEM” education: Revolution-in-progress or passing fad? Science & Education, 29(4), 805-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00138-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato si’: On care for our common home. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Republic of Albania. (2024). Law No. 124/2024 on the protection of personal data [Ligji nr. 124/2024 për mbrojtjen e të dhënave personale]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444-467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701-1720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sina, Z., Kosova, R., Hajrulla, S., & Gjana, A. (2024). Analysis of high school STEM program impact on students’ university performance. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(7), 233-240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Thanasi (Biti), T., & Beqiri, O. (2024). Bridging the gap: Aligning high school and university mathematics curricula in Albania. European Integration - Realities and Perspectives: Proceedings 2024, 486-494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. The Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 91-103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 26-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: Meanings and motivations in the policy arena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2346-2366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1242818 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Xhuxhi, J. (2025). Learning from the past; thinking for the future: Reflections on STEM and its integration in education. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(7), 114-130. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i7.6069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Xhuxhi, J., & Ramírez-Verdugo, M. D. (2024). Albanian and Spanish bilingual primary school teacher exchange: Experience, impact, and challenges. In M. D. Ramírez-Verdugo (Ed.), Transnational approaches to bilingual and second language teacher education (pp. 179-196). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003348580-13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zyka, E., & Leskaj, E. (2026). Gender composition of STEM programs in Albania vs EU: A comparative analysis. EuroEconomica, 45(1), 21-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles